颠覆国家:宪法起草手册的文本技术

IF 0.8 Q3 SOCIAL ISSUES
S. Kendall
{"title":"颠覆国家:宪法起草手册的文本技术","authors":"S. Kendall","doi":"10.1353/HUM.2020.0000","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:The rise of expert knowledge in constitutional matters marks a turn toward \"constitutional technicity,\" where constitution drafting is regarded as a domain of technical expertise inhabited by neutral and politically divested actors. This article considers the constitution drafting manual or handbook as a genre in which technical expertise confronts the political. These documents consolidate a view of what constitutes \"best practice\" in the production of contemporary state identity, yet they also act into the field of state-building, naturalizing particular understandings of the state that reflect liberal legalist norms. In this sense the constitution-drafting manual is a consequential legal material that enlists values and actors in the production of contemporary stateness.","PeriodicalId":44775,"journal":{"name":"Humanity-An International Journal of Human Rights Humanitarianism and Development","volume":"11 1","pages":"101 - 117"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/HUM.2020.0000","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Inscribing the State: Constitution Drafting Manuals as Textual Technologies\",\"authors\":\"S. Kendall\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/HUM.2020.0000\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:The rise of expert knowledge in constitutional matters marks a turn toward \\\"constitutional technicity,\\\" where constitution drafting is regarded as a domain of technical expertise inhabited by neutral and politically divested actors. This article considers the constitution drafting manual or handbook as a genre in which technical expertise confronts the political. These documents consolidate a view of what constitutes \\\"best practice\\\" in the production of contemporary state identity, yet they also act into the field of state-building, naturalizing particular understandings of the state that reflect liberal legalist norms. In this sense the constitution-drafting manual is a consequential legal material that enlists values and actors in the production of contemporary stateness.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44775,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Humanity-An International Journal of Human Rights Humanitarianism and Development\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"101 - 117\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-04-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/HUM.2020.0000\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Humanity-An International Journal of Human Rights Humanitarianism and Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/HUM.2020.0000\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL ISSUES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Humanity-An International Journal of Human Rights Humanitarianism and Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/HUM.2020.0000","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIAL ISSUES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要:宪法事务专家知识的兴起标志着向“宪法技术性”的转变,宪法起草被视为中立和政治上被剥夺权利的行为者所居住的技术专业领域。本文认为,宪法起草手册或手册是一种技术专长与政治知识对峙的类型。这些文件巩固了一种观点,即在当代国家身份的产生中,什么是“最佳实践”,但它们也进入了国家建设领域,使反映自由法家规范的对国家的特殊理解自然化。从这个意义上说,宪法起草手册是一份重要的法律材料,它在当代国家的生产中招募了价值观和行为者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Inscribing the State: Constitution Drafting Manuals as Textual Technologies
Abstract:The rise of expert knowledge in constitutional matters marks a turn toward "constitutional technicity," where constitution drafting is regarded as a domain of technical expertise inhabited by neutral and politically divested actors. This article considers the constitution drafting manual or handbook as a genre in which technical expertise confronts the political. These documents consolidate a view of what constitutes "best practice" in the production of contemporary state identity, yet they also act into the field of state-building, naturalizing particular understandings of the state that reflect liberal legalist norms. In this sense the constitution-drafting manual is a consequential legal material that enlists values and actors in the production of contemporary stateness.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信