从土耳其人手中拯救奥斯曼历史

IF 0.2 4区 历史学 Q2 HISTORY
Edhem Eldem
{"title":"从土耳其人手中拯救奥斯曼历史","authors":"Edhem Eldem","doi":"10.1163/18775462-bja10029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n History in Turkey has always been the prey of political and ideological pressures emanating from the state and government. For decades, most of this political ‘monitoring’ was dominated by the Kemalist view of history, which often bypassed or marginalized the Ottoman past. However, the last three decades or so have witnessed a gradual but radical shift, and Ottoman history has made a comeback, to the point of warranting the use of the term ‘neo-Ottomanist’ to describe governmental policies under the Justice and Development Party (akp). This qualitative change has been further enhanced by a quantitative one, concerning an unprecedented echoing of the new government- and state-sponsored grand narrative by the media and popular culture, leading to a serious and threatening siege of the discipline from non-academic circles. The time has come for the discipline to reflect on this phenomenon and evaluate its dangers and damages.","PeriodicalId":41042,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Historical Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rescuing Ottoman History from the Turks\",\"authors\":\"Edhem Eldem\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/18775462-bja10029\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n History in Turkey has always been the prey of political and ideological pressures emanating from the state and government. For decades, most of this political ‘monitoring’ was dominated by the Kemalist view of history, which often bypassed or marginalized the Ottoman past. However, the last three decades or so have witnessed a gradual but radical shift, and Ottoman history has made a comeback, to the point of warranting the use of the term ‘neo-Ottomanist’ to describe governmental policies under the Justice and Development Party (akp). This qualitative change has been further enhanced by a quantitative one, concerning an unprecedented echoing of the new government- and state-sponsored grand narrative by the media and popular culture, leading to a serious and threatening siege of the discipline from non-academic circles. The time has come for the discipline to reflect on this phenomenon and evaluate its dangers and damages.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41042,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Turkish Historical Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Turkish Historical Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/18775462-bja10029\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Historical Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/18775462-bja10029","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

土耳其的历史一直是来自国家和政府的政治和意识形态压力的牺牲品。几十年来,大多数政治“监控”都是由凯末尔主义历史观主导的,这种历史观经常绕过或边缘化奥斯曼帝国的过去。然而,过去三十年左右见证了一个渐进但激进的转变,奥斯曼历史已经卷土重来,以至于有理由使用“新奥斯曼主义者”一词来描述正义与发展党(akp)领导下的政府政策。这种质变被量变进一步强化,涉及媒体和大众文化对政府和国家支持的新宏大叙事的前所未有的呼应,导致非学术界对这门学科的严重和威胁性的围攻。现在是该学科反思这一现象并评估其危险和损害的时候了。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Rescuing Ottoman History from the Turks
History in Turkey has always been the prey of political and ideological pressures emanating from the state and government. For decades, most of this political ‘monitoring’ was dominated by the Kemalist view of history, which often bypassed or marginalized the Ottoman past. However, the last three decades or so have witnessed a gradual but radical shift, and Ottoman history has made a comeback, to the point of warranting the use of the term ‘neo-Ottomanist’ to describe governmental policies under the Justice and Development Party (akp). This qualitative change has been further enhanced by a quantitative one, concerning an unprecedented echoing of the new government- and state-sponsored grand narrative by the media and popular culture, leading to a serious and threatening siege of the discipline from non-academic circles. The time has come for the discipline to reflect on this phenomenon and evaluate its dangers and damages.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
期刊介绍: The Turkish Historical Review is devoted to Turkish history in the widest sense, covering the period from the 6th century, with the rise of the Turks in Central Asia, to the 20th century. All contributions to the journal must display a substantial use of primary-source material and also be accessible to historians in general, i.e. those working outside the specific fields of Ottoman and Turkish history. Articles with a comparative scope which cross the traditional boundaries of the area studies paradigm are therefore very welcome. The editors also encourage younger scholars to submit contributions. The journal includes a reviews section, which, in addition to publications in English, French, and other western European languages, will specifically monitor new studies in Turkish and those coming out in the Balkans, Russia and the Middle East. The Turkish Historical Review has a double-blind peer review system.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信