“我不愿意接受笔记”:s·克雷格·扎勒，《拖过混凝土》(2018)和157页的剧本

IF 0.4 4区艺术学 0 FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION

Journal of Screenwriting Pub Date : 2022-04-01 DOI:10.1386/josc_00080_1

Lee Goodare

{"title":"“我不愿意接受笔记”:s·克雷格·扎勒，《拖过混凝土》(2018)和157页的剧本","authors":"Lee Goodare","doi":"10.1386/josc_00080_1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Drawn to its distinctive narrative style and length, in this article I examine writer-director S. Craig Zahler’s third feature screenplay, Dragged Across Concrete. I focus on Zahler’s authorship and creative writing, which flouts many screenwriting conventions. Zahler’s\n screenplay, totalling 157 pages, is considerably longer than the recommended length of 90‐120 pages and it is examined and contextualized here via discussion of length, style, character, scenes, genre and dialogue. This analysis contributes to the formal study of the screenplay as a\n source text and aims to counter what Steven Price has termed the ‘screenplay’s near-invisibility in critical analysis’.","PeriodicalId":41719,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Screenwriting","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"‘I wasn’t open to notes’: S. Craig Zahler, Dragged Across Concrete (2018) and the 157-page screenplay\",\"authors\":\"Lee Goodare\",\"doi\":\"10.1386/josc_00080_1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Drawn to its distinctive narrative style and length, in this article I examine writer-director S. Craig Zahler’s third feature screenplay, Dragged Across Concrete. I focus on Zahler’s authorship and creative writing, which flouts many screenwriting conventions. Zahler’s\\n screenplay, totalling 157 pages, is considerably longer than the recommended length of 90‐120 pages and it is examined and contextualized here via discussion of length, style, character, scenes, genre and dialogue. This analysis contributes to the formal study of the screenplay as a\\n source text and aims to counter what Steven Price has termed the ‘screenplay’s near-invisibility in critical analysis’.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41719,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Screenwriting\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Screenwriting\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1386/josc_00080_1\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"艺术学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Screenwriting","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1386/josc_00080_1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

摘要

由于其独特的叙事风格和长度，在这篇文章中，我考察了编剧兼导演S·克雷格·扎勒的第三部长片《拖过混凝土》。我关注的是扎勒的作者身份和创造性写作，这无视了许多编剧惯例。Zahler的剧本共157页，比建议的90-120页的长度长得多，通过对长度、风格、人物、场景、类型和对话的讨论，对其进行了审查和背景分析。这一分析有助于将剧本作为源文本进行正式研究，并旨在反驳史蒂文·普莱斯所说的“剧本在批判性分析中近乎隐形”。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

‘I wasn’t open to notes’: S. Craig Zahler, Dragged Across Concrete (2018) and the 157-page screenplay

Drawn to its distinctive narrative style and length, in this article I examine writer-director S. Craig Zahler’s third feature screenplay, Dragged Across Concrete. I focus on Zahler’s authorship and creative writing, which flouts many screenwriting conventions. Zahler’s screenplay, totalling 157 pages, is considerably longer than the recommended length of 90‐120 pages and it is examined and contextualized here via discussion of length, style, character, scenes, genre and dialogue. This analysis contributes to the formal study of the screenplay as a source text and aims to counter what Steven Price has termed the ‘screenplay’s near-invisibility in critical analysis’.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Journal of Screenwriting Multiple-

CiteScore

0.80

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Journal of Screenwriting aims to explore the nature of writing for the moving image in the broadest sense, highlighting current academic thinking around scriptwriting whilst also reflecting on this with a truly international perspective and outlook. The journal will encourage the investigation of a broad range of possible methodologies and approaches to studying the scriptwriting form, in particular: the history of the form, contextual analysis, the process of writing for the moving image, the relationship of scriptwriting to the production process and how the form can be considered in terms of culture and society. The journal also aims to encourage research in the field of screenwriting and the linking of scriptwriting practice to academic theory, and to support and promote conferences and networking events on this subject.