全尺寸卫生垃圾渗滤液处理：平板与中空纤维

Q2 Materials Science

Journal of Membrane Science and Research Pub Date : 2020-07-04 DOI:10.22079/JMSR.2020.123563.1358

M. Altınbaş, H. Ozturk, E. Iren

{"title":"全尺寸卫生垃圾渗滤液处理：平板与中空纤维","authors":"M. Altınbaş, H. Ozturk, E. Iren","doi":"10.22079/JMSR.2020.123563.1358","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this study was to find a cost-efficient leachate treatment system by comparing two MBR systems, flat sheet and hollow fiber. Data collected through continuous monitoring and laboratory analysis over the last two years has been evaluated in terms of treatment performance and economic analysis. MBR systems were found to be as effective and economical in terms of color, SS removal, and total treatment efficiency. It has been observed that the flat sheet membranes were clogged up in six weeks, while the hollow fiber membranes took 12–16 weeks to clog. Moreover, the hollow fiber module was less clogged and needed shorter washing times, resulting in lower amounts of chemical consumption. Hollow fiber membrane systems, compared to flat sheet membrane systems, have higher operational availability and lower maintenance costs. For the first time, the advantage of using submerged hollow fiber for the treatment of high-strength landfill leachate has been clearly demonstrated.","PeriodicalId":16427,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Membrane Science and Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"FULL SCALE SANITARY LANDFILL LEACHATE TREATMENT: Flat Sheet vs Hollow Fiber\",\"authors\":\"M. Altınbaş, H. Ozturk, E. Iren\",\"doi\":\"10.22079/JMSR.2020.123563.1358\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The aim of this study was to find a cost-efficient leachate treatment system by comparing two MBR systems, flat sheet and hollow fiber. Data collected through continuous monitoring and laboratory analysis over the last two years has been evaluated in terms of treatment performance and economic analysis. MBR systems were found to be as effective and economical in terms of color, SS removal, and total treatment efficiency. It has been observed that the flat sheet membranes were clogged up in six weeks, while the hollow fiber membranes took 12–16 weeks to clog. Moreover, the hollow fiber module was less clogged and needed shorter washing times, resulting in lower amounts of chemical consumption. Hollow fiber membrane systems, compared to flat sheet membrane systems, have higher operational availability and lower maintenance costs. For the first time, the advantage of using submerged hollow fiber for the treatment of high-strength landfill leachate has been clearly demonstrated.\",\"PeriodicalId\":16427,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Membrane Science and Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Membrane Science and Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22079/JMSR.2020.123563.1358\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Materials Science\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Membrane Science and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22079/JMSR.2020.123563.1358","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Materials Science","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是通过比较平板和中空纤维两种MBR系统，找到一种经济高效的渗滤液处理系统。在过去两年中，通过持续监测和实验室分析收集的数据已从处理性能和经济分析方面进行了评估。MBR系统在颜色、SS去除和总处理效率方面同样有效和经济。据观察，平板膜在6周内堵塞，而中空纤维膜需要12-16周才能堵塞。此外，中空纤维模块堵塞较少，需要更短的洗涤时间，从而降低了化学品的消耗量。与平板膜系统相比，中空纤维膜系统具有更高的操作可用性和更低的维护成本。首次清楚地展示了利用浸没式中空纤维处理高强度垃圾渗滤液的优势。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

FULL SCALE SANITARY LANDFILL LEACHATE TREATMENT: Flat Sheet vs Hollow Fiber

The aim of this study was to find a cost-efficient leachate treatment system by comparing two MBR systems, flat sheet and hollow fiber. Data collected through continuous monitoring and laboratory analysis over the last two years has been evaluated in terms of treatment performance and economic analysis. MBR systems were found to be as effective and economical in terms of color, SS removal, and total treatment efficiency. It has been observed that the flat sheet membranes were clogged up in six weeks, while the hollow fiber membranes took 12–16 weeks to clog. Moreover, the hollow fiber module was less clogged and needed shorter washing times, resulting in lower amounts of chemical consumption. Hollow fiber membrane systems, compared to flat sheet membrane systems, have higher operational availability and lower maintenance costs. For the first time, the advantage of using submerged hollow fiber for the treatment of high-strength landfill leachate has been clearly demonstrated.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Journal of Membrane Science and Research Materials Science-Materials Science (miscellaneous)

CiteScore

4.00

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

8 weeks

期刊介绍： The Journal of Membrane Science and Research (JMSR) is an Open Access journal with Free of Charge publication policy, which provides a focal point for academic and industrial chemical and polymer engineers, chemists, materials scientists, and membranologists working on both membranes and membrane processes, particularly for four major sectors, including Energy, Water, Environment and Food. The journal publishes original research and reviews on membranes (organic, inorganic, liquid and etc.) and membrane processes (MF, UF, NF, RO, ED, Dialysis, MD, PV, CDI, FO, GP, VP and etc.), membrane formation/structure/performance, fouling, module/process design, and processes/applications in various areas. Primary emphasis is on structure, function, and performance of essentially non-biological membranes.