{"title":"历史的欺骗:威廉·卡洛斯·威廉姆斯《美国谷物》的来源","authors":"Bryce Conrad","doi":"10.1353/WCW.2018.0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT:The author investigates the range of historical sources used by William Carlos Williams to support his writing of his 1925 history of America, In the American Grain and argues that Williams sought to show how such narratives were constructed by refusing or disrupting their authoritative status. Conrad contends that Williams’s wish to wage a war on historians was contradicted by the latter’s reliance on historians’ sources. In the American Grain is seen to be a modernist act of historical writing in which the author educates himself about the processes involved in the making of US historical narratives while seeking to disrupt notions of historical verisimilitude.","PeriodicalId":53869,"journal":{"name":"WILLIAM CARLOS WILLIAMS REVIEW","volume":"35 1","pages":"40 - 62"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/WCW.2018.0004","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Deceptive Ground of History: The Sources of William Carlos Williams’s In the American Grain\",\"authors\":\"Bryce Conrad\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/WCW.2018.0004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT:The author investigates the range of historical sources used by William Carlos Williams to support his writing of his 1925 history of America, In the American Grain and argues that Williams sought to show how such narratives were constructed by refusing or disrupting their authoritative status. Conrad contends that Williams’s wish to wage a war on historians was contradicted by the latter’s reliance on historians’ sources. In the American Grain is seen to be a modernist act of historical writing in which the author educates himself about the processes involved in the making of US historical narratives while seeking to disrupt notions of historical verisimilitude.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53869,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"WILLIAM CARLOS WILLIAMS REVIEW\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"40 - 62\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-05-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/WCW.2018.0004\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"WILLIAM CARLOS WILLIAMS REVIEW\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/WCW.2018.0004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"POETRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"WILLIAM CARLOS WILLIAMS REVIEW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/WCW.2018.0004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"POETRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
摘要:作者调查了威廉·卡洛斯·威廉姆斯(William Carlos Williams)为支持他1925年的美国史《美国谷物》(In The American Grain)而使用的一系列历史资料,并认为威廉姆斯试图通过拒绝或破坏其权威地位来展示这些叙事是如何构建的。康拉德认为,威廉姆斯向历史学家发动战争的愿望与后者对历史学家来源的依赖相矛盾。在《美国谷物》中,作者被视为一种现代主义的历史写作行为,在这种行为中,作者自学美国历史叙事的制作过程,同时试图打破历史真实性的概念。
The Deceptive Ground of History: The Sources of William Carlos Williams’s In the American Grain
ABSTRACT:The author investigates the range of historical sources used by William Carlos Williams to support his writing of his 1925 history of America, In the American Grain and argues that Williams sought to show how such narratives were constructed by refusing or disrupting their authoritative status. Conrad contends that Williams’s wish to wage a war on historians was contradicted by the latter’s reliance on historians’ sources. In the American Grain is seen to be a modernist act of historical writing in which the author educates himself about the processes involved in the making of US historical narratives while seeking to disrupt notions of historical verisimilitude.