康德激进邪恶的政治与恐怖主义

Q4 Social Sciences

Politologija Pub Date : 2022-03-15 DOI:10.15388/polit.2021.104.3

Gintautas Grigonis

{"title":"康德激进邪恶的政治与恐怖主义","authors":"Gintautas Grigonis","doi":"10.15388/polit.2021.104.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article analyzes Immanuel Kant’s concept of radical evil within the broader corpus of Kant’s practical works in order to ascertain whether suicidal terrorism can be interpreted using his philosophical framework. Said analysis establishes the dynamic between radical evil and other characteristics of Kantian human nature – unsocial-sociability and propensity towards humanity, whilst focusing on the political implications of said dynamic. When analyzed utilizing the established framework of politics of radical evil, suicidal terrorism reveals the extremities of human behavior as well as potential flaws of Kantian philosophy.","PeriodicalId":35151,"journal":{"name":"Politologija","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Politics and Terrorism of Immanuel Kant‘s Radical Evil\",\"authors\":\"Gintautas Grigonis\",\"doi\":\"10.15388/polit.2021.104.3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article analyzes Immanuel Kant’s concept of radical evil within the broader corpus of Kant’s practical works in order to ascertain whether suicidal terrorism can be interpreted using his philosophical framework. Said analysis establishes the dynamic between radical evil and other characteristics of Kantian human nature – unsocial-sociability and propensity towards humanity, whilst focusing on the political implications of said dynamic. When analyzed utilizing the established framework of politics of radical evil, suicidal terrorism reveals the extremities of human behavior as well as potential flaws of Kantian philosophy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35151,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Politologija\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Politologija\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15388/polit.2021.104.3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Politologija","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15388/polit.2021.104.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

本文在康德实践著作的更广泛的语料库中分析了伊曼纽尔·康德的激进邪恶概念，以确定自杀性恐怖主义是否可以用他的哲学框架来解释。所述分析建立了激进邪恶与康德人性的其他特征之间的动态——不合群的社交能力和对人性的倾向，同时关注所述动态的政治含义。当利用激进邪恶政治的既定框架进行分析时，自杀恐怖主义揭示了人类行为的极端以及康德哲学的潜在缺陷。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Politics and Terrorism of Immanuel Kant‘s Radical Evil

This article analyzes Immanuel Kant’s concept of radical evil within the broader corpus of Kant’s practical works in order to ascertain whether suicidal terrorism can be interpreted using his philosophical framework. Said analysis establishes the dynamic between radical evil and other characteristics of Kantian human nature – unsocial-sociability and propensity towards humanity, whilst focusing on the political implications of said dynamic. When analyzed utilizing the established framework of politics of radical evil, suicidal terrorism reveals the extremities of human behavior as well as potential flaws of Kantian philosophy.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Politologija Social Sciences-Political Science and International Relations

CiteScore

0.30

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

12 weeks