《人的权利:自由意志主义者对男性而非女性生育自主权的关注》

IF 4 1区 社会学 Q1 POLITICAL SCIENCE
Jocelyn Chalmers, A. Petterson, Leif Woodford, Robbie M. Sutton
{"title":"《人的权利:自由意志主义者对男性而非女性生育自主权的关注》","authors":"Jocelyn Chalmers, A. Petterson, Leif Woodford, Robbie M. Sutton","doi":"10.1111/pops.12867","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Libertarianism enshrines individual autonomy as its central political principle, but it has been criticized for applying this principle selectively. Reproductive decisions can stress the concept of individual autonomy by placing into conflict the claimed rights of each biological parent to choose. Two studies (N 1 = 296; N 2 = 580) show that among U.S. participants, libertarianism is associated with opposition to women’s reproductive autonomy and support for men’s. Libertarianism was associated with opposition to abortion rights and support for men’s right both to prevent women from having abortions (male veto) and to withdraw financial support for a child when women refuse to terminate the pregnancy (financial abortion). Adjusting for the association between libertarianism and conservatism, only the relationship with opposition to abortion rights was rendered nonsignificant. Mediation analyses suggest that hostile sexism may account for libertarians’ selective support for men’s and not women’s reproductive autonomy.","PeriodicalId":48332,"journal":{"name":"Political Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Rights of Man: Libertarian Concern for Men's, But Not Women's, Reproductive Autonomy\",\"authors\":\"Jocelyn Chalmers, A. Petterson, Leif Woodford, Robbie M. Sutton\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/pops.12867\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Libertarianism enshrines individual autonomy as its central political principle, but it has been criticized for applying this principle selectively. Reproductive decisions can stress the concept of individual autonomy by placing into conflict the claimed rights of each biological parent to choose. Two studies (N 1 = 296; N 2 = 580) show that among U.S. participants, libertarianism is associated with opposition to women’s reproductive autonomy and support for men’s. Libertarianism was associated with opposition to abortion rights and support for men’s right both to prevent women from having abortions (male veto) and to withdraw financial support for a child when women refuse to terminate the pregnancy (financial abortion). Adjusting for the association between libertarianism and conservatism, only the relationship with opposition to abortion rights was rendered nonsignificant. Mediation analyses suggest that hostile sexism may account for libertarians’ selective support for men’s and not women’s reproductive autonomy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48332,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Political Psychology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Political Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12867\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Political Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12867","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

自由意志主义将个人自治奉为其核心政治原则,但它因有选择地应用这一原则而受到批评。生殖决定可以强调个人自主的概念,使每个亲生父母所声称的选择权发生冲突。两项研究(N 1 = 296;N 2 = 580)表明,在美国参与者中,自由意志主义与反对女性生殖自主和支持男性生殖自主有关。自由意志主义与反对堕胎权利和支持男性的权利联系在一起,既可以阻止女性堕胎(男性否决权),也可以在女性拒绝终止妊娠时撤回对孩子的经济支持(经济堕胎)。调整自由意志主义和保守主义之间的联系,只有反对堕胎权的关系变得不重要。调解分析表明,敌对的性别歧视可能是自由意志主义者选择性地支持男性而不是女性生殖自主的原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Rights of Man: Libertarian Concern for Men's, But Not Women's, Reproductive Autonomy
Libertarianism enshrines individual autonomy as its central political principle, but it has been criticized for applying this principle selectively. Reproductive decisions can stress the concept of individual autonomy by placing into conflict the claimed rights of each biological parent to choose. Two studies (N 1 = 296; N 2 = 580) show that among U.S. participants, libertarianism is associated with opposition to women’s reproductive autonomy and support for men’s. Libertarianism was associated with opposition to abortion rights and support for men’s right both to prevent women from having abortions (male veto) and to withdraw financial support for a child when women refuse to terminate the pregnancy (financial abortion). Adjusting for the association between libertarianism and conservatism, only the relationship with opposition to abortion rights was rendered nonsignificant. Mediation analyses suggest that hostile sexism may account for libertarians’ selective support for men’s and not women’s reproductive autonomy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
6.50%
发文量
70
期刊介绍: Understanding the psychological aspects of national and international political developments is increasingly important in this age of international tension and sweeping political change. Political Psychology, the journal of the International Society of Political Psychology, is dedicated to the analysis of the interrelationships between psychological and political processes. International contributors draw on a diverse range of sources, including clinical and cognitive psychology, economics, history, international relations, philosophy, political science, political theory, sociology, personality and social psychology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信