可持续设计决策账户的构建:一种话语心理学分析

IF 3.2 1区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING
Liz Cooper
{"title":"可持续设计决策账户的构建:一种话语心理学分析","authors":"Liz Cooper","doi":"10.1016/j.destud.2022.101158","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Many methods have been developed to help designers make better and more sustainable design decisions. Yet there is limited research on designers' perspectives on design decision-making. In this study, discursive psychology is used to analyse designers' accounts of decision-making. The designers show difficulty in trying to describe decision-making as an identifiable action. Different strategies are used to articulate how decision-making fits into the design process. Accounts of how decisions are made involve constructions of rational decision-making which are then undermined through ‘confessions’ of intuition. Decisions about sustainability are portrayed as made by other stakeholders, rather than by designers. The findings show that decision-making is a flexible construct that can be used to account for various actions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50593,"journal":{"name":"Design Studies","volume":"84 ","pages":"Article 101158"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Constructing accounts of decision-making in sustainable design: A discursive psychology analysis\",\"authors\":\"Liz Cooper\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.destud.2022.101158\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Many methods have been developed to help designers make better and more sustainable design decisions. Yet there is limited research on designers' perspectives on design decision-making. In this study, discursive psychology is used to analyse designers' accounts of decision-making. The designers show difficulty in trying to describe decision-making as an identifiable action. Different strategies are used to articulate how decision-making fits into the design process. Accounts of how decisions are made involve constructions of rational decision-making which are then undermined through ‘confessions’ of intuition. Decisions about sustainability are portrayed as made by other stakeholders, rather than by designers. The findings show that decision-making is a flexible construct that can be used to account for various actions.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50593,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Design Studies\",\"volume\":\"84 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101158\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Design Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0142694X22000783\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Design Studies","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0142694X22000783","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

已经开发了许多方法来帮助设计师做出更好、更可持续的设计决策。然而,关于设计师对设计决策的看法的研究却很有限。在这项研究中,话语心理学被用来分析设计师的决策账户。设计师很难将决策描述为可识别的行动。不同的策略用于阐明决策如何适应设计过程。关于如何做出决策的解释涉及理性决策的构建,然后通过直觉的“忏悔”来破坏理性决策。关于可持续发展的决定是由其他利益相关者做出的,而不是由设计师做出的。研究结果表明,决策是一个灵活的结构,可以用来解释各种行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Constructing accounts of decision-making in sustainable design: A discursive psychology analysis

Many methods have been developed to help designers make better and more sustainable design decisions. Yet there is limited research on designers' perspectives on design decision-making. In this study, discursive psychology is used to analyse designers' accounts of decision-making. The designers show difficulty in trying to describe decision-making as an identifiable action. Different strategies are used to articulate how decision-making fits into the design process. Accounts of how decisions are made involve constructions of rational decision-making which are then undermined through ‘confessions’ of intuition. Decisions about sustainability are portrayed as made by other stakeholders, rather than by designers. The findings show that decision-making is a flexible construct that can be used to account for various actions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Design Studies
Design Studies 工程技术-工程:制造
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
20.00%
发文量
41
审稿时长
40 days
期刊介绍: Design Studies is a leading international academic journal focused on developing understanding of design processes. It studies design activity across all domains of application, including engineering and product design, architectural and urban design, computer artefacts and systems design. It therefore provides an interdisciplinary forum for the analysis, development and discussion of fundamental aspects of design activity, from cognition and methodology to values and philosophy. Design Studies publishes work that is concerned with the process of designing, and is relevant to a broad audience of researchers, teachers and practitioners. We welcome original, scientific and scholarly research papers reporting studies concerned with the process of designing in all its many fields, or furthering the development and application of new knowledge relating to design process. Papers should be written to be intelligible and pertinent to a wide range of readership across different design domains. To be relevant for this journal, a paper has to offer something that gives new insight into or knowledge about the design process, or assists new development of the processes of designing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信