建立早期重音的推进来确定旧媒体的程序:提案的解决方案

IF 0.1 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
Ander Egurtzegi
{"title":"建立早期重音的推进来确定旧媒体的程序:提案的解决方案","authors":"Ander Egurtzegi","doi":"10.35462/flv133.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The development of the prosodic system of Goizueta is the main point of disagreement\nthe two last hypotheses –Hualde’s and Egurtzegi & Elordieta’s– will be compared, highlighting their main strengths and shortcomings in order to evaluate each proposal’s plausibility. After the comparison, Egurtzegi and Elordieta’s hypothesis is favored, be-cause its main shortcoming (that is, the need of proposing analogical processes between\nof this proposal are absent in the former.","PeriodicalId":32721,"journal":{"name":"Fontes Linguae Vasconum","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Goizuetako azentueraren garapena kokatzen Euskara Batu Zaharraren prosodia zehazteko: proposamenen ebaluazioa\",\"authors\":\"Ander Egurtzegi\",\"doi\":\"10.35462/flv133.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The development of the prosodic system of Goizueta is the main point of disagreement\\nthe two last hypotheses –Hualde’s and Egurtzegi & Elordieta’s– will be compared, highlighting their main strengths and shortcomings in order to evaluate each proposal’s plausibility. After the comparison, Egurtzegi and Elordieta’s hypothesis is favored, be-cause its main shortcoming (that is, the need of proposing analogical processes between\\nof this proposal are absent in the former.\",\"PeriodicalId\":32721,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fontes Linguae Vasconum\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fontes Linguae Vasconum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35462/flv133.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fontes Linguae Vasconum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35462/flv133.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

Goizueta韵律系统的发展是主要的分歧点。将对最后两个假设——Hualde和Egurtzegi&Elordieta的假设——进行比较,突出它们的主要优点和缺点,以评估每个建议的合理性。经过比较,Egurtzegi和Elordieta的假设是受欢迎的,这是由于其主要缺点(即前者不需要提出该建议之间的类比过程)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Goizuetako azentueraren garapena kokatzen Euskara Batu Zaharraren prosodia zehazteko: proposamenen ebaluazioa
The development of the prosodic system of Goizueta is the main point of disagreement the two last hypotheses –Hualde’s and Egurtzegi & Elordieta’s– will be compared, highlighting their main strengths and shortcomings in order to evaluate each proposal’s plausibility. After the comparison, Egurtzegi and Elordieta’s hypothesis is favored, be-cause its main shortcoming (that is, the need of proposing analogical processes between of this proposal are absent in the former.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Fontes Linguae Vasconum
Fontes Linguae Vasconum Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信