面向开发热点的ms word 2019办公自动化应用课程练习题

Soraya Fatmawati, Oktavia Hardiyantari
{"title":"面向开发热点的ms word 2019办公自动化应用课程练习题","authors":"Soraya Fatmawati, Oktavia Hardiyantari","doi":"10.33578/pjr.v7i2.9077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper develops MS Word 2019 practice questions oriented with the HOTS (Higher Order Thinking Skills) on the Office Automation application course. This development research uses the limited ADDIE model, namely Analysis, Design, and Development. The analysis is carried out by identifying problems in the Office Automation application course. Subsequently, the developmental planning of the instrument is carried out. The HOTS-oriented practice questions contain questions in the form of descriptions using indicators of critical thinking, creative thinking, and problem-solving. The data are collected from the assessment of two validation experts using expert validation assessment sheets and responses from 24 students through questionnaires. Data analysis used quantitative descriptive analysis techniques. The research results imply that the HOTS-oriented MS Word 2019 practice questions are feasible to use as teaching materials in the Office Automation application course. It is based on the material expert's assessment was 85.6 with a very feasible category and the result of students’ responses was 83.3 with a very feasible category. The assessment aspects of expert validation include aspects of the relationship between the questions and the material, aspects of the question depth with learning outcomes, and aspects of language.","PeriodicalId":17723,"journal":{"name":"JURNAL PAJAR (Pendidikan dan Pengajaran)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"DEVELOPMENT HOTS-ORIENTED MS WORD 2019 PRACTICE QUESTIONS ON THE OFFICE AUTOMATION APPLICATION COURSE\",\"authors\":\"Soraya Fatmawati, Oktavia Hardiyantari\",\"doi\":\"10.33578/pjr.v7i2.9077\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper develops MS Word 2019 practice questions oriented with the HOTS (Higher Order Thinking Skills) on the Office Automation application course. This development research uses the limited ADDIE model, namely Analysis, Design, and Development. The analysis is carried out by identifying problems in the Office Automation application course. Subsequently, the developmental planning of the instrument is carried out. The HOTS-oriented practice questions contain questions in the form of descriptions using indicators of critical thinking, creative thinking, and problem-solving. The data are collected from the assessment of two validation experts using expert validation assessment sheets and responses from 24 students through questionnaires. Data analysis used quantitative descriptive analysis techniques. The research results imply that the HOTS-oriented MS Word 2019 practice questions are feasible to use as teaching materials in the Office Automation application course. It is based on the material expert's assessment was 85.6 with a very feasible category and the result of students’ responses was 83.3 with a very feasible category. The assessment aspects of expert validation include aspects of the relationship between the questions and the material, aspects of the question depth with learning outcomes, and aspects of language.\",\"PeriodicalId\":17723,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JURNAL PAJAR (Pendidikan dan Pengajaran)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JURNAL PAJAR (Pendidikan dan Pengajaran)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33578/pjr.v7i2.9077\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JURNAL PAJAR (Pendidikan dan Pengajaran)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33578/pjr.v7i2.9077","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文以办公自动化应用课程中的HOTS(高阶思维技能)为指导,开发了MS Word 2019练习题。本开发研究使用有限的ADDIE模型,即分析、设计和开发。通过找出办公自动化应用过程中存在的问题进行分析。随后,对仪器进行了开发规划。以hots为导向的练习题包括用批判性思维、创造性思维和解决问题的指标来描述的问题。数据收集自两位验证专家使用专家验证评估表的评估和24名学生通过问卷的回答。数据分析采用定量描述性分析技术。研究结果表明,基于hots的MS Word 2019练习题在办公自动化应用课程中作为教材是可行的。它是基于材料专家的评估是85.6与一个非常可行的类别,学生的反应结果是83.3与一个非常可行的类别。专家验证的评估方面包括问题与材料之间的关系,问题深度与学习成果的关系以及语言的方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
DEVELOPMENT HOTS-ORIENTED MS WORD 2019 PRACTICE QUESTIONS ON THE OFFICE AUTOMATION APPLICATION COURSE
This paper develops MS Word 2019 practice questions oriented with the HOTS (Higher Order Thinking Skills) on the Office Automation application course. This development research uses the limited ADDIE model, namely Analysis, Design, and Development. The analysis is carried out by identifying problems in the Office Automation application course. Subsequently, the developmental planning of the instrument is carried out. The HOTS-oriented practice questions contain questions in the form of descriptions using indicators of critical thinking, creative thinking, and problem-solving. The data are collected from the assessment of two validation experts using expert validation assessment sheets and responses from 24 students through questionnaires. Data analysis used quantitative descriptive analysis techniques. The research results imply that the HOTS-oriented MS Word 2019 practice questions are feasible to use as teaching materials in the Office Automation application course. It is based on the material expert's assessment was 85.6 with a very feasible category and the result of students’ responses was 83.3 with a very feasible category. The assessment aspects of expert validation include aspects of the relationship between the questions and the material, aspects of the question depth with learning outcomes, and aspects of language.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
130
审稿时长
17 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信