词汇是怎么回事?词汇研究的设计、策略和理论综述

IF 1.2 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL
Cherrynn Kast Black, Katherine Landau Wright
{"title":"词汇是怎么回事?词汇研究的设计、策略和理论综述","authors":"Cherrynn Kast Black, Katherine Landau Wright","doi":"10.1080/02702711.2023.2253249","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Strong academic vocabulary is necessary for students’ success in school. Recently, researchers recommended studying integrated approaches for developing vocabulary, which is predictive of students’ long-term school success. Based on the premise that teachers who understand the theoretical foundations guiding their practice are better equipped to adapt strategies to meet the needs of their students, other researchers have attempted to identify theories underlying vocabulary instruction. Because teachers require the support of researchers who combine best practices in instruction with the theoretical frameworks on which they are based, we combined approaches implemented in three systematic reviews with an exploration of a variety of characteristics of vocabulary research studies. This scoping systematic literature review provides a snapshot of research specifically exploring vocabulary development and instruction. Articles included in nine highly respected literacy journals from 2017 to 2021 revealed a sudden increase in the number of vocabulary focused research studies published, doubling and tripling in 2020 and 2021. This may signal shifting paradigms in vocabulary research as multiple components including variety in vocabulary studies, identification of educational theories underlying vocabulary instruction, and alignment of vocabulary studies with best practices revealed both persistent gaps and progress toward exploration of more comprehensive vocabulary development programs.","PeriodicalId":46567,"journal":{"name":"Reading Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What’s Up With Words? A Systematic Review of Designs, Strategies, and Theories Underlying Vocabulary Research\",\"authors\":\"Cherrynn Kast Black, Katherine Landau Wright\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02702711.2023.2253249\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Strong academic vocabulary is necessary for students’ success in school. Recently, researchers recommended studying integrated approaches for developing vocabulary, which is predictive of students’ long-term school success. Based on the premise that teachers who understand the theoretical foundations guiding their practice are better equipped to adapt strategies to meet the needs of their students, other researchers have attempted to identify theories underlying vocabulary instruction. Because teachers require the support of researchers who combine best practices in instruction with the theoretical frameworks on which they are based, we combined approaches implemented in three systematic reviews with an exploration of a variety of characteristics of vocabulary research studies. This scoping systematic literature review provides a snapshot of research specifically exploring vocabulary development and instruction. Articles included in nine highly respected literacy journals from 2017 to 2021 revealed a sudden increase in the number of vocabulary focused research studies published, doubling and tripling in 2020 and 2021. This may signal shifting paradigms in vocabulary research as multiple components including variety in vocabulary studies, identification of educational theories underlying vocabulary instruction, and alignment of vocabulary studies with best practices revealed both persistent gaps and progress toward exploration of more comprehensive vocabulary development programs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46567,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reading Psychology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reading Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2023.2253249\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reading Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2023.2253249","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
What’s Up With Words? A Systematic Review of Designs, Strategies, and Theories Underlying Vocabulary Research
Abstract Strong academic vocabulary is necessary for students’ success in school. Recently, researchers recommended studying integrated approaches for developing vocabulary, which is predictive of students’ long-term school success. Based on the premise that teachers who understand the theoretical foundations guiding their practice are better equipped to adapt strategies to meet the needs of their students, other researchers have attempted to identify theories underlying vocabulary instruction. Because teachers require the support of researchers who combine best practices in instruction with the theoretical frameworks on which they are based, we combined approaches implemented in three systematic reviews with an exploration of a variety of characteristics of vocabulary research studies. This scoping systematic literature review provides a snapshot of research specifically exploring vocabulary development and instruction. Articles included in nine highly respected literacy journals from 2017 to 2021 revealed a sudden increase in the number of vocabulary focused research studies published, doubling and tripling in 2020 and 2021. This may signal shifting paradigms in vocabulary research as multiple components including variety in vocabulary studies, identification of educational theories underlying vocabulary instruction, and alignment of vocabulary studies with best practices revealed both persistent gaps and progress toward exploration of more comprehensive vocabulary development programs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Reading Psychology
Reading Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
7.10%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: Prepared exclusively by professionals, this refereed journal publishes original manuscripts in the fields of literacy, reading, and related psychology disciplines. Articles appear in the form of completed research; practitioner-based "experiential" methods or philosophical statements; teacher and counselor preparation services for guiding all levels of reading skill development, attitudes, and interests; programs or materials; and literary or humorous contributions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信