认知价值、立场选择与情感的显性形象——对评论者的回应

IF 3 2区心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY

Emotion Review Pub Date : 2022-09-21 DOI:10.1177/17540739221127654

Jean Moritz Müller

{"title":"认知价值、立场选择与情感的显性形象——对评论者的回应","authors":"Jean Moritz Müller","doi":"10.1177/17540739221127654","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article clarifies and defends my view of emotional feeling in response to the commentaries by Ronnie de Sousa, Rick Furtak, Agnes Moors, Kevin Mulligan, Rainer Reisenzein and Philipp Schmidt. The issues addressed concern my critique of the axiological receptivity view, my proposed alternative, i.e. the position-taking view, as well as my methodological commitments.","PeriodicalId":48064,"journal":{"name":"Emotion Review","volume":"14 1","pages":"279 - 287"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Apprehending Value, Position-Taking and the Manifest Image of Emotion: Responses to Commentators\",\"authors\":\"Jean Moritz Müller\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/17540739221127654\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article clarifies and defends my view of emotional feeling in response to the commentaries by Ronnie de Sousa, Rick Furtak, Agnes Moors, Kevin Mulligan, Rainer Reisenzein and Philipp Schmidt. The issues addressed concern my critique of the axiological receptivity view, my proposed alternative, i.e. the position-taking view, as well as my methodological commitments.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48064,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Emotion Review\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"279 - 287\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Emotion Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/17540739221127654\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emotion Review","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17540739221127654","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

本文对Ronnie de Sousa、Rick Furtak、Agnes Moors、Kevin Mulligan、Rainer Reisenzein和Philipp Schmidt的评论进行了澄清和辩护，阐明了我对情感的看法。讨论的问题涉及我对价值论接受性观点的批判，我提出的替代方案，即立场观点，以及我的方法论承诺。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Apprehending Value, Position-Taking and the Manifest Image of Emotion: Responses to Commentators

This article clarifies and defends my view of emotional feeling in response to the commentaries by Ronnie de Sousa, Rick Furtak, Agnes Moors, Kevin Mulligan, Rainer Reisenzein and Philipp Schmidt. The issues addressed concern my critique of the axiological receptivity view, my proposed alternative, i.e. the position-taking view, as well as my methodological commitments.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Emotion Review PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-

CiteScore

6.60

自引率

3.70%

发文量

期刊介绍： Emotion Review is a fully peer reviewed scholarly journal. It adheres to a blinded peer review process in which the reviewer"s name is routinely withheld from the author unless the reviewer requests a preference for their identity to be revealed. All manuscripts are reviewed initially by the Editors and only those papers that meet the scientific and editorial standards of the journal, and fit within the aims and scope of the journal, will be sent for outside review. Emotion Review will focus on ideas about emotion, with "emotion" broadly defined. The Review will publish articles presenting new theories, offering conceptual analyses, reviewing the literature, and debating and critiquing conceptual issues.