物理学习中概念变化模型对学生概念理解的影响

IF 0.3 Q4 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
N. P. E. Adriana Sari, I. W. Santyasa, I. Gunadi
{"title":"物理学习中概念变化模型对学生概念理解的影响","authors":"N. P. E. Adriana Sari, I. W. Santyasa, I. Gunadi","doi":"10.15294/jpfi.v17i2.27585","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims at describing differences of students’ conceptual understanding in learning physics between students who learn with the conceptual change model (CCM) and direct learning model (DIM). This quasi-experimental research used the pretest-posttest one-way non-equivalent control group design. The study population were students of class XI. The sample was selected by random assignment technique. Data of students’ conceptual understanding was collected with a physics conceptual test. The test in the form of multiple choice with written justification consists of 20 items. Data were analyzed descriptively and ANACOVA. As a follow-up to ANACOVA, the Least Significant Difference (LSD) was used to test the comparison of the mean scores of the treatment groups. The results showed that there were differences in conceptual understanding between students’ studying with CCM and DIM. Need to make conceptual changes will occur optimally if physics learning uses CCM.","PeriodicalId":42020,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia-Indonesian Journal of Physics Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effect of Conceptual Change Models on Students' Conceptual Understanding in Learning Physics\",\"authors\":\"N. P. E. Adriana Sari, I. W. Santyasa, I. Gunadi\",\"doi\":\"10.15294/jpfi.v17i2.27585\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study aims at describing differences of students’ conceptual understanding in learning physics between students who learn with the conceptual change model (CCM) and direct learning model (DIM). This quasi-experimental research used the pretest-posttest one-way non-equivalent control group design. The study population were students of class XI. The sample was selected by random assignment technique. Data of students’ conceptual understanding was collected with a physics conceptual test. The test in the form of multiple choice with written justification consists of 20 items. Data were analyzed descriptively and ANACOVA. As a follow-up to ANACOVA, the Least Significant Difference (LSD) was used to test the comparison of the mean scores of the treatment groups. The results showed that there were differences in conceptual understanding between students’ studying with CCM and DIM. Need to make conceptual changes will occur optimally if physics learning uses CCM.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42020,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia-Indonesian Journal of Physics Education\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia-Indonesian Journal of Physics Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15294/jpfi.v17i2.27585\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia-Indonesian Journal of Physics Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15294/jpfi.v17i2.27585","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本研究旨在描述使用概念变化模型(CCM)和直接学习模型(DIM)学习的学生在物理学习中概念理解的差异。本准实验研究采用前测后测单向非等效对照组设计。研究对象为XI班学生。样品采用随机分配技术进行选择。通过物理概念测试收集学生概念理解的数据。该测试采用多选形式,并附有书面理由,共有20个项目。对数据进行描述性分析和ANACOVA。作为ANACOVA的随访,使用最小显著性差异(LSD)来测试治疗组平均得分的比较。结果表明,CCM和DIM学生在概念理解上存在差异。如果物理学习使用CCM,则需要进行概念上的改变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Effect of Conceptual Change Models on Students' Conceptual Understanding in Learning Physics
This study aims at describing differences of students’ conceptual understanding in learning physics between students who learn with the conceptual change model (CCM) and direct learning model (DIM). This quasi-experimental research used the pretest-posttest one-way non-equivalent control group design. The study population were students of class XI. The sample was selected by random assignment technique. Data of students’ conceptual understanding was collected with a physics conceptual test. The test in the form of multiple choice with written justification consists of 20 items. Data were analyzed descriptively and ANACOVA. As a follow-up to ANACOVA, the Least Significant Difference (LSD) was used to test the comparison of the mean scores of the treatment groups. The results showed that there were differences in conceptual understanding between students’ studying with CCM and DIM. Need to make conceptual changes will occur optimally if physics learning uses CCM.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
33.30%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信