再看看公元前1850年的两个埃及金字塔体积“公式”

IF 0.6 Q3 MATHEMATICS
R. Siegmund‐Schultze
{"title":"再看看公元前1850年的两个埃及金字塔体积“公式”","authors":"R. Siegmund‐Schultze","doi":"10.1080/26375451.2022.2106061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper provides some methodological, didactical, and historiographical reflections on Egyptian pyramid volume formulas, responding to suggestions by Paul Shutler from 2009. These suggestions partly reiterate a historically documented proof by the Chinese Liu Hui (third century CE), although Lui Hui’s contribution was apparently unknown to Shutler. The latter came forward, in addition, with intuitive arguments which might have been used by the Egyptians to convince themselves of the correctness of their formula for the volume of the full pyramid. In a broad sense, the reflections in this paper may contribute to the use of history in the mathematical classroom. As a cautionary note: The paper is an abridged version of a longer manuscript that contains detailed explanations and discussions of historical secondary sources. Since the paper is somewhat outside the usual canon of mathematics historiography, I have deposited the longer manuscript on .","PeriodicalId":36683,"journal":{"name":"British Journal for the History of Mathematics","volume":"37 1","pages":"171 - 178"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Another look at the two Egyptian pyramid volume ‘formulas’ of 1850 BCE\",\"authors\":\"R. Siegmund‐Schultze\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/26375451.2022.2106061\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper provides some methodological, didactical, and historiographical reflections on Egyptian pyramid volume formulas, responding to suggestions by Paul Shutler from 2009. These suggestions partly reiterate a historically documented proof by the Chinese Liu Hui (third century CE), although Lui Hui’s contribution was apparently unknown to Shutler. The latter came forward, in addition, with intuitive arguments which might have been used by the Egyptians to convince themselves of the correctness of their formula for the volume of the full pyramid. In a broad sense, the reflections in this paper may contribute to the use of history in the mathematical classroom. As a cautionary note: The paper is an abridged version of a longer manuscript that contains detailed explanations and discussions of historical secondary sources. Since the paper is somewhat outside the usual canon of mathematics historiography, I have deposited the longer manuscript on .\",\"PeriodicalId\":36683,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal for the History of Mathematics\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"171 - 178\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal for the History of Mathematics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/26375451.2022.2106061\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MATHEMATICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal for the History of Mathematics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/26375451.2022.2106061","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文对保罗·舒特勒(Paul Shutler) 2009年提出的建议,提供了一些关于埃及金字塔体积公式的方法论、教学法和史学反思。这些建议在一定程度上重申了中国刘辉(公元三世纪)的历史证据,尽管舒特勒显然不知道刘辉的贡献。此外,后者还提出了一些直观的论点,这些论点可能被埃及人用来说服自己,相信他们计算整个金字塔体积的公式是正确的。从广义上讲,本文的思考可能有助于在数学课堂上使用历史。值得注意的是:这篇论文是一篇较长的手稿的删节版,其中包含对历史第二手资料的详细解释和讨论。由于这篇论文在某种程度上超出了数学史学的通常标准,所以我把较长的原稿保留了下来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Another look at the two Egyptian pyramid volume ‘formulas’ of 1850 BCE
This paper provides some methodological, didactical, and historiographical reflections on Egyptian pyramid volume formulas, responding to suggestions by Paul Shutler from 2009. These suggestions partly reiterate a historically documented proof by the Chinese Liu Hui (third century CE), although Lui Hui’s contribution was apparently unknown to Shutler. The latter came forward, in addition, with intuitive arguments which might have been used by the Egyptians to convince themselves of the correctness of their formula for the volume of the full pyramid. In a broad sense, the reflections in this paper may contribute to the use of history in the mathematical classroom. As a cautionary note: The paper is an abridged version of a longer manuscript that contains detailed explanations and discussions of historical secondary sources. Since the paper is somewhat outside the usual canon of mathematics historiography, I have deposited the longer manuscript on .
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
British Journal for the History of Mathematics
British Journal for the History of Mathematics Arts and Humanities-History and Philosophy of Science
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信