{"title":"书评:法律、法官与视觉文化","authors":"Katherine Biber","doi":"10.1177/17438721221107180","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"other. I also wonder what are some operating concepts and assumptions other than naive realism that drive the uncritical equation of better visibility and better rule of law. I raise this question not to criticize the book for lacking consideration of other concepts. Rather, I do so to encourage the audience to read with multiple and more expansive theoretical lenses in order to do justice to the rich and deep content this book offers.","PeriodicalId":43886,"journal":{"name":"Law Culture and the Humanities","volume":"18 1","pages":"514 - 516"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Book Review: Law, Judges and Visual Culture\",\"authors\":\"Katherine Biber\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/17438721221107180\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"other. I also wonder what are some operating concepts and assumptions other than naive realism that drive the uncritical equation of better visibility and better rule of law. I raise this question not to criticize the book for lacking consideration of other concepts. Rather, I do so to encourage the audience to read with multiple and more expansive theoretical lenses in order to do justice to the rich and deep content this book offers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43886,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Law Culture and the Humanities\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"514 - 516\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Law Culture and the Humanities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/17438721221107180\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law Culture and the Humanities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17438721221107180","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
other. I also wonder what are some operating concepts and assumptions other than naive realism that drive the uncritical equation of better visibility and better rule of law. I raise this question not to criticize the book for lacking consideration of other concepts. Rather, I do so to encourage the audience to read with multiple and more expansive theoretical lenses in order to do justice to the rich and deep content this book offers.
期刊介绍:
Our mission is to publish high quality work at the intersection of scholarship on law, culture, and the humanities. All commentaries, articles and review essays are peer reviewed. We provide a publishing vehicle for scholars engaged in interdisciplinary, humanistically oriented legal scholarship. We publish a wide range of scholarship in legal history, legal theory and jurisprudence, law and cultural studies, law and literature, and legal hermeneutics.