动物园/水族馆工作人员与游客价值观、信仰和亲环境行为的差异:环境传播的后果

IF 1.6 Q3 HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM
J. Packer, R. Ballantyne, K. Hughes, J. Sneddon, J. Lee
{"title":"动物园/水族馆工作人员与游客价值观、信仰和亲环境行为的差异:环境传播的后果","authors":"J. Packer, R. Ballantyne, K. Hughes, J. Sneddon, J. Lee","doi":"10.1080/10645578.2022.2032927","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The value priorities, pro-environmental beliefs and pro-environmental behaviors of zoo/aquarium staff, volunteers, visitors and non-visitors are examined to test whether they differ in ways that may impact zoos’ effectiveness in communicating environmental messages. Online surveys were completed by 607 staff (including 157 educators), 339 volunteers, 1444 frequent visitors, 2321 occasional visitors and 350 non-visitors across 12 sites in North America and Australia. Multivariate analysis of variance was used to compare different categories of staff; and to compare educator, volunteer, visitor and non-visitor groups, in relation to their values and pro-environmental beliefs and behaviors. Educators and volunteers were found to ascribe greater importance to self-transcendence values than visitors, and this was reflected in their pro-environmental beliefs and behaviors. These differences may hinder educators’ ability to design and present environmental messages that resonate with current and potential visitors whose values may differ significantly from their own. Suggestions for mitigating this are discussed.","PeriodicalId":45516,"journal":{"name":"Visitor Studies","volume":"25 1","pages":"85 - 103"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Differences between Zoo/Aquarium Staff and Visitors’ Values, Beliefs, and Pro-Environmental Behaviors: Consequences for Environmental Communication\",\"authors\":\"J. Packer, R. Ballantyne, K. Hughes, J. Sneddon, J. Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10645578.2022.2032927\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The value priorities, pro-environmental beliefs and pro-environmental behaviors of zoo/aquarium staff, volunteers, visitors and non-visitors are examined to test whether they differ in ways that may impact zoos’ effectiveness in communicating environmental messages. Online surveys were completed by 607 staff (including 157 educators), 339 volunteers, 1444 frequent visitors, 2321 occasional visitors and 350 non-visitors across 12 sites in North America and Australia. Multivariate analysis of variance was used to compare different categories of staff; and to compare educator, volunteer, visitor and non-visitor groups, in relation to their values and pro-environmental beliefs and behaviors. Educators and volunteers were found to ascribe greater importance to self-transcendence values than visitors, and this was reflected in their pro-environmental beliefs and behaviors. These differences may hinder educators’ ability to design and present environmental messages that resonate with current and potential visitors whose values may differ significantly from their own. Suggestions for mitigating this are discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45516,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Visitor Studies\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"85 - 103\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Visitor Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10645578.2022.2032927\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Visitor Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10645578.2022.2032927","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

摘要对动物园/水族馆工作人员、志愿者、访客和非访客的价值优先顺序、环保信念和环保行为进行了调查,以测试他们在可能影响动物园传达环境信息的有效性方面的差异。607名工作人员(包括157名教育工作者)、339名志愿者、1444名常客、2321名偶尔访客和350名非访客在北美和澳大利亚的12个地点完成了在线调查。采用多变量方差分析对不同类别的工作人员进行比较;并比较教育工作者、志愿者、访客和非访客群体的价值观、环保信仰和行为。研究发现,教育工作者和志愿者比来访者更重视自我超越的价值观,这反映在他们的环保信仰和行为中。这些差异可能会阻碍教育工作者设计和呈现环境信息的能力,这些信息会引起当前和潜在访客的共鸣,而这些访客的价值观可能与他们自己的价值观存在重大差异。讨论了缓解这种情况的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Differences between Zoo/Aquarium Staff and Visitors’ Values, Beliefs, and Pro-Environmental Behaviors: Consequences for Environmental Communication
Abstract The value priorities, pro-environmental beliefs and pro-environmental behaviors of zoo/aquarium staff, volunteers, visitors and non-visitors are examined to test whether they differ in ways that may impact zoos’ effectiveness in communicating environmental messages. Online surveys were completed by 607 staff (including 157 educators), 339 volunteers, 1444 frequent visitors, 2321 occasional visitors and 350 non-visitors across 12 sites in North America and Australia. Multivariate analysis of variance was used to compare different categories of staff; and to compare educator, volunteer, visitor and non-visitor groups, in relation to their values and pro-environmental beliefs and behaviors. Educators and volunteers were found to ascribe greater importance to self-transcendence values than visitors, and this was reflected in their pro-environmental beliefs and behaviors. These differences may hinder educators’ ability to design and present environmental messages that resonate with current and potential visitors whose values may differ significantly from their own. Suggestions for mitigating this are discussed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Visitor Studies
Visitor Studies HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
13.30%
发文量
9
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信