Cephalus的自传叙事(变形记7.690–865):在史诗模式和修辞惯例之间

IF 0.2 3区 历史学 0 CLASSICS
ARETHUSA Pub Date : 2021-06-30 DOI:10.1353/are.2020.0014
Alessandra Romeo
{"title":"Cephalus的自传叙事(变形记7.690–865):在史诗模式和修辞惯例之间","authors":"Alessandra Romeo","doi":"10.1353/are.2020.0014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This paper treats Cephalus’s autobiographical account in Ovid’s Metamorphoses 7.690–865, a passage that has given rise to various and even contradictory interpretations. The present analysis takes a broader view of the problem of Cephalus’s credibility by relying on rhetorical concepts such as context and contents of speech. The Ovidian myth of Cephalus and Procris is configured as an epic scene (modeled on the hospitality scenes of the Homeric and Virgilian poems) in which the protagonist recounts his story of love and death to a young male audience. Cephalus’s communicative strategy aims at effecting pathos and veracity. Ovid has made an innovative selection between existing versions of the myth of Cephalus and Procris (among which are the preserved fragment of Pherecydes) in order to construct an authoritative character and an exemplary story.","PeriodicalId":44750,"journal":{"name":"ARETHUSA","volume":"53 1","pages":"157 - 174"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/are.2020.0014","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cephalus’s Autobiographical Narrative (Metamorphoses 7.690–865): Between Epic Models and the Conventions of Rhetoric\",\"authors\":\"Alessandra Romeo\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/are.2020.0014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:This paper treats Cephalus’s autobiographical account in Ovid’s Metamorphoses 7.690–865, a passage that has given rise to various and even contradictory interpretations. The present analysis takes a broader view of the problem of Cephalus’s credibility by relying on rhetorical concepts such as context and contents of speech. The Ovidian myth of Cephalus and Procris is configured as an epic scene (modeled on the hospitality scenes of the Homeric and Virgilian poems) in which the protagonist recounts his story of love and death to a young male audience. Cephalus’s communicative strategy aims at effecting pathos and veracity. Ovid has made an innovative selection between existing versions of the myth of Cephalus and Procris (among which are the preserved fragment of Pherecydes) in order to construct an authoritative character and an exemplary story.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44750,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ARETHUSA\",\"volume\":\"53 1\",\"pages\":\"157 - 174\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/are.2020.0014\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ARETHUSA\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/are.2020.0014\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"CLASSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ARETHUSA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/are.2020.0014","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"CLASSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:本文论述了在奥维德的《变形记》7.690–865中Cephalus的自传体叙述,这段话引发了各种甚至矛盾的解释。本文借助语境、言语内容等修辞概念,对Cephalus的可信度问题进行了较为全面的分析。Cephalus和Procris的Ovidian神话被配置为一个史诗场景(模仿荷马和弗吉尼亚诗歌中的好客场景),主人公在其中向年轻男性观众讲述他的爱与死亡故事。Cephalus的交际策略旨在实现悲情性和真实性。Ovid在Cephalus和Procris神话的现有版本之间进行了创新性的选择(其中包括Pherecydes的保留片段),以构建一个权威人物和一个模范故事。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cephalus’s Autobiographical Narrative (Metamorphoses 7.690–865): Between Epic Models and the Conventions of Rhetoric
Abstract:This paper treats Cephalus’s autobiographical account in Ovid’s Metamorphoses 7.690–865, a passage that has given rise to various and even contradictory interpretations. The present analysis takes a broader view of the problem of Cephalus’s credibility by relying on rhetorical concepts such as context and contents of speech. The Ovidian myth of Cephalus and Procris is configured as an epic scene (modeled on the hospitality scenes of the Homeric and Virgilian poems) in which the protagonist recounts his story of love and death to a young male audience. Cephalus’s communicative strategy aims at effecting pathos and veracity. Ovid has made an innovative selection between existing versions of the myth of Cephalus and Procris (among which are the preserved fragment of Pherecydes) in order to construct an authoritative character and an exemplary story.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ARETHUSA
ARETHUSA CLASSICS-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
期刊介绍: Arethusa is known for publishing original literary and cultural studies of the ancient world and of the field of classics that combine contemporary theoretical perspectives with more traditional approaches to literary and material evidence. Interdisciplinary in nature, this distinguished journal often features special thematic issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信