巴基斯坦反恐怖主义法对恐怖主义的定义

Q2 Social Sciences

Global Journal of Comparative Law Pub Date : 2018-08-14 DOI:10.1163/2211906X-00702003

Khurshid Iqbal, N. Shah

{"title":"巴基斯坦反恐怖主义法对恐怖主义的定义","authors":"Khurshid Iqbal, N. Shah","doi":"10.1163/2211906X-00702003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We critically examine the definition of ‘terrorism’ in the Anti-Terrorism Act 1997 of Pakistan and as it is interpreted by the Supreme Court of Pakistan under the principle of legality in criminal and human rights law standards.\n1\n We conclude that the definition of terrorism under the Anti-Terrorism Act does not pass the test of the principle of legality and the jurisprudence of the Supreme Court of Pakistan is inconsistent confounding the situation further. We recommend that Pakistan, following the principle of legality and human rights standards, amend the current definition of terrorism as an overbroad definition could be misused and abused leading to human rights violations.","PeriodicalId":38000,"journal":{"name":"Global Journal of Comparative Law","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1163/2211906X-00702003","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Defining Terrorism in Pakistani Anti-Terrorism Law\",\"authors\":\"Khurshid Iqbal, N. Shah\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/2211906X-00702003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We critically examine the definition of ‘terrorism’ in the Anti-Terrorism Act 1997 of Pakistan and as it is interpreted by the Supreme Court of Pakistan under the principle of legality in criminal and human rights law standards.\\n1\\n We conclude that the definition of terrorism under the Anti-Terrorism Act does not pass the test of the principle of legality and the jurisprudence of the Supreme Court of Pakistan is inconsistent confounding the situation further. We recommend that Pakistan, following the principle of legality and human rights standards, amend the current definition of terrorism as an overbroad definition could be misused and abused leading to human rights violations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38000,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Journal of Comparative Law\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-08-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1163/2211906X-00702003\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Journal of Comparative Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/2211906X-00702003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Journal of Comparative Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/2211906X-00702003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

我们严格审查了巴基斯坦1997年《反恐怖主义法》中“恐怖主义”的定义，因为巴基斯坦最高法院根据刑法和人权法标准的合法性原则对其进行了解释我们的结论是，根据《反恐怖主义法》对恐怖主义的定义没有通过合法性原则的检验，巴基斯坦最高法院的判例也不一致，进一步混淆了局势。我们建议巴基斯坦根据合法性原则和人权标准，修正目前对恐怖主义的定义，因为这一过于宽泛的定义可能被误用和滥用，导致侵犯人权。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Defining Terrorism in Pakistani Anti-Terrorism Law

We critically examine the definition of ‘terrorism’ in the Anti-Terrorism Act 1997 of Pakistan and as it is interpreted by the Supreme Court of Pakistan under the principle of legality in criminal and human rights law standards. 1 We conclude that the definition of terrorism under the Anti-Terrorism Act does not pass the test of the principle of legality and the jurisprudence of the Supreme Court of Pakistan is inconsistent confounding the situation further. We recommend that Pakistan, following the principle of legality and human rights standards, amend the current definition of terrorism as an overbroad definition could be misused and abused leading to human rights violations.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Global Journal of Comparative Law Social Sciences-Law

CiteScore

0.90

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Global Journal of Comparative Law is a peer reviewed periodical that provides a dynamic platform for the dissemination of ideas on comparative law and reports on developments in the field of comparative law from all parts of the world. In our contemporary globalized world, it is almost impossible to isolate developments in the law in one jurisdiction or society from another. At the same time, what is traditionally called comparative law is increasingly subsumed under aspects of International Law. The Global Journal of Comparative Law therefore aims to maintain the discipline of comparative legal studies as vigorous and dynamic by deepening the space for comparative work in its transnational context.