模型、对象和幽灵:可视化历史

IF 0.8 4区 管理学 Q1 HISTORY
David J. Staley, B. Asmussen
{"title":"模型、对象和幽灵:可视化历史","authors":"David J. Staley, B. Asmussen","doi":"10.1080/17449359.2023.2205203","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Why is contemporary academic history mainly practiced through writing, while visualization of history is msotly found in museums and in non-academic genres? This essay explores five different methods of visualizing history to provide a starting point for discussions of the value of visualizations. The methods are first historical paintings, either contemporary with the events depicted or created later for the promotion of narratives. Then models are explored, both physical and virtual, followed by the practice of using ghosts to recreate the human actors of the past. The last methods are imagetexts, as introduced to the theorist William J.T. Mitchell and finally objects as a way of representing historical data. As the field of historical visualization as vast and growing, this essay hopes to inspire further discussion on the matter and possible help change to focus on text alone in academic writing.","PeriodicalId":45724,"journal":{"name":"Management & Organizational History","volume":"18 1","pages":"97 - 110"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Models, objects, and ghosts: visualizing history\",\"authors\":\"David J. Staley, B. Asmussen\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17449359.2023.2205203\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Why is contemporary academic history mainly practiced through writing, while visualization of history is msotly found in museums and in non-academic genres? This essay explores five different methods of visualizing history to provide a starting point for discussions of the value of visualizations. The methods are first historical paintings, either contemporary with the events depicted or created later for the promotion of narratives. Then models are explored, both physical and virtual, followed by the practice of using ghosts to recreate the human actors of the past. The last methods are imagetexts, as introduced to the theorist William J.T. Mitchell and finally objects as a way of representing historical data. As the field of historical visualization as vast and growing, this essay hopes to inspire further discussion on the matter and possible help change to focus on text alone in academic writing.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45724,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Management & Organizational History\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"97 - 110\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Management & Organizational History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17449359.2023.2205203\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Management & Organizational History","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17449359.2023.2205203","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

为什么当代学术史主要是通过书写来实践的,而历史的形象化却很少出现在博物馆和非学术性流派中?本文探讨了可视化历史的五种不同方法,为可视化价值的讨论提供了一个起点。这些方法首先是历史绘画,要么与所描绘的事件同时代,要么是后来为促进叙事而创作的。然后探索模型,包括物理的和虚拟的,接着是用鬼魂来重现过去的人类演员的实践。最后一种方法是图像文本(imagettext),这是理论家威廉·j·t·米切尔(William J.T. Mitchell)提出的,最后一种方法是对象(objects),作为一种表示历史数据的方法。随着历史可视化领域的广泛和发展,本文希望能激发对这一问题的进一步讨论,并可能有助于改变学术写作中只关注文本的情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Models, objects, and ghosts: visualizing history
Abstract Why is contemporary academic history mainly practiced through writing, while visualization of history is msotly found in museums and in non-academic genres? This essay explores five different methods of visualizing history to provide a starting point for discussions of the value of visualizations. The methods are first historical paintings, either contemporary with the events depicted or created later for the promotion of narratives. Then models are explored, both physical and virtual, followed by the practice of using ghosts to recreate the human actors of the past. The last methods are imagetexts, as introduced to the theorist William J.T. Mitchell and finally objects as a way of representing historical data. As the field of historical visualization as vast and growing, this essay hopes to inspire further discussion on the matter and possible help change to focus on text alone in academic writing.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
16.70%
发文量
8
期刊介绍: Management & Organizational History (M&OH) is a quarterly, peer-reviewed journal that aims to publish high quality, original, academic research concerning historical approaches to the study of management, organizations and organizing. The journal addresses issues from all areas of management, organization studies, and related fields. The unifying theme of M&OH is its historical orientation. The journal is both empirical and theoretical. It seeks to advance innovative historical methods. It facilitates interdisciplinary dialogue, especially between business and management history and organization theory. The ethos of M&OH is reflective, ethical, imaginative, critical, inter-disciplinary, and international, as well as historical in orientation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信