板上词汇:基于表情图片命名的MEG研究

Q2 Arts and Humanities
Fatemeh Tabari
{"title":"板上词汇:基于表情图片命名的MEG研究","authors":"Fatemeh Tabari","doi":"10.29038/eejpl.2021.8.2.tab","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The cognitive processes associated with word retrieval and the investigation of word-picture differences are complex and not fully understood. Uttering a word entails orchestrating several steps as visual object recognition, accessing a lexical concept, lemma selection, lemma retrieval, accessing the morpheme(s) and generating the phonological word, and finally retrieving syllabic gestural scores and articulation. To study the mechanisms of word retrieval in lemma selection phase, we compared the three groups of monolingual, semi-bilingual and bilingual learners with respect to their topography and strength of Functional Connectivity (FC)values of the most highlighted pair of activated nodes in the time range of 0-150 ms in different frequency bands (delta, theta, alpha, beta, and gamma) upon application of the stimuli. We have seen no significant difference between difference frequency bands (p > 0.05) at the most highlighted FC pairs. However, we observed higher gamma values signifying the semantic activation of the word. We could not find any significant difference between the groups in terms of FC values at designated pairs of nodes signifying that different amount of exposure could not affect electrophysiological patterns in the preliminary step of word production. \nAcknowledgements \n This study was supported by the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology and the Portuguese Ministry of Science, Technology and Higher Education (UID/PSI/01662/2019), through the national funds (PIDDAC).","PeriodicalId":36553,"journal":{"name":"East European Journal of Psycholinguistics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lexicon on Board: A MEG Study Based on Expressive Picture-Naming\",\"authors\":\"Fatemeh Tabari\",\"doi\":\"10.29038/eejpl.2021.8.2.tab\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The cognitive processes associated with word retrieval and the investigation of word-picture differences are complex and not fully understood. Uttering a word entails orchestrating several steps as visual object recognition, accessing a lexical concept, lemma selection, lemma retrieval, accessing the morpheme(s) and generating the phonological word, and finally retrieving syllabic gestural scores and articulation. To study the mechanisms of word retrieval in lemma selection phase, we compared the three groups of monolingual, semi-bilingual and bilingual learners with respect to their topography and strength of Functional Connectivity (FC)values of the most highlighted pair of activated nodes in the time range of 0-150 ms in different frequency bands (delta, theta, alpha, beta, and gamma) upon application of the stimuli. We have seen no significant difference between difference frequency bands (p > 0.05) at the most highlighted FC pairs. However, we observed higher gamma values signifying the semantic activation of the word. We could not find any significant difference between the groups in terms of FC values at designated pairs of nodes signifying that different amount of exposure could not affect electrophysiological patterns in the preliminary step of word production. \\nAcknowledgements \\n This study was supported by the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology and the Portuguese Ministry of Science, Technology and Higher Education (UID/PSI/01662/2019), through the national funds (PIDDAC).\",\"PeriodicalId\":36553,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"East European Journal of Psycholinguistics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"East European Journal of Psycholinguistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29038/eejpl.2021.8.2.tab\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"East European Journal of Psycholinguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29038/eejpl.2021.8.2.tab","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

与词检索和词-图差异研究相关的认知过程是复杂的,尚未被完全理解。说出一个单词需要经过几个步骤:视觉对象识别,获取词汇概念,引理选择,引理检索,获取语素并生成音位词,最后检索音节手势得分和发音。为了研究引理选择阶段的词检索机制,我们比较了三组单语、半双语和双语学习者在不同频率(delta、theta、alpha、beta和gamma)的刺激作用下,在0-150 ms时间范围内最突出的一对激活节点的地形和功能连接(FC)值的强度。在最突出的FC对中,我们看到不同频段之间没有显著差异(p > 0.05)。然而,我们观察到更高的伽马值表示单词的语义激活。在指定的节点对上,我们没有发现两组之间的FC值有显著差异,这表明不同的暴露量不会影响单词生成的初级阶段的电生理模式。本研究由葡萄牙科学技术基金会和葡萄牙科学、技术和高等教育部(UID/PSI/01662/2019)通过国家基金(PIDDAC)支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Lexicon on Board: A MEG Study Based on Expressive Picture-Naming
The cognitive processes associated with word retrieval and the investigation of word-picture differences are complex and not fully understood. Uttering a word entails orchestrating several steps as visual object recognition, accessing a lexical concept, lemma selection, lemma retrieval, accessing the morpheme(s) and generating the phonological word, and finally retrieving syllabic gestural scores and articulation. To study the mechanisms of word retrieval in lemma selection phase, we compared the three groups of monolingual, semi-bilingual and bilingual learners with respect to their topography and strength of Functional Connectivity (FC)values of the most highlighted pair of activated nodes in the time range of 0-150 ms in different frequency bands (delta, theta, alpha, beta, and gamma) upon application of the stimuli. We have seen no significant difference between difference frequency bands (p > 0.05) at the most highlighted FC pairs. However, we observed higher gamma values signifying the semantic activation of the word. We could not find any significant difference between the groups in terms of FC values at designated pairs of nodes signifying that different amount of exposure could not affect electrophysiological patterns in the preliminary step of word production. Acknowledgements This study was supported by the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology and the Portuguese Ministry of Science, Technology and Higher Education (UID/PSI/01662/2019), through the national funds (PIDDAC).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
East European Journal of Psycholinguistics
East European Journal of Psycholinguistics Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信