培养员工积极的变革反应:桥接与缓冲策略的作用

IF 5.4 3区 材料科学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL
C. Yue
{"title":"培养员工积极的变革反应:桥接与缓冲策略的作用","authors":"C. Yue","doi":"10.1080/1062726X.2022.2093881","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This study examined how employees’ perceptions of organizations’ use of bridging and buffering public relations strategies affected their positive responses to organizational change. Drawing from two theoretical frameworks (i.e., social exchange theory and the strategic management of public relations), the current study tested three models that had employees’ openness to change as a mediator and three forms of behavioral support (i.e., compliance, cooperation, and championing) as outcomes. Through an online survey of 439 employees in the United States, this study found that perceived bridging strategies effectively induced employees’ openness to change, which in turn resulted in stronger behavioral compliance, cooperation, and championing for change. By contrast, while a perceived buffering strategy had a direct and positive association with employees’ compliance and cooperation, it did not enhance employees’ championing for change. Furthermore, perceived use of buffering strategies did not lead to employees’ openness to change.","PeriodicalId":4,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Energy Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fostering employees’ positive change reactions: the role of bridging and buffering strategies\",\"authors\":\"C. Yue\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/1062726X.2022.2093881\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This study examined how employees’ perceptions of organizations’ use of bridging and buffering public relations strategies affected their positive responses to organizational change. Drawing from two theoretical frameworks (i.e., social exchange theory and the strategic management of public relations), the current study tested three models that had employees’ openness to change as a mediator and three forms of behavioral support (i.e., compliance, cooperation, and championing) as outcomes. Through an online survey of 439 employees in the United States, this study found that perceived bridging strategies effectively induced employees’ openness to change, which in turn resulted in stronger behavioral compliance, cooperation, and championing for change. By contrast, while a perceived buffering strategy had a direct and positive association with employees’ compliance and cooperation, it did not enhance employees’ championing for change. Furthermore, perceived use of buffering strategies did not lead to employees’ openness to change.\",\"PeriodicalId\":4,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Energy Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Energy Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/1062726X.2022.2093881\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Energy Materials","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1062726X.2022.2093881","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

摘要本研究考察了员工对组织使用桥接和缓冲公共关系策略的看法如何影响他们对组织变革的积极反应。根据两个理论框架(即社会交换理论和公共关系战略管理),本研究测试了三种模型,其中员工对变革的开放性作为中介,三种形式的行为支持(即顺从、合作和支持)作为结果。通过对美国439名员工的在线调查,这项研究发现,感知的桥接策略有效地诱导了员工对变革的开放性,这反过来又导致了更强的行为合规性、合作性和对变革的支持。相比之下,虽然感知到的缓冲策略与员工的合规与合作有着直接而积极的联系,但它并没有增强员工对变革的支持。此外,缓冲策略的使用并没有导致员工对变革持开放态度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Fostering employees’ positive change reactions: the role of bridging and buffering strategies
ABSTRACT This study examined how employees’ perceptions of organizations’ use of bridging and buffering public relations strategies affected their positive responses to organizational change. Drawing from two theoretical frameworks (i.e., social exchange theory and the strategic management of public relations), the current study tested three models that had employees’ openness to change as a mediator and three forms of behavioral support (i.e., compliance, cooperation, and championing) as outcomes. Through an online survey of 439 employees in the United States, this study found that perceived bridging strategies effectively induced employees’ openness to change, which in turn resulted in stronger behavioral compliance, cooperation, and championing for change. By contrast, while a perceived buffering strategy had a direct and positive association with employees’ compliance and cooperation, it did not enhance employees’ championing for change. Furthermore, perceived use of buffering strategies did not lead to employees’ openness to change.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Energy Materials
ACS Applied Energy Materials Materials Science-Materials Chemistry
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
1368
期刊介绍: ACS Applied Energy Materials is an interdisciplinary journal publishing original research covering all aspects of materials, engineering, chemistry, physics and biology relevant to energy conversion and storage. The journal is devoted to reports of new and original experimental and theoretical research of an applied nature that integrate knowledge in the areas of materials, engineering, physics, bioscience, and chemistry into important energy applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信