决定青藏高原阴坡和阶地空间异质性的特殊物种

Pub Date : 2023-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.rcar.2023.03.001
XiaoMing Mou , YingWen Yu , Min Zhao , YuQiang Li , Masae Shiyomi
{"title":"决定青藏高原阴坡和阶地空间异质性的特殊物种","authors":"XiaoMing Mou ,&nbsp;YingWen Yu ,&nbsp;Min Zhao ,&nbsp;YuQiang Li ,&nbsp;Masae Shiyomi","doi":"10.1016/j.rcar.2023.03.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Spatial patterns of plant species and patchy community are important properties in grasslands. However, research regarding spatial patterns of formed patches with various species has not fully advanced until now. Our purpose is to clarify differences in spatial pattern formed by species and community constructed under shady and terrace habitats. The three common <em>Kobresia</em>-<em>Carex</em> patches (Size 1, 0.6–0.9 m<sup>2</sup>; Size 2, 3.0–3.8 m<sup>2</sup> and Size 3, 6.5–8.8 m<sup>2</sup>) were selected in shady and terrace on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau, and corresponding quadrats of 1m×1m, 2m×2m and 3m×3m were placed for S1, S2 and S3 patches, respectively. The surveyed quadrats were divided into 20cm×20cm large cells (L-cells), and further divided into four 10cm×10cm small cells (S-cells). We used the binary occurrence system (presence/absence data) to record occurrences of all species in S-cells. The analysis shows that the power law model was well able to determine the spatial distribution pattern of species or patchy community in shady and terrace. All species and patches show aggregated distribution in shady and terrace habitats. In the shady habitat, the relative spatial heterogeneity (<em>ε</em>) of individual plant species was lowest at presence frequency (<em>P</em>) of 0.1–0.3, whereas in the terrace habitat <em>ε</em> was lowest at <em>P</em> &lt;0.1, and ε increased monotonically with increasing <em>P</em>. For most dominant species, <em>P</em> and <em>ε</em> values were higher in terrace than those in shady. We concluded that the dominant species largely determine spatial heterogeneity of the <em>Kobresia</em>-<em>Carex</em> patches, while companion and rare species have weak influence on the community-level heterogeneity in shady and terrace habitats.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The particular species determining spatial heterogeneity in shady and terrace on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau, China\",\"authors\":\"XiaoMing Mou ,&nbsp;YingWen Yu ,&nbsp;Min Zhao ,&nbsp;YuQiang Li ,&nbsp;Masae Shiyomi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rcar.2023.03.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Spatial patterns of plant species and patchy community are important properties in grasslands. However, research regarding spatial patterns of formed patches with various species has not fully advanced until now. Our purpose is to clarify differences in spatial pattern formed by species and community constructed under shady and terrace habitats. The three common <em>Kobresia</em>-<em>Carex</em> patches (Size 1, 0.6–0.9 m<sup>2</sup>; Size 2, 3.0–3.8 m<sup>2</sup> and Size 3, 6.5–8.8 m<sup>2</sup>) were selected in shady and terrace on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau, and corresponding quadrats of 1m×1m, 2m×2m and 3m×3m were placed for S1, S2 and S3 patches, respectively. The surveyed quadrats were divided into 20cm×20cm large cells (L-cells), and further divided into four 10cm×10cm small cells (S-cells). We used the binary occurrence system (presence/absence data) to record occurrences of all species in S-cells. The analysis shows that the power law model was well able to determine the spatial distribution pattern of species or patchy community in shady and terrace. All species and patches show aggregated distribution in shady and terrace habitats. In the shady habitat, the relative spatial heterogeneity (<em>ε</em>) of individual plant species was lowest at presence frequency (<em>P</em>) of 0.1–0.3, whereas in the terrace habitat <em>ε</em> was lowest at <em>P</em> &lt;0.1, and ε increased monotonically with increasing <em>P</em>. For most dominant species, <em>P</em> and <em>ε</em> values were higher in terrace than those in shady. We concluded that the dominant species largely determine spatial heterogeneity of the <em>Kobresia</em>-<em>Carex</em> patches, while companion and rare species have weak influence on the community-level heterogeneity in shady and terrace habitats.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":0,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2097158323000137\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2097158323000137","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

植物物种和斑块群落的空间格局是草地的重要特征。然而,对不同物种形成斑块的空间格局的研究迄今尚未取得充分进展。我们的目的是澄清在阴凉和阶地生境下物种和群落形成的空间格局的差异。三种常见的矮嵩草-苔草斑块(尺寸1,0.6-0.9 m2;在青藏高原的林荫道和阶地中选择尺寸为2、3.0 ~ 3.8 m2和尺寸为3、6.5 ~ 8.8 m2的样方,分别在S1、S2和S3斑块上设置1m×1m、2m×2m和3m×3m。将调查样方分为20cm×20cm大细胞(l细胞),并进一步分为4个10cm×10cm小细胞(s细胞)。我们使用二元出现系统(存在/不存在数据)记录s细胞中所有物种的出现情况。分析表明,幂律模型能较好地确定林荫和阶地中物种或斑块群落的空间分布格局。所有物种和斑块在阴凉和阶地生境中均呈聚集分布。在遮荫生境中,单株植物的相对空间异质性(ε)在存在频率(P)为0.1 ~ 0.3时最低,而在阶地生境中,ε值随P的增加而单调增加。大多数优势种的P和ε值在阶地均高于遮荫生境。结果表明,优势种在很大程度上决定了矮嵩草-苔草斑块的空间异质性,而伴侣种和稀有种对林荫和阶地生境的群落异质性影响较小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享
查看原文
The particular species determining spatial heterogeneity in shady and terrace on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau, China

Spatial patterns of plant species and patchy community are important properties in grasslands. However, research regarding spatial patterns of formed patches with various species has not fully advanced until now. Our purpose is to clarify differences in spatial pattern formed by species and community constructed under shady and terrace habitats. The three common Kobresia-Carex patches (Size 1, 0.6–0.9 m2; Size 2, 3.0–3.8 m2 and Size 3, 6.5–8.8 m2) were selected in shady and terrace on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau, and corresponding quadrats of 1m×1m, 2m×2m and 3m×3m were placed for S1, S2 and S3 patches, respectively. The surveyed quadrats were divided into 20cm×20cm large cells (L-cells), and further divided into four 10cm×10cm small cells (S-cells). We used the binary occurrence system (presence/absence data) to record occurrences of all species in S-cells. The analysis shows that the power law model was well able to determine the spatial distribution pattern of species or patchy community in shady and terrace. All species and patches show aggregated distribution in shady and terrace habitats. In the shady habitat, the relative spatial heterogeneity (ε) of individual plant species was lowest at presence frequency (P) of 0.1–0.3, whereas in the terrace habitat ε was lowest at P <0.1, and ε increased monotonically with increasing P. For most dominant species, P and ε values were higher in terrace than those in shady. We concluded that the dominant species largely determine spatial heterogeneity of the Kobresia-Carex patches, while companion and rare species have weak influence on the community-level heterogeneity in shady and terrace habitats.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信