移动应用程序开发方法的比较分析

Q4 Physics and Astronomy
Mohamed Abdal Mohsin Masaad Alsaid, T. M. Ahmed, S. Jan, F. Khan, Mohammad, A. Khattak
{"title":"移动应用程序开发方法的比较分析","authors":"Mohamed Abdal Mohsin Masaad Alsaid, T. M. Ahmed, S. Jan, F. Khan, Mohammad, A. Khattak","doi":"10.53560/ppasa(58-1)717","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Over the last decade, there has been a significant increase in the development of mobile applications. The performance of the developed applications depends largely on the development approaches. There are two widely used approaches: (1) native, where the application is targeted and developed for a specific platform, (2) crossplatform, where the developed application runs on multiple platforms. This paper aims to address the question of which approach should be used in various scenarios. We have performed a detailed comparison of the two approaches by developing a mobile app using both approaches. Experiments are performed using Android and iOS, the two most well-known mobile Operating System. The criteria of deciding the best approach include performance, usability and support. Our results show that both approaches are viable depending on the requirements and type of the application to be developed, with native having an edge. Guidelines are presented at the end to help the developers in choosing the best approach. The fundamental differences and advantages of each approach are discussed.","PeriodicalId":36961,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Pakistan Academy of Sciences: Part A","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparative Analysis of Mobile Application Development Approaches\",\"authors\":\"Mohamed Abdal Mohsin Masaad Alsaid, T. M. Ahmed, S. Jan, F. Khan, Mohammad, A. Khattak\",\"doi\":\"10.53560/ppasa(58-1)717\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Over the last decade, there has been a significant increase in the development of mobile applications. The performance of the developed applications depends largely on the development approaches. There are two widely used approaches: (1) native, where the application is targeted and developed for a specific platform, (2) crossplatform, where the developed application runs on multiple platforms. This paper aims to address the question of which approach should be used in various scenarios. We have performed a detailed comparison of the two approaches by developing a mobile app using both approaches. Experiments are performed using Android and iOS, the two most well-known mobile Operating System. The criteria of deciding the best approach include performance, usability and support. Our results show that both approaches are viable depending on the requirements and type of the application to be developed, with native having an edge. Guidelines are presented at the end to help the developers in choosing the best approach. The fundamental differences and advantages of each approach are discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36961,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the Pakistan Academy of Sciences: Part A\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the Pakistan Academy of Sciences: Part A\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.53560/ppasa(58-1)717\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Physics and Astronomy\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Pakistan Academy of Sciences: Part A","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53560/ppasa(58-1)717","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Physics and Astronomy","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

在过去的十年里,移动应用程序的开发有了显著的增长。开发的应用程序的性能在很大程度上取决于开发方法。有两种广泛使用的方法:(1)本机,其中应用程序是针对特定平台开发的;(2)跨平台,其中开发的应用程序在多个平台上运行。本文旨在解决在各种情况下应使用哪种方法的问题。我们通过使用这两种方法开发移动应用程序,对这两种方式进行了详细的比较。实验是使用Android和iOS这两个最知名的移动操作系统进行的。决定最佳方法的标准包括性能、可用性和支持。我们的结果表明,这两种方法都是可行的,这取决于要开发的应用程序的需求和类型,而原生方法具有优势。最后给出了指导方针,以帮助开发人员选择最佳方法。讨论了每种方法的基本区别和优点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Comparative Analysis of Mobile Application Development Approaches
Over the last decade, there has been a significant increase in the development of mobile applications. The performance of the developed applications depends largely on the development approaches. There are two widely used approaches: (1) native, where the application is targeted and developed for a specific platform, (2) crossplatform, where the developed application runs on multiple platforms. This paper aims to address the question of which approach should be used in various scenarios. We have performed a detailed comparison of the two approaches by developing a mobile app using both approaches. Experiments are performed using Android and iOS, the two most well-known mobile Operating System. The criteria of deciding the best approach include performance, usability and support. Our results show that both approaches are viable depending on the requirements and type of the application to be developed, with native having an edge. Guidelines are presented at the end to help the developers in choosing the best approach. The fundamental differences and advantages of each approach are discussed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Proceedings of the Pakistan Academy of Sciences: Part A
Proceedings of the Pakistan Academy of Sciences: Part A Computer Science-Computer Science (all)
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信