《伪装中的魔鬼》:对马基雅维利主义工具的测试(马赫IV、马基雅维利人格量表和五因素马基雅维利论量表)

IF 0.5 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Beata Grabovac, Bojana M. Dinić
{"title":"《伪装中的魔鬼》:对马基雅维利主义工具的测试(马赫IV、马基雅维利人格量表和五因素马基雅维利论量表)","authors":"Beata Grabovac, Bojana M. Dinić","doi":"10.19090/pp.v15i3.2391","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The main aim of this study was to test the the convergent, discriminant, and criterion validity of the Serbian adaptations of three Machiavellianism instruments (Mach-IV, Machiavellian Personality Scale - MPS, and Five Factor Machiavellianism Inventory - FFMI) based on their relations with HEXACO traits, distress aspects (anxiety, depression, and stress), and emotion regulation strategies (supression and reapraisal). The sample included 195 participants (80% women). The results showed that the Mach-IV and the MPS are mutually more similar to each other and their main negative correlate is Honesty-Humility, while the FFMI appears as distant from the other instruments and its main positive correlates are Extraversion and Conscientiousness and a negative one is Emotionality. Furthermore, the Mach-IV and MPS showed positive relations with distress aspects and non-adaptive emotion regulation (supression), while the FFMI showed opposite patterns of relations. Since the FFMI captures the most items and facets, it explained the most variance of distress and regulation strategies, but the Mach-IV and the MPS, especially its amorality facet, showed significant incremental contribution in explanation of anxiety, stress, and suppression. The implications of the use of each of the three instruments are discussed.","PeriodicalId":43074,"journal":{"name":"Primenjena Psihologija","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“The Devil in Disguise”: A Test of Machiavellianism Instruments (the Mach-IV, the Machiavellian Personality Scale, and the Five Factor Machiavellianism Inventory)\",\"authors\":\"Beata Grabovac, Bojana M. Dinić\",\"doi\":\"10.19090/pp.v15i3.2391\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The main aim of this study was to test the the convergent, discriminant, and criterion validity of the Serbian adaptations of three Machiavellianism instruments (Mach-IV, Machiavellian Personality Scale - MPS, and Five Factor Machiavellianism Inventory - FFMI) based on their relations with HEXACO traits, distress aspects (anxiety, depression, and stress), and emotion regulation strategies (supression and reapraisal). The sample included 195 participants (80% women). The results showed that the Mach-IV and the MPS are mutually more similar to each other and their main negative correlate is Honesty-Humility, while the FFMI appears as distant from the other instruments and its main positive correlates are Extraversion and Conscientiousness and a negative one is Emotionality. Furthermore, the Mach-IV and MPS showed positive relations with distress aspects and non-adaptive emotion regulation (supression), while the FFMI showed opposite patterns of relations. Since the FFMI captures the most items and facets, it explained the most variance of distress and regulation strategies, but the Mach-IV and the MPS, especially its amorality facet, showed significant incremental contribution in explanation of anxiety, stress, and suppression. The implications of the use of each of the three instruments are discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43074,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Primenjena Psihologija\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Primenjena Psihologija\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.19090/pp.v15i3.2391\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Primenjena Psihologija","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19090/pp.v15i3.2391","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本研究的主要目的是基于三种马基雅维利主义工具(Mach IV、马基雅维利人格量表-MPS和五因素马基雅维利论量表-FFMI)与HEXACO特征、痛苦方面(焦虑、抑郁和压力)的关系,检验其塞尔维亚语改编的收敛性、判别性和标准有效性,情绪调节策略(抑制和再评价)。样本包括195名参与者(80%为女性)。结果表明,Mach IV和MPS彼此更相似,它们的主要负相关是诚实-谦逊,而FFMI似乎与其他仪器一样遥远,它的主要正相关是外向和认真,负相关是情感。此外,Mach IV和MPS与痛苦方面和非适应性情绪调节(抑制)呈正相关,而FFMI则表现出相反的关系模式。由于FFMI涵盖了最多的项目和方面,它解释了痛苦和调节策略的最大变化,但Mach IV和MPS,尤其是其非道德方面,在解释焦虑、压力和抑制方面显示出显著的增量贡献。讨论了使用这三项文书中每一项文书的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
“The Devil in Disguise”: A Test of Machiavellianism Instruments (the Mach-IV, the Machiavellian Personality Scale, and the Five Factor Machiavellianism Inventory)
The main aim of this study was to test the the convergent, discriminant, and criterion validity of the Serbian adaptations of three Machiavellianism instruments (Mach-IV, Machiavellian Personality Scale - MPS, and Five Factor Machiavellianism Inventory - FFMI) based on their relations with HEXACO traits, distress aspects (anxiety, depression, and stress), and emotion regulation strategies (supression and reapraisal). The sample included 195 participants (80% women). The results showed that the Mach-IV and the MPS are mutually more similar to each other and their main negative correlate is Honesty-Humility, while the FFMI appears as distant from the other instruments and its main positive correlates are Extraversion and Conscientiousness and a negative one is Emotionality. Furthermore, the Mach-IV and MPS showed positive relations with distress aspects and non-adaptive emotion regulation (supression), while the FFMI showed opposite patterns of relations. Since the FFMI captures the most items and facets, it explained the most variance of distress and regulation strategies, but the Mach-IV and the MPS, especially its amorality facet, showed significant incremental contribution in explanation of anxiety, stress, and suppression. The implications of the use of each of the three instruments are discussed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Primenjena Psihologija
Primenjena Psihologija PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Applied Psychology publishes original papers, brief communications, and review articles that deal with diverse areas of research in applied psychology including, but not limited to, organizational, social, educational, developmental, mental health, counseling, and sport psychology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信