宝琳·史密斯在《珠子》中的形式主义

IF 0.1 0 LITERATURE
N. Meihuizen
{"title":"宝琳·史密斯在《珠子》中的形式主义","authors":"N. Meihuizen","doi":"10.1080/18125441.2017.1381759","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT While critics over the years have paid attention to Smith’s formalism, certain authoritative voices (I think in particular of J. M. Coetzee and Nadine Gordimer) focus on ideological aspects of her writing, which minimise or overlook its quality and its own particular character. If we could appreciate that Smith was writing within a modernist sphere of influence— however much filtered by her own sense of her specific abilities (and her compulsion to express those abilities)—it would be easier to read her as we tend to read other modernists. That is, we might once again read her in terms of writerly techniques used, and an aesthetic approach that absorbs into itself the patterns and tensions of existence, and which cannot simply be judged in terms of its colluding in various degrees with the forces of society. My article argues that ideological readings of Smith do her craftsmanship scant justice. As a corrective, I provide an overview of the formalist techniques she uses and the dense structuration involved in her presentation of her themes. Her formalism imbues the writing itself with a sense of its own agency, its own unique power, to the benefit of her fictional constructions.","PeriodicalId":41487,"journal":{"name":"Scrutiny2-Issues in English Studies in Southern Africa","volume":"22 1","pages":"26 - 39"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/18125441.2017.1381759","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pauline Smith’s Formalism in The Beadle\",\"authors\":\"N. Meihuizen\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/18125441.2017.1381759\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT While critics over the years have paid attention to Smith’s formalism, certain authoritative voices (I think in particular of J. M. Coetzee and Nadine Gordimer) focus on ideological aspects of her writing, which minimise or overlook its quality and its own particular character. If we could appreciate that Smith was writing within a modernist sphere of influence— however much filtered by her own sense of her specific abilities (and her compulsion to express those abilities)—it would be easier to read her as we tend to read other modernists. That is, we might once again read her in terms of writerly techniques used, and an aesthetic approach that absorbs into itself the patterns and tensions of existence, and which cannot simply be judged in terms of its colluding in various degrees with the forces of society. My article argues that ideological readings of Smith do her craftsmanship scant justice. As a corrective, I provide an overview of the formalist techniques she uses and the dense structuration involved in her presentation of her themes. Her formalism imbues the writing itself with a sense of its own agency, its own unique power, to the benefit of her fictional constructions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41487,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scrutiny2-Issues in English Studies in Southern Africa\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"26 - 39\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/18125441.2017.1381759\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scrutiny2-Issues in English Studies in Southern Africa\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/18125441.2017.1381759\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scrutiny2-Issues in English Studies in Southern Africa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/18125441.2017.1381759","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要:尽管多年来评论家们一直关注史密斯的形式主义,但某些权威的声音(我认为尤其是库切和戈迪默)关注的是她作品的意识形态方面,这些声音最小化或忽视了作品的质量和其自身的特性。如果我们能意识到史密斯是在现代主义的影响范围内写作的——无论她自己对自己特定能力的感觉(以及她表达这些能力的冲动)如何过滤——阅读她会比阅读其他现代主义者更容易。也就是说,我们可能会再次从所使用的写作技巧和美学方法的角度来解读她,这种美学方法吸收了存在的模式和张力,而不能简单地从它在不同程度上与社会力量的勾结来判断。我的文章认为,对史密斯的意识形态解读对她的技艺缺乏公正性。作为纠正,我概述了她使用的形式主义技巧,以及她在展示主题时所涉及的密集结构。她的形式主义给写作本身注入了一种自我代理的感觉,一种独特的力量,这得益于她的虚构结构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pauline Smith’s Formalism in The Beadle
ABSTRACT While critics over the years have paid attention to Smith’s formalism, certain authoritative voices (I think in particular of J. M. Coetzee and Nadine Gordimer) focus on ideological aspects of her writing, which minimise or overlook its quality and its own particular character. If we could appreciate that Smith was writing within a modernist sphere of influence— however much filtered by her own sense of her specific abilities (and her compulsion to express those abilities)—it would be easier to read her as we tend to read other modernists. That is, we might once again read her in terms of writerly techniques used, and an aesthetic approach that absorbs into itself the patterns and tensions of existence, and which cannot simply be judged in terms of its colluding in various degrees with the forces of society. My article argues that ideological readings of Smith do her craftsmanship scant justice. As a corrective, I provide an overview of the formalist techniques she uses and the dense structuration involved in her presentation of her themes. Her formalism imbues the writing itself with a sense of its own agency, its own unique power, to the benefit of her fictional constructions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
期刊介绍: scrutiny2 is a double blind peer-reviewed journal that publishes original manuscripts on theoretical and practical concerns in English literary studies in southern Africa, particularly tertiary education. Uniquely southern African approaches to southern African concerns are sought, although manuscripts of a more general nature will be considered. The journal is aimed at an audience of specialists in English literary studies. While the dominant form of manuscripts published will be the scholarly article, the journal will also publish poetry, as well as other forms of writing such as the essay, review essay, conference report and polemical position piece. This journal is accredited with the South African Department of Higher Education and Training.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信