基于抗裂材料的马歇尔试验评价方法研究

Q4 Materials Science

Cailiao Daobao/Materials Review Pub Date : 2018-02-06 DOI:10.1061/9780784481240.007

L. Liu

{"title":"基于抗裂材料的马歇尔试验评价方法研究","authors":"L. Liu","doi":"10.1061/9780784481240.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"According to the research shortage of Marshall test method in anti-cracking material application,in accordance with results of gyratory compaction test for different number of Marshall compaction test,with porosity as evaluation indexes,the best compaction times of Marshall test of anti-cracking layer material was determined as double compaction 75 times.Through the regression of gyratory compaction test and Marshall test results,and combined with the characteristics of anti-crack material and related technical specification,determined the technical requirements of Marshall test which is suitable for anti-cracking layer material,got the optimal asphalt content was 7.5%,which was close to gyratory compaction test results 7.6%.The experimental results showed that:the research of Marshall test method for anti-cracking material has certain accuracy and reliability.The study results can provide important reference for determining the optimal asphalt content of anti-cracking material and the popularization and application of anti-crack material in road reconstruction project.","PeriodicalId":37461,"journal":{"name":"Cailiao Daobao/Materials Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1061/9780784481240.007","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Research on Marshall Test Evaluation Method Based on Anti-cracking Material\",\"authors\":\"L. Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1061/9780784481240.007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"According to the research shortage of Marshall test method in anti-cracking material application,in accordance with results of gyratory compaction test for different number of Marshall compaction test,with porosity as evaluation indexes,the best compaction times of Marshall test of anti-cracking layer material was determined as double compaction 75 times.Through the regression of gyratory compaction test and Marshall test results,and combined with the characteristics of anti-crack material and related technical specification,determined the technical requirements of Marshall test which is suitable for anti-cracking layer material,got the optimal asphalt content was 7.5%,which was close to gyratory compaction test results 7.6%.The experimental results showed that:the research of Marshall test method for anti-cracking material has certain accuracy and reliability.The study results can provide important reference for determining the optimal asphalt content of anti-cracking material and the popularization and application of anti-crack material in road reconstruction project.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37461,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cailiao Daobao/Materials Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-02-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1061/9780784481240.007\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cailiao Daobao/Materials Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1089\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784481240.007\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Materials Science\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cailiao Daobao/Materials Review","FirstCategoryId":"1089","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784481240.007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Materials Science","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

摘要

针对马歇尔试验方法在抗裂材料应用中的研究不足，根据不同马歇尔压实试验次数的回转压实试验结果，以孔隙率为评价指标，确定抗裂层材料马歇尔试验的最佳压实次数为双重压实75次。通过回转压实试验和马歇尔试验结果的回归，结合抗裂材料的特性及相关技术规范，确定了适用于抗裂层材料的马歇尔试验技术要求，得到最佳沥青含量为7.5%，试验结果表明：马歇尔抗裂材料试验方法的研究具有一定的准确性和可靠性。研究结果可为确定抗裂材料的最佳沥青含量以及抗裂材料在道路改造工程中的推广应用提供重要参考。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Research on Marshall Test Evaluation Method Based on Anti-cracking Material

According to the research shortage of Marshall test method in anti-cracking material application,in accordance with results of gyratory compaction test for different number of Marshall compaction test,with porosity as evaluation indexes,the best compaction times of Marshall test of anti-cracking layer material was determined as double compaction 75 times.Through the regression of gyratory compaction test and Marshall test results,and combined with the characteristics of anti-crack material and related technical specification,determined the technical requirements of Marshall test which is suitable for anti-cracking layer material,got the optimal asphalt content was 7.5%,which was close to gyratory compaction test results 7.6%.The experimental results showed that:the research of Marshall test method for anti-cracking material has certain accuracy and reliability.The study results can provide important reference for determining the optimal asphalt content of anti-cracking material and the popularization and application of anti-crack material in road reconstruction project.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Cailiao Daobao/Materials Review Materials Science-Materials Science (all)

CiteScore

1.20

自引率

0.00%

发文量

1802

期刊介绍： Materials Reports (MR) publishes articles which focus on, but are not limited to, the following areas. I.　Innovative functional materials, including new energy materials, optical/electro-nic/magnetic materials, biomedical materials, materials for environment protection and remediation, etc. II.　Advanced structural materials, including structural ceramics, metal materials, civil engineering materials, surface engineering and material connection, composite materials, polymer materials, etc. It is hereby declared that since January 2019, the English title of the Chinese journal Materials Review (Cailiao Daobao) has been changed to Materials Reports, and its original English title Materials Review is invalid. We appreciate your support and look forward your sustained attention to our journal.