理解支持概念信息设计的影响

Q3 Social Sciences
S. Pontis
{"title":"理解支持概念信息设计的影响","authors":"S. Pontis","doi":"10.1075/IDJ.20015.FON","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This article argues that supporting conceptual information design should be a priority as it could better equip\n design practitioners for their jobs. Findings from a longitudinal evaluation of a tool – MapCI Cards – using multiple methods to\n assess the impact of supporting conceptual design in professional practice are reported here. Internal and external factors\n emerged as having an adverse influence on information designers’ responses to conceptual design. Increased conceptual design\n awareness and more confident decisions resulted from working with a support tool. Structure, flexibility, and externalizations are\n indicated as possible ways to effectively support conceptual information design. The article ends with recommendations for future\n support tools.","PeriodicalId":35109,"journal":{"name":"Information Design Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding the impact of supporting conceptual information design\",\"authors\":\"S. Pontis\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/IDJ.20015.FON\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n This article argues that supporting conceptual information design should be a priority as it could better equip\\n design practitioners for their jobs. Findings from a longitudinal evaluation of a tool – MapCI Cards – using multiple methods to\\n assess the impact of supporting conceptual design in professional practice are reported here. Internal and external factors\\n emerged as having an adverse influence on information designers’ responses to conceptual design. Increased conceptual design\\n awareness and more confident decisions resulted from working with a support tool. Structure, flexibility, and externalizations are\\n indicated as possible ways to effectively support conceptual information design. The article ends with recommendations for future\\n support tools.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35109,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Information Design Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Information Design Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/IDJ.20015.FON\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information Design Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/IDJ.20015.FON","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文认为,支持概念信息设计应该是一个优先事项,因为它可以更好地为设计从业者的工作提供装备。本文报告了对MapCI卡工具的纵向评估结果,该工具使用多种方法来评估支持概念设计在专业实践中的影响。内部和外部因素对信息设计者对概念设计的反应产生了不利影响。使用支持工具提高了概念设计意识,做出了更加自信的决策。结构、灵活性和外部化是有效支持概念信息设计的可能方式。文章最后对未来的支持工具提出了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Understanding the impact of supporting conceptual information design
This article argues that supporting conceptual information design should be a priority as it could better equip design practitioners for their jobs. Findings from a longitudinal evaluation of a tool – MapCI Cards – using multiple methods to assess the impact of supporting conceptual design in professional practice are reported here. Internal and external factors emerged as having an adverse influence on information designers’ responses to conceptual design. Increased conceptual design awareness and more confident decisions resulted from working with a support tool. Structure, flexibility, and externalizations are indicated as possible ways to effectively support conceptual information design. The article ends with recommendations for future support tools.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Information Design Journal
Information Design Journal Social Sciences-Library and Information Sciences
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: Information Design Journal (IDJ) is a peer reviewed international journal that bridges the gap between research and practice in information design. IDJ is a platform for discussing and improving the design, usability, and overall effectiveness of ‘content put into form’ — of verbal and visual messages shaped to meet the needs of particular audiences. IDJ offers a forum for sharing ideas about the verbal, visual, and typographic design of print and online documents, multimedia presentations, illustrations, signage, interfaces, maps, quantitative displays, websites, and new media. IDJ brings together ways of thinking about creating effective communications for use in contexts such as workplaces, hospitals, airports, banks, schools, or government agencies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信