巴基斯坦dii khan地区轻度和重度妊高征妇女与正常妊高征妇女胎盘直径、厚度和子叶数量的比较

IF 0.5 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Shehla Aman, S. Arif, Amir A. Amanullah, Jamshed Khan, Sarah Yunus, Usman Ullah
{"title":"巴基斯坦dii khan地区轻度和重度妊高征妇女与正常妊高征妇女胎盘直径、厚度和子叶数量的比较","authors":"Shehla Aman, S. Arif, Amir A. Amanullah, Jamshed Khan, Sarah Yunus, Usman Ullah","doi":"10.46903/GJMS/18.04.839","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Pregnancy induced hypertension (PIH) adversely affects the development of placenta and growth of fetus. The objectives of this study were to compare the placental diameter, placental thickness and number of cotyledons in mild PIH and severe PIH women versus normotensive women of District D.I.Khan, Pakistan.Material Methods: This comparative cross-sectional study was conducted in Department of Anatomy, Gomal Medical College, D.I.Khan, Pakistan from January to October 2014. Three samples were selected; each of size 50, group 1 normotensive/ control, group 2 with mild PIH and group 3 with severe PIH. Three research variables; placental diameter (cm), thickness (mm) and number of cotyledons were measured on ratio scale for three groups. Descriptive analysis included mean± SD with 95% confidence intervals for each group separately. With three groups on ratio data, one way-ANOVA test was applied to see significance of difference between three groups. Post hoc Dunnett’s t test was applied at alpha 0.05 to see difference of mild PIH group 2 to normotensive/ control group 1 and of severe PIH group 3 to normotensive/ control group 1separately.Results: Mean placental diameter was 18.28±2.15, 16.57±1.94 and 16.18±1.75 cm and mean placental thickness was 19.33 ±3.70, 19.18±2.78 and 17.60±3.52 mm in group 1, 2 and 3 respectively. Mean number of cotyledons was 14.42±2.25, 14.08±2.30 and 13.16±2.15 in group 1, 2, and 3 respectively. Placental diameter was statistically significantly lower in group 2 (p=.00001) and 3 (p=.00001) than group 1. Placental thickness in group 2 (p=.957) was similar to group 1, while in group 3 (p=.019) it was lower than group 1. Number of cotyledons in group 2 (p=.666) was similar to group 1, while in group 3 (p=.011) it was lower than group 1.Conclusion: In mild pregnancy induced hypertension (PIH), placental diameter was lower than normotensives, while placental thickness and number of cotyledons were similar to normotensives. In severe PIH, placental diameter, placental thickness and number of cotyledons were all lower than normotensives. It is concluded that in mild PIH, the development of placenta is mildly affected, while in severe PIH, the development of placenta is severely affected.","PeriodicalId":44174,"journal":{"name":"Gomal Journal of Medical Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PLACENTAL DIAMETER AND THICKNESS AND NUMBER OF COTYLEDONS IN MILD AND SEVERE PREGNANCY INDUCED HYPERTENSIVE WOMEN VERSUS NORMOTENSIVE WOMEN OF DISTRICT D.I.KHAN, PAKISTAN\",\"authors\":\"Shehla Aman, S. Arif, Amir A. Amanullah, Jamshed Khan, Sarah Yunus, Usman Ullah\",\"doi\":\"10.46903/GJMS/18.04.839\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Pregnancy induced hypertension (PIH) adversely affects the development of placenta and growth of fetus. The objectives of this study were to compare the placental diameter, placental thickness and number of cotyledons in mild PIH and severe PIH women versus normotensive women of District D.I.Khan, Pakistan.Material Methods: This comparative cross-sectional study was conducted in Department of Anatomy, Gomal Medical College, D.I.Khan, Pakistan from January to October 2014. Three samples were selected; each of size 50, group 1 normotensive/ control, group 2 with mild PIH and group 3 with severe PIH. Three research variables; placental diameter (cm), thickness (mm) and number of cotyledons were measured on ratio scale for three groups. Descriptive analysis included mean± SD with 95% confidence intervals for each group separately. With three groups on ratio data, one way-ANOVA test was applied to see significance of difference between three groups. Post hoc Dunnett’s t test was applied at alpha 0.05 to see difference of mild PIH group 2 to normotensive/ control group 1 and of severe PIH group 3 to normotensive/ control group 1separately.Results: Mean placental diameter was 18.28±2.15, 16.57±1.94 and 16.18±1.75 cm and mean placental thickness was 19.33 ±3.70, 19.18±2.78 and 17.60±3.52 mm in group 1, 2 and 3 respectively. Mean number of cotyledons was 14.42±2.25, 14.08±2.30 and 13.16±2.15 in group 1, 2, and 3 respectively. Placental diameter was statistically significantly lower in group 2 (p=.00001) and 3 (p=.00001) than group 1. Placental thickness in group 2 (p=.957) was similar to group 1, while in group 3 (p=.019) it was lower than group 1. Number of cotyledons in group 2 (p=.666) was similar to group 1, while in group 3 (p=.011) it was lower than group 1.Conclusion: In mild pregnancy induced hypertension (PIH), placental diameter was lower than normotensives, while placental thickness and number of cotyledons were similar to normotensives. In severe PIH, placental diameter, placental thickness and number of cotyledons were all lower than normotensives. It is concluded that in mild PIH, the development of placenta is mildly affected, while in severe PIH, the development of placenta is severely affected.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44174,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gomal Journal of Medical Sciences\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gomal Journal of Medical Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.46903/GJMS/18.04.839\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gomal Journal of Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46903/GJMS/18.04.839","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:妊高征(PIH)对胎盘发育和胎儿生长有不利影响。本研究的目的是比较巴基斯坦D.I.Khan地区轻度和重度妊高征妇女与正常妊高征妇女的胎盘直径、胎盘厚度和子叶数量。材料方法:本比较横断面研究于2014年1 - 10月在巴基斯坦dii khan的Gomal医学院解剖学系进行。选取三个样本;各50例,1组为正常/对照组,2组为轻度PIH, 3组为重度PIH。三个研究变量;采用比值法测定各组胎盘直径(cm)、厚度(mm)和子叶数。描述性分析采用均数±标准差,每组分别有95%可信区间。三组对比值资料,采用单因素方差分析(one - way-ANOVA)检验三组间差异的显著性。轻度PIH 2组与正常/对照1组、重度PIH 3组与正常/对照1组的差异采用α 0.05的事后Dunnett t检验。结果:1、2、3组平均胎盘直径分别为18.28±2.15、16.57±1.94、16.18±1.75 cm,平均胎盘厚度分别为19.33±3.70、19.18±2.78、17.60±3.52 mm。1、2、3组平均子叶数分别为14.42±2.25、14.08±2.30、13.16±2.15。组2 (p= 0.00001)、组3 (p= 0.00001)胎盘直径均低于组1 (p= 0.00001)。2组胎盘厚度与1组相近(p= 0.957), 3组胎盘厚度低于1组(p= 0.019)。2组子叶数与1组相近(p= 0.666), 3组子叶数低于1组(p= 0.011)。结论:轻度妊高征患者胎盘直径小于正常妊高征患者,胎盘厚度和子叶数量与正常妊高征患者相近。重度妊高征时,胎盘直径、厚度和子叶数均低于正常值。由此可见,在轻度PIH中,胎盘发育受到轻度影响,而在重度PIH中,胎盘发育受到严重影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
PLACENTAL DIAMETER AND THICKNESS AND NUMBER OF COTYLEDONS IN MILD AND SEVERE PREGNANCY INDUCED HYPERTENSIVE WOMEN VERSUS NORMOTENSIVE WOMEN OF DISTRICT D.I.KHAN, PAKISTAN
Background: Pregnancy induced hypertension (PIH) adversely affects the development of placenta and growth of fetus. The objectives of this study were to compare the placental diameter, placental thickness and number of cotyledons in mild PIH and severe PIH women versus normotensive women of District D.I.Khan, Pakistan.Material Methods: This comparative cross-sectional study was conducted in Department of Anatomy, Gomal Medical College, D.I.Khan, Pakistan from January to October 2014. Three samples were selected; each of size 50, group 1 normotensive/ control, group 2 with mild PIH and group 3 with severe PIH. Three research variables; placental diameter (cm), thickness (mm) and number of cotyledons were measured on ratio scale for three groups. Descriptive analysis included mean± SD with 95% confidence intervals for each group separately. With three groups on ratio data, one way-ANOVA test was applied to see significance of difference between three groups. Post hoc Dunnett’s t test was applied at alpha 0.05 to see difference of mild PIH group 2 to normotensive/ control group 1 and of severe PIH group 3 to normotensive/ control group 1separately.Results: Mean placental diameter was 18.28±2.15, 16.57±1.94 and 16.18±1.75 cm and mean placental thickness was 19.33 ±3.70, 19.18±2.78 and 17.60±3.52 mm in group 1, 2 and 3 respectively. Mean number of cotyledons was 14.42±2.25, 14.08±2.30 and 13.16±2.15 in group 1, 2, and 3 respectively. Placental diameter was statistically significantly lower in group 2 (p=.00001) and 3 (p=.00001) than group 1. Placental thickness in group 2 (p=.957) was similar to group 1, while in group 3 (p=.019) it was lower than group 1. Number of cotyledons in group 2 (p=.666) was similar to group 1, while in group 3 (p=.011) it was lower than group 1.Conclusion: In mild pregnancy induced hypertension (PIH), placental diameter was lower than normotensives, while placental thickness and number of cotyledons were similar to normotensives. In severe PIH, placental diameter, placental thickness and number of cotyledons were all lower than normotensives. It is concluded that in mild PIH, the development of placenta is mildly affected, while in severe PIH, the development of placenta is severely affected.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Gomal Journal of Medical Sciences
Gomal Journal of Medical Sciences MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
80.00%
发文量
37
审稿时长
40 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信