作为“悖论”的阅读障碍

IF 0.9 Q3 EDUCATION, SPECIAL

British Journal of Special Education Pub Date : 2023-09-04 DOI:10.1111/1467-8578.12481

Craig Collinson

{"title":"作为“悖论”的阅读障碍","authors":"Craig Collinson","doi":"10.1111/1467-8578.12481","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article is written by a dyslexic scholar in opposition to the psychological discourse on dyslexia. The methodological approach adopted is ordinary language philosophy; I argue that dyslexia is a paradoxical concept. As such, dyslexia as a concept lacks clarity and cohesion. The alternative concept of Lexism (the Othering of and discrimination against dyslexics by normative practices and assumptions of literacy) is a more helpful concept for those who wish to understand the nature of a dyslexic's existence.</p>","PeriodicalId":46054,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Special Education","volume":"50 4","pages":"440-449"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://nasenjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1467-8578.12481","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dyslexia as ‘paradox’\",\"authors\":\"Craig Collinson\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1467-8578.12481\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This article is written by a dyslexic scholar in opposition to the psychological discourse on dyslexia. The methodological approach adopted is ordinary language philosophy; I argue that dyslexia is a paradoxical concept. As such, dyslexia as a concept lacks clarity and cohesion. The alternative concept of Lexism (the Othering of and discrimination against dyslexics by normative practices and assumptions of literacy) is a more helpful concept for those who wish to understand the nature of a dyslexic's existence.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46054,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of Special Education\",\"volume\":\"50 4\",\"pages\":\"440-449\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://nasenjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1467-8578.12481\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of Special Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-8578.12481\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SPECIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Special Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-8578.12481","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇文章是由一位阅读障碍学者写的，反对关于阅读障碍的心理学话语。所采用的方法论方法是普通语言哲学；我认为阅读障碍是一个自相矛盾的概念。因此，阅读障碍作为一个概念缺乏清晰度和凝聚力。词汇主义的另一个概念（通过规范实践和识字假设对阅读障碍者的另类和歧视）对那些希望理解阅读障碍者存在本质的人来说是一个更有用的概念。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Dyslexia as ‘paradox’

This article is written by a dyslexic scholar in opposition to the psychological discourse on dyslexia. The methodological approach adopted is ordinary language philosophy; I argue that dyslexia is a paradoxical concept. As such, dyslexia as a concept lacks clarity and cohesion. The alternative concept of Lexism (the Othering of and discrimination against dyslexics by normative practices and assumptions of literacy) is a more helpful concept for those who wish to understand the nature of a dyslexic's existence.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

British Journal of Special Education EDUCATION, SPECIAL-

CiteScore

1.90

自引率

15.40%

发文量

期刊介绍： This well-established and respected journal covers the whole range of learning difficulties relating to children in mainstream and special schools. It is widely read by nasen members as well as other practitioners, administrators advisers, teacher educators and researchers in the UK and overseas. The British Journal of Special Education is concerned with a wide range of special educational needs, and covers all levels of education pre-school, school, and post-school.