拉丁美洲的红与黑:桑达利奥·容科与“黑人问题”

Q2 Arts and Humanities
A. Mahler
{"title":"拉丁美洲的红与黑:桑达利奥·容科与“黑人问题”","authors":"A. Mahler","doi":"10.1080/14743892.2018.1435054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"During two historically unprecedented events in May–June 1929, communist and trade union organizers and intellectuals from across Latin America came together and discussed how to combat the exploitation of black and indigenous labor in the region. The speeches and debates on the so-called Negro and Indigenous Questions at the founding conference of the Confederation of Latin American Labor Unions in Montevideo and at the First Latin American Communist Conference in Buenos Aires initiated a debate on the complexities of the intersections of race and class in Latin America that continues to resonate today. Although understudied, related scholarship tends to recognize these two conferences for their contributions to an examination of indigenous labor through the interventions of Peruvian philosopher Jos e Carlos Mari ategui. However, it was in this same context where Afro-Cuban union organizer Sandalio Junco, whose work I consider in this essay, presented a little known yet foundational text of black internationalism that provided an analysis of the conditions faced by black workers in the Americas. In this speech, “The Problem of the Negro and the Proletarian Movement,” and his subsequent comments, Sandalio Junco disagreed with Mari ategui’s strict differentiation between black and indigenous experiences and rejected some of the conference participants’ dismissal of the presence of anti-black racism both among the Latin American working classes and in Latin American societies more broadly. In contrast to these positions, Junco drew comparisons between black Latin Americans’ experiences of racialization and those of other racialized populations throughout the hemisphere, such as indigenous peoples, U.S. African Americans, and West Indian migrant workers. Through these comparisons, he significantly theorized the overlap between anti-","PeriodicalId":35150,"journal":{"name":"American Communist History","volume":"17 1","pages":"16 - 32"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14743892.2018.1435054","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Red and the Black in Latin America: Sandalio Junco and the “Negro Question” from an Afro-Latin American Perspective\",\"authors\":\"A. Mahler\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14743892.2018.1435054\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"During two historically unprecedented events in May–June 1929, communist and trade union organizers and intellectuals from across Latin America came together and discussed how to combat the exploitation of black and indigenous labor in the region. The speeches and debates on the so-called Negro and Indigenous Questions at the founding conference of the Confederation of Latin American Labor Unions in Montevideo and at the First Latin American Communist Conference in Buenos Aires initiated a debate on the complexities of the intersections of race and class in Latin America that continues to resonate today. Although understudied, related scholarship tends to recognize these two conferences for their contributions to an examination of indigenous labor through the interventions of Peruvian philosopher Jos e Carlos Mari ategui. However, it was in this same context where Afro-Cuban union organizer Sandalio Junco, whose work I consider in this essay, presented a little known yet foundational text of black internationalism that provided an analysis of the conditions faced by black workers in the Americas. In this speech, “The Problem of the Negro and the Proletarian Movement,” and his subsequent comments, Sandalio Junco disagreed with Mari ategui’s strict differentiation between black and indigenous experiences and rejected some of the conference participants’ dismissal of the presence of anti-black racism both among the Latin American working classes and in Latin American societies more broadly. In contrast to these positions, Junco drew comparisons between black Latin Americans’ experiences of racialization and those of other racialized populations throughout the hemisphere, such as indigenous peoples, U.S. African Americans, and West Indian migrant workers. Through these comparisons, he significantly theorized the overlap between anti-\",\"PeriodicalId\":35150,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Communist History\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"16 - 32\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14743892.2018.1435054\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Communist History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14743892.2018.1435054\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Communist History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14743892.2018.1435054","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

在1929年5月至6月的两次历史上前所未有的事件中,来自拉丁美洲各地的共产主义和工会组织者以及知识分子聚集在一起,讨论如何打击该地区对黑人和土著劳工的剥削。在蒙得维的亚举行的拉丁美洲工会联合会成立大会和在布宜诺斯艾利斯举行的第一届拉丁美洲共产主义会议上,关于所谓黑人和土著问题的演讲和辩论,引发了一场关于拉丁美洲种族和阶级交叉点复杂性的辩论,直到今天仍在引起共鸣。虽然研究不足,但相关学者倾向于承认这两个会议通过秘鲁哲学家何塞·卡洛斯·马里·阿特吉的介入对土著劳动的研究做出了贡献。然而,正是在同样的背景下,非裔古巴工会组织者Sandalio Junco,我在这篇文章中提到了他的工作,提出了一个鲜为人知的黑人国际主义的基础文本,提供了对美洲黑人工人所面临的条件的分析。在这篇题为“黑人和无产阶级运动的问题”的演讲中,以及他随后的评论中,Sandalio Junco不同意Mari ategui对黑人和土著经验的严格区分,并拒绝了一些会议参与者对拉丁美洲工人阶级和拉丁美洲社会中反黑人种族主义存在的忽视。与这些观点形成鲜明对比的是,Junco将拉丁美洲黑人的种族化经历与整个西半球其他种族化人群的种族化经历进行了比较,例如土著居民、美国非裔美国人和西印度移民工人。通过这些比较,他显著地理论化了反-
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Red and the Black in Latin America: Sandalio Junco and the “Negro Question” from an Afro-Latin American Perspective
During two historically unprecedented events in May–June 1929, communist and trade union organizers and intellectuals from across Latin America came together and discussed how to combat the exploitation of black and indigenous labor in the region. The speeches and debates on the so-called Negro and Indigenous Questions at the founding conference of the Confederation of Latin American Labor Unions in Montevideo and at the First Latin American Communist Conference in Buenos Aires initiated a debate on the complexities of the intersections of race and class in Latin America that continues to resonate today. Although understudied, related scholarship tends to recognize these two conferences for their contributions to an examination of indigenous labor through the interventions of Peruvian philosopher Jos e Carlos Mari ategui. However, it was in this same context where Afro-Cuban union organizer Sandalio Junco, whose work I consider in this essay, presented a little known yet foundational text of black internationalism that provided an analysis of the conditions faced by black workers in the Americas. In this speech, “The Problem of the Negro and the Proletarian Movement,” and his subsequent comments, Sandalio Junco disagreed with Mari ategui’s strict differentiation between black and indigenous experiences and rejected some of the conference participants’ dismissal of the presence of anti-black racism both among the Latin American working classes and in Latin American societies more broadly. In contrast to these positions, Junco drew comparisons between black Latin Americans’ experiences of racialization and those of other racialized populations throughout the hemisphere, such as indigenous peoples, U.S. African Americans, and West Indian migrant workers. Through these comparisons, he significantly theorized the overlap between anti-
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American Communist History
American Communist History Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信