我们是如何维护东盟的和平的?我们如何确保它在东南亚各国人民中的承诺人文主义范式初探

IF 0.7 Q3 POLITICAL SCIENCE
K. H. Villanueva
{"title":"我们是如何维护东盟的和平的?我们如何确保它在东南亚各国人民中的承诺人文主义范式初探","authors":"K. H. Villanueva","doi":"10.1080/14781158.2022.2036116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Is humanity – a global human community – possible? I suggest that it is not only possible, but is an immanent world in certain places such as East/Southeast-Asia. This possibility emerges from what I call the original encounter – in which primordial spaces in the global realm are constituted by never-old, self-determining, and evolutionary political communities inside as well as outside of the logic of the state. The paper begins by asking: If we, the peoples, exist and respect each other as equals, how then do we come together and agree on our ideas, sentiments, beliefs, and interests as a divided community? Behind the question is a pragmatic purpose. A fifty-year peace has reigned among ASEAN states. But how did we keep this project alive? How can we extend and deepen it? The ‘original encounter’ I explore is a normative proposition. It comprises eight postulates which form aspects and dimensions of a world we inhabit but which we do not see in its totality – a gem in the rough. The objective of the paper is not to complete an answer, but provide enough evidence to raise a fundamental question: Can ASEAN be conceptualised as a community of peoples?","PeriodicalId":44867,"journal":{"name":"Global Change Peace & Security","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How have we kept the peace in ASEAN and how can we secure its promise among all peoples in Southeast Asia?: preliminary reflections on a humanist paradigm\",\"authors\":\"K. H. Villanueva\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14781158.2022.2036116\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Is humanity – a global human community – possible? I suggest that it is not only possible, but is an immanent world in certain places such as East/Southeast-Asia. This possibility emerges from what I call the original encounter – in which primordial spaces in the global realm are constituted by never-old, self-determining, and evolutionary political communities inside as well as outside of the logic of the state. The paper begins by asking: If we, the peoples, exist and respect each other as equals, how then do we come together and agree on our ideas, sentiments, beliefs, and interests as a divided community? Behind the question is a pragmatic purpose. A fifty-year peace has reigned among ASEAN states. But how did we keep this project alive? How can we extend and deepen it? The ‘original encounter’ I explore is a normative proposition. It comprises eight postulates which form aspects and dimensions of a world we inhabit but which we do not see in its totality – a gem in the rough. The objective of the paper is not to complete an answer, but provide enough evidence to raise a fundamental question: Can ASEAN be conceptualised as a community of peoples?\",\"PeriodicalId\":44867,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Change Peace & Security\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Change Peace & Security\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14781158.2022.2036116\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Change Peace & Security","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14781158.2022.2036116","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要人类——一个全球性的人类共同体——有可能吗?我认为这不仅是可能的,而且在东亚/东南亚等某些地方是一个内在的世界。这种可能性源于我所说的最初的相遇——在这种相遇中,全球领域的原始空间由国家逻辑内外从未过时的、自我决定的、进化的政治社区构成。这篇论文首先提出了一个问题:如果我们各国人民平等地存在并相互尊重,那么作为一个分裂的社区,我们如何团结起来,就我们的想法、情感、信仰和利益达成一致?这个问题的背后是一个务实的目的。东盟国家之间实现了五十年的和平。但我们是如何让这个项目继续下去的呢?我们如何扩展和深化它?我探索的“原始相遇”是一个规范性命题。它由八个假设组成,这些假设构成了我们所居住的世界的各个方面和维度,但我们并没有从整体上看到——一颗粗糙的宝石。本文的目的不是完成一个答案,而是提供足够的证据来提出一个根本问题:东盟能否被概念化为一个民族共同体?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How have we kept the peace in ASEAN and how can we secure its promise among all peoples in Southeast Asia?: preliminary reflections on a humanist paradigm
ABSTRACT Is humanity – a global human community – possible? I suggest that it is not only possible, but is an immanent world in certain places such as East/Southeast-Asia. This possibility emerges from what I call the original encounter – in which primordial spaces in the global realm are constituted by never-old, self-determining, and evolutionary political communities inside as well as outside of the logic of the state. The paper begins by asking: If we, the peoples, exist and respect each other as equals, how then do we come together and agree on our ideas, sentiments, beliefs, and interests as a divided community? Behind the question is a pragmatic purpose. A fifty-year peace has reigned among ASEAN states. But how did we keep this project alive? How can we extend and deepen it? The ‘original encounter’ I explore is a normative proposition. It comprises eight postulates which form aspects and dimensions of a world we inhabit but which we do not see in its totality – a gem in the rough. The objective of the paper is not to complete an answer, but provide enough evidence to raise a fundamental question: Can ASEAN be conceptualised as a community of peoples?
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Global Change Peace & Security
Global Change Peace & Security POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信