氯己定、聚维酮碘和戊二醛用于正畸器具消毒的体外抗菌活性比较研究

IF 0.1 Q4 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Mary Violet Jeyapriya, S.D.Milling Tania, Sonali Rathore, Sheloni Missier, Bevin Shaga, Mary Violet, Jeyapriya Post Graduate
{"title":"氯己定、聚维酮碘和戊二醛用于正畸器具消毒的体外抗菌活性比较研究","authors":"Mary Violet Jeyapriya, S.D.Milling Tania, Sonali Rathore, Sheloni Missier, Bevin Shaga, Mary Violet, Jeyapriya Post Graduate","doi":"10.56501/intjorthodrehabil.v14i1.675","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Orthodontist must take precautionary measures to protect patients from cross-infection by contaminated materials received from the manufacturers. To minimize the incidence of cross-infection prior to bonding an invitro study was done to assess the antibacterial activity of chlorhexidine, povidone iodine and glutaraldehyde.\nAim: To compare the antibacterial activity of 2% chlorhexidine, 5% povidone iodine and 2% glutaraldehyde on orthodontic materials prior to bonding.\nMaterials and methods: A total of 36 samples were included in this  study. The main group consists of 3 disinfectants and one control group (n =4). Group -1(Chlorhexidine gluconate), Group - 2 (Povidone Iodine), Group - 3 (Glutaraldehyde) and Group - 4 (Control group –untreated). Each group consists of 3 subgroups of the tested samples namely group A (brackets), group B (archwires) and group C - molar bands (n=9). which were contaminated by 3 bacterial species streptococcus, staphylococcus, lactobacillus and the number of colonies were counted before disinfection. The contaminated samples were subjected to disinfection with 2% chlorhexidine for 5 minutes 2% glutaraldehyde and 5% Povidone Iodine for 10 minutes. 20µl of sample of the disinfected samples were incubated and the number of colonies were counted after disinfection.\nResults: There were no colonies formed when 5% Povidone iodine was used to disinfect archwires and molarbands in few tested samples. 2% glutaraldehyde and 2% chlorhexidine were not effective against lactobacillus species. Povidone iodine was effective when compared to glutaraldehyde and chlorhexidine gluconate and effective against all the three species namely Streptococcus, Staphylococcus and Lactobacilli species. The obtained p-value is < 0.001 which is statistically significant when all groups were compared overall.\nConclusion: Disinfection with 5% povidone iodine was most effective when compared with 2% chlorhexidine and 2% glutaraldehyde.","PeriodicalId":29888,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Orthodontic Rehabilitation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Evaluation of Antibacterial Activity of Chlorhexidine, Povidone Iodine and Glutaraldehyde for Disinfection of Orthodontic Appliances - An In-Vitro Study\",\"authors\":\"Mary Violet Jeyapriya, S.D.Milling Tania, Sonali Rathore, Sheloni Missier, Bevin Shaga, Mary Violet, Jeyapriya Post Graduate\",\"doi\":\"10.56501/intjorthodrehabil.v14i1.675\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Orthodontist must take precautionary measures to protect patients from cross-infection by contaminated materials received from the manufacturers. To minimize the incidence of cross-infection prior to bonding an invitro study was done to assess the antibacterial activity of chlorhexidine, povidone iodine and glutaraldehyde.\\nAim: To compare the antibacterial activity of 2% chlorhexidine, 5% povidone iodine and 2% glutaraldehyde on orthodontic materials prior to bonding.\\nMaterials and methods: A total of 36 samples were included in this  study. The main group consists of 3 disinfectants and one control group (n =4). Group -1(Chlorhexidine gluconate), Group - 2 (Povidone Iodine), Group - 3 (Glutaraldehyde) and Group - 4 (Control group –untreated). Each group consists of 3 subgroups of the tested samples namely group A (brackets), group B (archwires) and group C - molar bands (n=9). which were contaminated by 3 bacterial species streptococcus, staphylococcus, lactobacillus and the number of colonies were counted before disinfection. The contaminated samples were subjected to disinfection with 2% chlorhexidine for 5 minutes 2% glutaraldehyde and 5% Povidone Iodine for 10 minutes. 20µl of sample of the disinfected samples were incubated and the number of colonies were counted after disinfection.\\nResults: There were no colonies formed when 5% Povidone iodine was used to disinfect archwires and molarbands in few tested samples. 2% glutaraldehyde and 2% chlorhexidine were not effective against lactobacillus species. Povidone iodine was effective when compared to glutaraldehyde and chlorhexidine gluconate and effective against all the three species namely Streptococcus, Staphylococcus and Lactobacilli species. The obtained p-value is < 0.001 which is statistically significant when all groups were compared overall.\\nConclusion: Disinfection with 5% povidone iodine was most effective when compared with 2% chlorhexidine and 2% glutaraldehyde.\",\"PeriodicalId\":29888,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Orthodontic Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Orthodontic Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.56501/intjorthodrehabil.v14i1.675\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Orthodontic Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56501/intjorthodrehabil.v14i1.675","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:正畸医生必须采取预防措施,以保护患者免受从制造商收到的污染材料的交叉感染。为了尽量减少粘接前交叉感染的发生率,我们进行了一项体外研究来评估氯己定、聚维酮碘和戊二醛的抗菌活性。目的:比较2%氯己定、5%聚维酮碘和2%戊二醛在正畸材料粘接前的抗菌活性。材料与方法:本研究共纳入36份样本。主组由3种消毒剂和1个对照组(n =4)组成。1组(葡萄糖酸氯己定)、2组(聚维酮碘)、3组(戊二醛)和4组(对照组)。每组由测试样品的3个亚组组成,即A组(托架),B组(拱线)和C组-摩尔带(n=9)。消毒前对被链球菌、葡萄球菌、乳酸菌3种细菌污染的样品进行菌落计数。用2%氯己定、2%戊二醛、5%聚维酮碘消毒5分钟。将消毒后的样品孵育20µl,消毒后计数菌落数。结果:用5%聚维酮碘消毒弧线和磨牙带时,少数样品未形成菌落。2%戊二醛和2%氯己定对乳酸菌无抑制作用。聚维酮碘与戊二醛和葡萄糖酸氯己定比较,对链球菌、葡萄球菌和乳酸菌均有效。得到的p值< 0.001,当所有组进行整体比较时具有统计学意义。结论:5%聚维酮碘消毒效果优于2%氯己定和2%戊二醛。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative Evaluation of Antibacterial Activity of Chlorhexidine, Povidone Iodine and Glutaraldehyde for Disinfection of Orthodontic Appliances - An In-Vitro Study
Introduction: Orthodontist must take precautionary measures to protect patients from cross-infection by contaminated materials received from the manufacturers. To minimize the incidence of cross-infection prior to bonding an invitro study was done to assess the antibacterial activity of chlorhexidine, povidone iodine and glutaraldehyde. Aim: To compare the antibacterial activity of 2% chlorhexidine, 5% povidone iodine and 2% glutaraldehyde on orthodontic materials prior to bonding. Materials and methods: A total of 36 samples were included in this  study. The main group consists of 3 disinfectants and one control group (n =4). Group -1(Chlorhexidine gluconate), Group - 2 (Povidone Iodine), Group - 3 (Glutaraldehyde) and Group - 4 (Control group –untreated). Each group consists of 3 subgroups of the tested samples namely group A (brackets), group B (archwires) and group C - molar bands (n=9). which were contaminated by 3 bacterial species streptococcus, staphylococcus, lactobacillus and the number of colonies were counted before disinfection. The contaminated samples were subjected to disinfection with 2% chlorhexidine for 5 minutes 2% glutaraldehyde and 5% Povidone Iodine for 10 minutes. 20µl of sample of the disinfected samples were incubated and the number of colonies were counted after disinfection. Results: There were no colonies formed when 5% Povidone iodine was used to disinfect archwires and molarbands in few tested samples. 2% glutaraldehyde and 2% chlorhexidine were not effective against lactobacillus species. Povidone iodine was effective when compared to glutaraldehyde and chlorhexidine gluconate and effective against all the three species namely Streptococcus, Staphylococcus and Lactobacilli species. The obtained p-value is < 0.001 which is statistically significant when all groups were compared overall. Conclusion: Disinfection with 5% povidone iodine was most effective when compared with 2% chlorhexidine and 2% glutaraldehyde.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Orthodontic Rehabilitation
International Journal of Orthodontic Rehabilitation DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信