我们认为什么结论是合理的?先验概率对先验概率的影响

Q3 Social Sciences
Decyzje Pub Date : 2018-06-15 DOI:10.7206/DEC.1733-0092.102
A. Wojtowicz
{"title":"我们认为什么结论是合理的?先验概率对先验概率的影响","authors":"A. Wojtowicz","doi":"10.7206/DEC.1733-0092.102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Empirical data suggest, that in many situations people are not able to estimate the probability of events on the base of available information in a way consistent with the normative model. This fact infl uences the choice of conclusions which are considered to be rational. The article outlines the factors that may affect the assumed value of a priori probability and – indirectly – the value of a posteriori probability. All these factors will be collectively referred to as the parameter j. Its value depends on the context in which the reasoning is made. In the article I show, that a critical assessment of our reasoning is not always justified.","PeriodicalId":37255,"journal":{"name":"Decyzje","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Jakie wnioski uznajemy za racjonalne? Wpływ prawdopodobieństwa apriorycznego na prawdopodobieństwo aposterioryczne\",\"authors\":\"A. Wojtowicz\",\"doi\":\"10.7206/DEC.1733-0092.102\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Empirical data suggest, that in many situations people are not able to estimate the probability of events on the base of available information in a way consistent with the normative model. This fact infl uences the choice of conclusions which are considered to be rational. The article outlines the factors that may affect the assumed value of a priori probability and – indirectly – the value of a posteriori probability. All these factors will be collectively referred to as the parameter j. Its value depends on the context in which the reasoning is made. In the article I show, that a critical assessment of our reasoning is not always justified.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37255,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Decyzje\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-06-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Decyzje\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7206/DEC.1733-0092.102\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Decyzje","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7206/DEC.1733-0092.102","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

经验数据表明,在许多情况下,人们无法根据现有信息以符合规范模型的方式估计事件的概率。这一事实影响了被认为是合理的结论的选择。这篇文章概述了可能影响先验概率假设值和间接影响后验概率值的因素。所有这些因素将统称为参数j。其值取决于进行推理的上下文。在我展示的文章中,对我们的推理进行批判性评估并不总是合理的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Jakie wnioski uznajemy za racjonalne? Wpływ prawdopodobieństwa apriorycznego na prawdopodobieństwo aposterioryczne
Empirical data suggest, that in many situations people are not able to estimate the probability of events on the base of available information in a way consistent with the normative model. This fact infl uences the choice of conclusions which are considered to be rational. The article outlines the factors that may affect the assumed value of a priori probability and – indirectly – the value of a posteriori probability. All these factors will be collectively referred to as the parameter j. Its value depends on the context in which the reasoning is made. In the article I show, that a critical assessment of our reasoning is not always justified.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Decyzje
Decyzje Social Sciences-Law
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信