图像与所显示的内容有何关系--摄影在南印度巴达加斯人中的应用

IF 0.4 Q3 ANTHROPOLOGY
F. Heidemann
{"title":"图像与所显示的内容有何关系--摄影在南印度巴达加斯人中的应用","authors":"F. Heidemann","doi":"10.1080/08949468.2022.2017246","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"“ How does a photograph relate to what it shows? ” This is a central conundrum of photography and is debated in academic journals as well as across the coffee-table. We find the two kinds of partial answer at the end-points of a long continuum. On the one side, the first approach, it is claimed that photography is like a fingerprint or a face mask, an unbiased copy of a (visual) impression, and what we see has actually happened. Thus two aircraft flew into the Twin Towers (in 2001), the cruiser Costa Concordia was shipwrecked (in 2012), and Donald Trump met Kim Jong Un (in 2018). On the other hand, a second approach rejects this view: photographs are not documents but commentaries; they do not reflect but construct the world, because they show just one moment and from one perspective; they can be modified in the post-production, and themselves become objects of subjective reading. Each view on this particular relationship of the picture and the depicted cannot ignore the other side. first counts. paradox dialectics is that eye","PeriodicalId":44055,"journal":{"name":"Visual Anthropology","volume":"35 1","pages":"80 - 92"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How Does an Image Relate to What It Shows?—The Uses of Photography among the Badagas of South India\",\"authors\":\"F. Heidemann\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08949468.2022.2017246\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"“ How does a photograph relate to what it shows? ” This is a central conundrum of photography and is debated in academic journals as well as across the coffee-table. We find the two kinds of partial answer at the end-points of a long continuum. On the one side, the first approach, it is claimed that photography is like a fingerprint or a face mask, an unbiased copy of a (visual) impression, and what we see has actually happened. Thus two aircraft flew into the Twin Towers (in 2001), the cruiser Costa Concordia was shipwrecked (in 2012), and Donald Trump met Kim Jong Un (in 2018). On the other hand, a second approach rejects this view: photographs are not documents but commentaries; they do not reflect but construct the world, because they show just one moment and from one perspective; they can be modified in the post-production, and themselves become objects of subjective reading. Each view on this particular relationship of the picture and the depicted cannot ignore the other side. first counts. paradox dialectics is that eye\",\"PeriodicalId\":44055,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Visual Anthropology\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"80 - 92\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Visual Anthropology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08949468.2022.2017246\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ANTHROPOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Visual Anthropology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08949468.2022.2017246","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

“一张照片和它所展示的东西有什么关系?”这是摄影的核心难题,无论是在学术期刊上还是在咖啡桌上,人们都在讨论这个问题。我们在长连续体的端点处找到了两种部分答案。一方面,第一种方法,它声称摄影就像指纹或面具,是(视觉)印象的无偏拷贝,我们所看到的是真实发生过的。因此,2001年有两架飞机撞进双子塔,2012年歌诗达协和号巡洋舰失事,2018年唐纳德·特朗普会见了金正恩。另一方面,第二种方法反对这种观点:照片不是文件,而是评论;它们不是反映世界,而是构建世界,因为它们只展示一个时刻,从一个角度;它们可以在后期制作中被修改,自身也成为主观阅读的对象。关于这幅画和被描绘物的特殊关系的每一种观点都不能忽视另一方面。第一次计数。悖论就是辩证法的那只眼睛
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How Does an Image Relate to What It Shows?—The Uses of Photography among the Badagas of South India
“ How does a photograph relate to what it shows? ” This is a central conundrum of photography and is debated in academic journals as well as across the coffee-table. We find the two kinds of partial answer at the end-points of a long continuum. On the one side, the first approach, it is claimed that photography is like a fingerprint or a face mask, an unbiased copy of a (visual) impression, and what we see has actually happened. Thus two aircraft flew into the Twin Towers (in 2001), the cruiser Costa Concordia was shipwrecked (in 2012), and Donald Trump met Kim Jong Un (in 2018). On the other hand, a second approach rejects this view: photographs are not documents but commentaries; they do not reflect but construct the world, because they show just one moment and from one perspective; they can be modified in the post-production, and themselves become objects of subjective reading. Each view on this particular relationship of the picture and the depicted cannot ignore the other side. first counts. paradox dialectics is that eye
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Visual Anthropology
Visual Anthropology ANTHROPOLOGY-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
50.00%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: Visual Anthropology is a scholarly journal presenting original articles, commentary, discussions, film reviews, and book reviews on anthropological and ethnographic topics. The journal focuses on the study of human behavior through visual means. Experts in the field also examine visual symbolic forms from a cultural-historical framework and provide a cross-cultural study of art and artifacts. Visual Anthropology also promotes the study, use, and production of anthropological and ethnographic films, videos, and photographs for research and teaching.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信