科学革命、工业革命、技术革命还是革命性的技术?对Marwala和Ntlatlapa的回应[J] .科学通报,2009;19(1/2)。

IF 1.5 4区 综合性期刊 Q2 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
I. Moll
{"title":"科学革命、工业革命、技术革命还是革命性的技术?对Marwala和Ntlatlapa的回应[J] .科学通报,2009;19(1/2)。","authors":"I. Moll","doi":"10.17159/sajs.2023/15767","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Critical responses by Marwala and Ntlatlapa challenged Moll’s refutation of a contemporary technological revolution as a necessary but not sufficient stratum of a Fourth Industrial Revolution (S Afr J Sci. 2023;119(1/2)). This rejoinder suggests that they work with loose criteria about what counts as a ‘revolution’, and therefore confuse the character of industrial, scientific and technological revolutions. Therefore, their defence of the existence of a new, contemporary technological revolution, and a related economic, social and geopolitical revolution, rests on shaky conceptual ground. Neither the pandemic nor an unprecedented fusion of technologies has produced a ‘Fourth Industrial Revolution’.","PeriodicalId":21928,"journal":{"name":"South African Journal of Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Scientific revolution, industrial revolution, technological revolution or revolutionary technology? A rejoinder to Marwala and Ntlatlapa (S Afr J Sci. 2023;119(1/2))\",\"authors\":\"I. Moll\",\"doi\":\"10.17159/sajs.2023/15767\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Critical responses by Marwala and Ntlatlapa challenged Moll’s refutation of a contemporary technological revolution as a necessary but not sufficient stratum of a Fourth Industrial Revolution (S Afr J Sci. 2023;119(1/2)). This rejoinder suggests that they work with loose criteria about what counts as a ‘revolution’, and therefore confuse the character of industrial, scientific and technological revolutions. Therefore, their defence of the existence of a new, contemporary technological revolution, and a related economic, social and geopolitical revolution, rests on shaky conceptual ground. Neither the pandemic nor an unprecedented fusion of technologies has produced a ‘Fourth Industrial Revolution’.\",\"PeriodicalId\":21928,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"South African Journal of Science\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"South African Journal of Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17159/sajs.2023/15767\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Journal of Science","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17159/sajs.2023/15767","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

Marwala和Ntlatlapa的批判性回应挑战了Moll的反驳,即当代技术革命是第四次工业革命的必要但不充分的阶层(S Afr J Sci. 2023;119(1/2))。这一反驳表明,他们对“革命”的定义标准很松散,因此混淆了工业革命、科学革命和技术革命的性质。因此,他们为一场新的当代技术革命以及相关的经济、社会和地缘政治革命的存在所作的辩护,是建立在不可靠的概念基础之上的。大流行和前所未有的技术融合都没有产生“第四次工业革命”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Scientific revolution, industrial revolution, technological revolution or revolutionary technology? A rejoinder to Marwala and Ntlatlapa (S Afr J Sci. 2023;119(1/2))
Critical responses by Marwala and Ntlatlapa challenged Moll’s refutation of a contemporary technological revolution as a necessary but not sufficient stratum of a Fourth Industrial Revolution (S Afr J Sci. 2023;119(1/2)). This rejoinder suggests that they work with loose criteria about what counts as a ‘revolution’, and therefore confuse the character of industrial, scientific and technological revolutions. Therefore, their defence of the existence of a new, contemporary technological revolution, and a related economic, social and geopolitical revolution, rests on shaky conceptual ground. Neither the pandemic nor an unprecedented fusion of technologies has produced a ‘Fourth Industrial Revolution’.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
South African Journal of Science
South African Journal of Science 综合性期刊-综合性期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
4.20%
发文量
131
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The South African Journal of Science is a multidisciplinary journal published bimonthly by the Academy of Science of South Africa. Our mandate is to publish original research with an interdisciplinary or regional focus, which will interest readers from more than one discipline, and to provide a forum for discussion of news and developments in research and higher education. Authors are requested to write their papers and reports in a manner and style that is intelligible to specialists and non-specialists alike. Research contributions, which are peer reviewed, are of three kinds: Review Articles, Research Articles and Research Letters.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信