跨界空间规划轴:易北河/拉贝河欧洲地区的不连续性和协调建议

IF 0.7 Q3 GEOGRAPHY
GeoScape Pub Date : 2018-12-01 DOI:10.2478/geosc-2018-0012
Sebastian Bartel, J. Albrecht, V. Hruška, K. Rybová, André Ortner
{"title":"跨界空间规划轴:易北河/拉贝河欧洲地区的不连续性和协调建议","authors":"Sebastian Bartel, J. Albrecht, V. Hruška, K. Rybová, André Ortner","doi":"10.2478/geosc-2018-0012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Spatial planning axes are an important instrument of spatial planning to help connect urban areas and ensure the accessibility of rural areas and their development. The planning of such axes can steer population and traffic flows, decisions on the locations of economic developments as well as infrastructures such as cable networks. In this paper, current spatial planning axes and their continuity are analysed regarding their suitability to promote sustainable cross-border European development. Two neighbouring regions are investigated as examples, namely the Regional Planning Authority Oberes Elbtal/Osterzgebirge (Germany, Saxony) and the Ústí nad Labem Region (Czechia). The overarching research question is how transboundary spatial planning axes can be harmonised? This can be broken down into the following three sub-questions: (1) Which differences exist between the Saxon and Czech planning systems? (2) How is the need for harmonisation assessed by planning practitioners? (3) Which transboundary recommendations can be given from a scientific perspective? To answer these research questions, expert interviews were conducted with relevant stakeholders from spatial planning authorities as well as scientific and political institutions.","PeriodicalId":42291,"journal":{"name":"GeoScape","volume":"12 1","pages":"114 - 123"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Transboundary spatial planning axes: Discontinuities and suggestions for harmonisation in the Elbe/Labe Euroregion\",\"authors\":\"Sebastian Bartel, J. Albrecht, V. Hruška, K. Rybová, André Ortner\",\"doi\":\"10.2478/geosc-2018-0012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Spatial planning axes are an important instrument of spatial planning to help connect urban areas and ensure the accessibility of rural areas and their development. The planning of such axes can steer population and traffic flows, decisions on the locations of economic developments as well as infrastructures such as cable networks. In this paper, current spatial planning axes and their continuity are analysed regarding their suitability to promote sustainable cross-border European development. Two neighbouring regions are investigated as examples, namely the Regional Planning Authority Oberes Elbtal/Osterzgebirge (Germany, Saxony) and the Ústí nad Labem Region (Czechia). The overarching research question is how transboundary spatial planning axes can be harmonised? This can be broken down into the following three sub-questions: (1) Which differences exist between the Saxon and Czech planning systems? (2) How is the need for harmonisation assessed by planning practitioners? (3) Which transboundary recommendations can be given from a scientific perspective? To answer these research questions, expert interviews were conducted with relevant stakeholders from spatial planning authorities as well as scientific and political institutions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42291,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"GeoScape\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"114 - 123\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"GeoScape\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2478/geosc-2018-0012\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOGRAPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GeoScape","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/geosc-2018-0012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

摘要空间规划轴线是空间规划的重要工具,有助于连接城市地区,确保农村地区的可达性及其发展。这些轴线的规划可以引导人口和交通流量,决定经济发展的位置以及有线网络等基础设施。本文分析了当前的空间规划轴线及其连续性,以确定其是否适合促进欧洲可持续跨境发展。以两个邻近地区为例进行了调查,即地区规划局Oberes Elbtal/Osterzgebirge(德国,萨克森州)和Ústínad Labem地区(捷克)。首要的研究问题是如何协调跨界空间规划轴线?这可以分为以下三个子问题:(1)撒克逊和捷克的规划系统之间存在哪些差异?(2) 规划从业者如何评估协调的必要性?(3) 从科学角度可以提出哪些跨界建议?为了回答这些研究问题,对空间规划当局以及科学和政治机构的相关利益攸关方进行了专家访谈。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Transboundary spatial planning axes: Discontinuities and suggestions for harmonisation in the Elbe/Labe Euroregion
Abstract Spatial planning axes are an important instrument of spatial planning to help connect urban areas and ensure the accessibility of rural areas and their development. The planning of such axes can steer population and traffic flows, decisions on the locations of economic developments as well as infrastructures such as cable networks. In this paper, current spatial planning axes and their continuity are analysed regarding their suitability to promote sustainable cross-border European development. Two neighbouring regions are investigated as examples, namely the Regional Planning Authority Oberes Elbtal/Osterzgebirge (Germany, Saxony) and the Ústí nad Labem Region (Czechia). The overarching research question is how transboundary spatial planning axes can be harmonised? This can be broken down into the following three sub-questions: (1) Which differences exist between the Saxon and Czech planning systems? (2) How is the need for harmonisation assessed by planning practitioners? (3) Which transboundary recommendations can be given from a scientific perspective? To answer these research questions, expert interviews were conducted with relevant stakeholders from spatial planning authorities as well as scientific and political institutions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
GeoScape
GeoScape GEOGRAPHY-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
7
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信