CMC环境下性别对外语学习者话语功能的影响

Q1 Arts and Humanities

International Journal of Arabic-English Studies Pub Date : 2023-06-20 DOI:10.33806/ijaes.v23i2.460

Mohammad Bani Younes, Alaa' M. Smadi, A. AbuSeileek, Ghaleb Rabab’ah

{"title":"CMC环境下性别对外语学习者话语功能的影响","authors":"Mohammad Bani Younes, Alaa' M. Smadi, A. AbuSeileek, Ghaleb Rabab’ah","doi":"10.33806/ijaes.v23i2.460","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study investigates the role of gender on EFL Learners’ output of discourse functions obtained from computer-mediated communications (CMC) via Skype. The study seeks to answer the question: Are there any statistically significant differences among the total means of discourse functions generated by gender groups (same-gender (male-male (MM), and female-female (FF)) and mixed-gender (female-male (FM), and male-female (MF)))? Sixty-four undergraduates (32 females and 32 males) participated in the study. They were assigned into two gender main groups: same-gender (MM: 16 males who chatted in pair groups with each other; FF: 16 females who chatted in pairs with each other) and mixed-gender groups (32 participants (16 females chatting with 16 males in pairs, MF (males’ output) and FM (females’ output)). Participants were asked to chat in pairs for an hour. Results revealed that FF group produced significantly more discourse functions than all the other gender groups, by having the highest total mean.","PeriodicalId":37677,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Arabic-English Studies","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Influence of Gender on EFL learners’ Discourse Functions in a CMC Environment\",\"authors\":\"Mohammad Bani Younes, Alaa' M. Smadi, A. AbuSeileek, Ghaleb Rabab’ah\",\"doi\":\"10.33806/ijaes.v23i2.460\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study investigates the role of gender on EFL Learners’ output of discourse functions obtained from computer-mediated communications (CMC) via Skype. The study seeks to answer the question: Are there any statistically significant differences among the total means of discourse functions generated by gender groups (same-gender (male-male (MM), and female-female (FF)) and mixed-gender (female-male (FM), and male-female (MF)))? Sixty-four undergraduates (32 females and 32 males) participated in the study. They were assigned into two gender main groups: same-gender (MM: 16 males who chatted in pair groups with each other; FF: 16 females who chatted in pairs with each other) and mixed-gender groups (32 participants (16 females chatting with 16 males in pairs, MF (males’ output) and FM (females’ output)). Participants were asked to chat in pairs for an hour. Results revealed that FF group produced significantly more discourse functions than all the other gender groups, by having the highest total mean.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37677,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Arabic-English Studies\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Arabic-English Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33806/ijaes.v23i2.460\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Arabic-English Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33806/ijaes.v23i2.460","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究调查了性别对英语学习者通过Skype进行计算机中介交流（CMC）获得的话语功能输出的影响。该研究试图回答这样一个问题：性别群体（同性别（男-男（MM）和女-女（FF））和混合性别（女-男（FM）和男-女（MF））产生的话语功能的总手段之间是否存在统计学上的显著差异？64名本科生（32名女性和32名男性）参与了这项研究。他们被分为两个性别主要组：同一性别组（MM：16名男性，成对聊天；FF：16名女性，成对聊天）和混合性别组（32名参与者（16名女性与16名男性成对聊天，MF（男性输出）和FM（女性输出））。参与者被要求两人一组聊一个小时。结果显示，FF组产生的话语功能显著多于所有其他性别组，具有最高的总均值。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

The Influence of Gender on EFL learners’ Discourse Functions in a CMC Environment

This study investigates the role of gender on EFL Learners’ output of discourse functions obtained from computer-mediated communications (CMC) via Skype. The study seeks to answer the question: Are there any statistically significant differences among the total means of discourse functions generated by gender groups (same-gender (male-male (MM), and female-female (FF)) and mixed-gender (female-male (FM), and male-female (MF)))? Sixty-four undergraduates (32 females and 32 males) participated in the study. They were assigned into two gender main groups: same-gender (MM: 16 males who chatted in pair groups with each other; FF: 16 females who chatted in pairs with each other) and mixed-gender groups (32 participants (16 females chatting with 16 males in pairs, MF (males’ output) and FM (females’ output)). Participants were asked to chat in pairs for an hour. Results revealed that FF group produced significantly more discourse functions than all the other gender groups, by having the highest total mean.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

International Journal of Arabic-English Studies Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory

CiteScore

1.10

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The aim of this international refereed journal is to promote original research into cross-language and cross-cultural studies in general, and Arabic-English contrastive and comparative studies in particular. Within this framework, the journal welcomes contributions to such areas of interest as comparative literature, contrastive textology, contrastive linguistics, lexicology, stylistics, and translation studies. The journal is also interested in theoretical and practical research on both English and Arabic as well as in foreign language education in the Arab world. Reviews of important, up-to- date, relevant publications in English and Arabic are also welcome. In addition to articles and book reviews, IJAES has room for notes, discussion and relevant academic presentations and reports. These may consist of comments, statements on current issues, short reports on ongoing research, or short replies to other articles. The International Journal of Arabic-English Studies (IJAES) is the forum of debate and research for the Association of Professors of English and Translation at Arab Universities (APETAU). However, contributions from scholars involved in language, literature and translation across language communities are invited.