欧盟市场公民范式:接受还是放弃?

IF 2.2 1区 社会学 Q1 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
Cristina Juverdeanu
{"title":"欧盟市场公民范式:接受还是放弃?","authors":"Cristina Juverdeanu","doi":"10.1080/07036337.2022.2128282","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT EU citizenship’s long-lasting dependency on worker rights has been scrutinised by the literature since the introduction of the status. Three new volumes deal with the intertwined evolution between the two in the longue durée, all by applying the stress tests of our times: Brexit and Euroscepticism. In a complementary way, both nuts and bolts and fissures of EU citizenship emerge and portray a novel citizenship that caters to the mobile, bypassing the sedentariness of national citizenship, but still lacks in the protection of the non-mobile and economically inactive. In the future, the literature could benefit from a closer connection to EU integration theories as well as from a more attentive look at how Brexit is the perfect exposer of both strengths and weaknesses of EU citizenship.","PeriodicalId":47516,"journal":{"name":"Journal of European Integration","volume":"44 1","pages":"1011 - 1017"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The EU Market Citizenship paradigm: embraced or abandoned?\",\"authors\":\"Cristina Juverdeanu\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/07036337.2022.2128282\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT EU citizenship’s long-lasting dependency on worker rights has been scrutinised by the literature since the introduction of the status. Three new volumes deal with the intertwined evolution between the two in the longue durée, all by applying the stress tests of our times: Brexit and Euroscepticism. In a complementary way, both nuts and bolts and fissures of EU citizenship emerge and portray a novel citizenship that caters to the mobile, bypassing the sedentariness of national citizenship, but still lacks in the protection of the non-mobile and economically inactive. In the future, the literature could benefit from a closer connection to EU integration theories as well as from a more attentive look at how Brexit is the perfect exposer of both strengths and weaknesses of EU citizenship.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47516,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of European Integration\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"1011 - 1017\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of European Integration\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2022.2128282\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of European Integration","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2022.2128282","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自欧盟公民身份引入以来,文献一直在仔细研究欧盟公民身份对工人权利的长期依赖。三本新书通过运用我们这个时代的压力测试:英国退欧和欧洲怀疑主义,探讨了这两者在漫长的时间里相互交织的演变。以一种互补的方式,欧盟公民身份的细节和裂缝都出现了,并描绘了一种新的公民身份,它迎合了流动性,绕过了国家公民身份的久坐不动,但仍然缺乏对非流动性和经济不活跃的保护。在未来,这些文献可以从与欧盟一体化理论的更紧密联系中受益,也可以从更仔细地看待英国脱欧如何完美地暴露了欧盟公民身份的优势和劣势中受益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The EU Market Citizenship paradigm: embraced or abandoned?
ABSTRACT EU citizenship’s long-lasting dependency on worker rights has been scrutinised by the literature since the introduction of the status. Three new volumes deal with the intertwined evolution between the two in the longue durée, all by applying the stress tests of our times: Brexit and Euroscepticism. In a complementary way, both nuts and bolts and fissures of EU citizenship emerge and portray a novel citizenship that caters to the mobile, bypassing the sedentariness of national citizenship, but still lacks in the protection of the non-mobile and economically inactive. In the future, the literature could benefit from a closer connection to EU integration theories as well as from a more attentive look at how Brexit is the perfect exposer of both strengths and weaknesses of EU citizenship.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
6.90%
发文量
52
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信