第四次工业革命时期开放创新的网络分析

IF 1.8 4区 管理学 Q3 BUSINESS
Hyungbo Shim, Yonghwan Kim, G. Minton, Dongyan Nan, Yerin Kim, Haein Lee, Seongbin Lee, J. Kim
{"title":"第四次工业革命时期开放创新的网络分析","authors":"Hyungbo Shim, Yonghwan Kim, G. Minton, Dongyan Nan, Yerin Kim, Haein Lee, Seongbin Lee, J. Kim","doi":"10.1080/19761597.2021.1905013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Open innovation (OI) is a crucial strategy regardless of sector, public or private, or academic or practical. However, the concept itself is often considered abstract and broad. Therefore, this study explored the coauthorship network and its groups to empirically observe the phenomenon of an open innovation. It also examined the semantic network of subject fields in open innovation research. We used coauthorship data to observe collaboration among authors. To examine how an open innovation is conceptualised and explained in academia, we used the abstracts of papers and the classification data of the journals where the papers were published. The results of the analysis found a mainstream group, which is a small group-to-group connection. We observed that the small groups are connected by key authors. We found that a social network of authorship and a semantic network of abstracts are both closely related. Our results provide a deeper understanding of an open innovation.","PeriodicalId":45884,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Technology Innovation","volume":"30 1","pages":"538 - 558"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/19761597.2021.1905013","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Network analysis of open innovation in the era of the Fourth Industrial Revolution\",\"authors\":\"Hyungbo Shim, Yonghwan Kim, G. Minton, Dongyan Nan, Yerin Kim, Haein Lee, Seongbin Lee, J. Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/19761597.2021.1905013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Open innovation (OI) is a crucial strategy regardless of sector, public or private, or academic or practical. However, the concept itself is often considered abstract and broad. Therefore, this study explored the coauthorship network and its groups to empirically observe the phenomenon of an open innovation. It also examined the semantic network of subject fields in open innovation research. We used coauthorship data to observe collaboration among authors. To examine how an open innovation is conceptualised and explained in academia, we used the abstracts of papers and the classification data of the journals where the papers were published. The results of the analysis found a mainstream group, which is a small group-to-group connection. We observed that the small groups are connected by key authors. We found that a social network of authorship and a semantic network of abstracts are both closely related. Our results provide a deeper understanding of an open innovation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45884,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asian Journal of Technology Innovation\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"538 - 558\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/19761597.2021.1905013\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asian Journal of Technology Innovation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/19761597.2021.1905013\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Technology Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19761597.2021.1905013","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要开放创新是一项至关重要的战略,无论是公共部门还是私营部门,无论是学术界还是实践界。然而,这个概念本身往往被认为是抽象和宽泛的。因此,本研究探索了合著者网络及其群体对开放创新现象的实证观察。它还考察了开放创新研究中主题领域的语义网络。我们使用合著者的数据来观察作者之间的合作。为了研究开放创新在学术界是如何被概念化和解释的,我们使用了论文摘要和论文发表地期刊的分类数据。分析结果发现了一个主流群体,这是一个小群体与群体之间的联系。我们观察到,这些小组由主要作者联系在一起。我们发现作者的社会网络和摘要的语义网络都是密切相关的。我们的研究结果提供了对开放创新的更深入理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Network analysis of open innovation in the era of the Fourth Industrial Revolution
ABSTRACT Open innovation (OI) is a crucial strategy regardless of sector, public or private, or academic or practical. However, the concept itself is often considered abstract and broad. Therefore, this study explored the coauthorship network and its groups to empirically observe the phenomenon of an open innovation. It also examined the semantic network of subject fields in open innovation research. We used coauthorship data to observe collaboration among authors. To examine how an open innovation is conceptualised and explained in academia, we used the abstracts of papers and the classification data of the journals where the papers were published. The results of the analysis found a mainstream group, which is a small group-to-group connection. We observed that the small groups are connected by key authors. We found that a social network of authorship and a semantic network of abstracts are both closely related. Our results provide a deeper understanding of an open innovation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
12.00%
发文量
21
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信