广泛的补贴还是有针对性的转移支付?分配公平vs宏观经济成本

IF 3.3 3区 经济学 Q1 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES
Andrew Feltenstein, B. Datta
{"title":"广泛的补贴还是有针对性的转移支付?分配公平vs宏观经济成本","authors":"Andrew Feltenstein, B. Datta","doi":"10.1080/17487870.2020.1785299","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT We study the trade-off between “broad-based energy subsidy” and “subsidy reform and targeted transfer” in the developing country context. We analyze the incidence of an electricity tariff differential subsidy program in Pakistan and find that the greater share of subsidy benefit goes to relatively non-poor households. We then conduct a computable general equilibrium exercise of electricity subsidy reform and targeted transfer, and our results indicate that redistributing savings from electricity subsidy reform improves poor households’ real income. However, this comes at the cost of short-term economic slowdown, before the economy returns to the benchmark level in the long term.","PeriodicalId":51737,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Economic Policy Reform","volume":"25 1","pages":"211 - 228"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17487870.2020.1785299","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Broad-based subsidies or targeted transfers? Distributional equity vs macroeconomic costs\",\"authors\":\"Andrew Feltenstein, B. Datta\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17487870.2020.1785299\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT We study the trade-off between “broad-based energy subsidy” and “subsidy reform and targeted transfer” in the developing country context. We analyze the incidence of an electricity tariff differential subsidy program in Pakistan and find that the greater share of subsidy benefit goes to relatively non-poor households. We then conduct a computable general equilibrium exercise of electricity subsidy reform and targeted transfer, and our results indicate that redistributing savings from electricity subsidy reform improves poor households’ real income. However, this comes at the cost of short-term economic slowdown, before the economy returns to the benchmark level in the long term.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51737,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Economic Policy Reform\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"211 - 228\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17487870.2020.1785299\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Economic Policy Reform\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17487870.2020.1785299\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Economic Policy Reform","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17487870.2020.1785299","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

本文研究了发展中国家背景下“基础广泛的能源补贴”与“补贴改革与定向转移”之间的权衡关系。我们分析了巴基斯坦电价差异补贴计划的发生率,发现补贴收益的更大份额流向了相对非贫困的家庭。然后,我们对电力补贴改革和定向转移进行了可计算的一般均衡练习,结果表明,电力补贴改革带来的储蓄再分配提高了贫困家庭的实际收入。然而,这是以短期经济放缓为代价的,而长期来看,经济还没有恢复到基准水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Broad-based subsidies or targeted transfers? Distributional equity vs macroeconomic costs
ABSTRACT We study the trade-off between “broad-based energy subsidy” and “subsidy reform and targeted transfer” in the developing country context. We analyze the incidence of an electricity tariff differential subsidy program in Pakistan and find that the greater share of subsidy benefit goes to relatively non-poor households. We then conduct a computable general equilibrium exercise of electricity subsidy reform and targeted transfer, and our results indicate that redistributing savings from electricity subsidy reform improves poor households’ real income. However, this comes at the cost of short-term economic slowdown, before the economy returns to the benchmark level in the long term.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
期刊介绍: The Journal of Economic Policy Reform focuses on the analysis of economic policy reform. The journal draws upon what lessons can be learned from the successes and failures of countries undertaking reforms and how existing theories can be developed to shed light on positive as well as normative aspects of the reform process. The Journal of Economic Policy Reform encourages work from economists and political economy analysts on policies to promote growth and reduce poverty, intellectual property rights, aid versus trade, debt and debt relief, taxation and social security systems, surveys of key reform issues, as well as on corruption, democracy, emerging markets and the role of multilateral institutions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信