多元主义还是Paralelism?葡萄牙电视台黄金时段新闻的政治评论

Q3 Social Sciences
Rita Figueiras
{"title":"多元主义还是Paralelism?葡萄牙电视台黄金时段新闻的政治评论","authors":"Rita Figueiras","doi":"10.20287/EC.N26.V1.A19","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study about political commentary in the newscasts looks at commentary as an indicator of the relationship between the media and politics in Portugal. In order to do that, the profile of commentators is analyzed in both free-to-air and cable network chan- nels, from 2000 to 2015. The quantitative and longitudinal analysis showed that television commentary slots are occupied mainly both by journalists and politicians, and that the increasing presence of  one profile did not imply the declining presence of the other throughout time. The study also showed a division of the commentary slots between the power parties and a stronger presence of commentatos coming from the right-wing parties. Results indicate that the interactional models between the media and politics theorized by the concepts of political paral- lelism and journalistic interventionism help us to argue that the media coalition around the power parties and also the autonomy of the media are both explanatory factors of how prime-time commentary has evolved throughout time. This study suggests that primetime punditry reflects and it is also a consequence of the complex relationship between media and politics in Portugal.","PeriodicalId":55854,"journal":{"name":"Estudos em Comunicacao","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pluralismo ou Paralelismo? O comentário político nos noticiários do prime-time na televisão portuguesa\",\"authors\":\"Rita Figueiras\",\"doi\":\"10.20287/EC.N26.V1.A19\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study about political commentary in the newscasts looks at commentary as an indicator of the relationship between the media and politics in Portugal. In order to do that, the profile of commentators is analyzed in both free-to-air and cable network chan- nels, from 2000 to 2015. The quantitative and longitudinal analysis showed that television commentary slots are occupied mainly both by journalists and politicians, and that the increasing presence of  one profile did not imply the declining presence of the other throughout time. The study also showed a division of the commentary slots between the power parties and a stronger presence of commentatos coming from the right-wing parties. Results indicate that the interactional models between the media and politics theorized by the concepts of political paral- lelism and journalistic interventionism help us to argue that the media coalition around the power parties and also the autonomy of the media are both explanatory factors of how prime-time commentary has evolved throughout time. This study suggests that primetime punditry reflects and it is also a consequence of the complex relationship between media and politics in Portugal.\",\"PeriodicalId\":55854,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Estudos em Comunicacao\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-05-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Estudos em Comunicacao\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20287/EC.N26.V1.A19\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Estudos em Comunicacao","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20287/EC.N26.V1.A19","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

这项关于新闻广播中的政治评论的研究将评论视为葡萄牙媒体与政治关系的一个指标。为了做到这一点,从2000年到2015年,我们分析了免费电视和有线电视网络频道的评论员情况。定量和纵向分析表明,电视评论时段主要由记者和政治家占据,而且随着时间的推移,一种形象出现的增加并不意味着另一种形象出现的减少。该研究还显示,权力政党之间的评论时段有所划分,右翼政党的评论更多。结果表明,以政治平行主义和新闻干预主义为理论基础的媒体与政治的互动模式有助于我们论证围绕权力政党的媒体联盟以及媒体的自主性都是黄金时段评论如何演变的解释因素。这项研究表明,黄金时段的权威言论反映了葡萄牙媒体与政治之间复杂的关系,也是这种关系的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pluralismo ou Paralelismo? O comentário político nos noticiários do prime-time na televisão portuguesa
This study about political commentary in the newscasts looks at commentary as an indicator of the relationship between the media and politics in Portugal. In order to do that, the profile of commentators is analyzed in both free-to-air and cable network chan- nels, from 2000 to 2015. The quantitative and longitudinal analysis showed that television commentary slots are occupied mainly both by journalists and politicians, and that the increasing presence of  one profile did not imply the declining presence of the other throughout time. The study also showed a division of the commentary slots between the power parties and a stronger presence of commentatos coming from the right-wing parties. Results indicate that the interactional models between the media and politics theorized by the concepts of political paral- lelism and journalistic interventionism help us to argue that the media coalition around the power parties and also the autonomy of the media are both explanatory factors of how prime-time commentary has evolved throughout time. This study suggests that primetime punditry reflects and it is also a consequence of the complex relationship between media and politics in Portugal.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Estudos em Comunicacao
Estudos em Comunicacao Social Sciences-Communication
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊介绍: The main guidelines of the Journal editorial policy are oriented to the concepts of "citizenship" and "participation", understood from a communicational point of view, involving processes and devices of knowledge circulation and opinion formation in the political field in general, and in specific areas of public policy such as health, education, science culture, public opinion, gender and identity. As examples of priority interests areas one finds the following: journalism and public opinion; citizen, participatory and public journalism; responsibility and accountability of institutions, governments and companies; media and public sphere; social movements in the areas of environment, science, health, ecology, culture, identity and gender; media and political parties; political representation; new forms of online participation; methods of analysis of participation; digital democracy; media, deliberation and participation; communitarian communication; communication and development; policies of recognition and comparative studies of communication in different geographical and cultural contexts, among others.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信