评估信息提供者之间RAISD和MSWO排名的收敛有效性

IF 1.1 4区心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL

Behavioral Interventions Pub Date : 2023-07-24 DOI:10.1002/bin.1964

Sara R. Jeglum, Isaac J. Melanson, Matthew J. O’Brien

{"title":"评估信息提供者之间RAISD和MSWO排名的收敛有效性","authors":"Sara R. Jeglum, Isaac J. Melanson, Matthew J. O’Brien","doi":"10.1002/bin.1964","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The Reinforcer Assessment for Individuals with Severe Disabilities (RAISD) and multiple-stimulus without replacement preference assessment (MSWO) are evidence-based tools used to determine preferences indirectly through interview and observation of choice making, respectively. Often, the RAISD is used to inform the stimulus array of the MSWO. However, reports frequently vary between informants. This can lead to discrepant identification of putative reinforcers and therefore has the potential for weaker or ineffective reinforcement-based treatments. The purpose of this study was to compare RAISD and MSWO outcomes across informants (adolescent, caregiver, and teacher) and evaluate the convergent validity between the two measures. The results indicated that across participants, RAISD and MSWO results rarely produced convergent validity. Implications for practitioners and researchers are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":47138,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral Interventions","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating convergent validity between RAISD and MSWO rankings across informants\",\"authors\":\"Sara R. Jeglum, Isaac J. Melanson, Matthew J. O’Brien\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/bin.1964\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The Reinforcer Assessment for Individuals with Severe Disabilities (RAISD) and multiple-stimulus without replacement preference assessment (MSWO) are evidence-based tools used to determine preferences indirectly through interview and observation of choice making, respectively. Often, the RAISD is used to inform the stimulus array of the MSWO. However, reports frequently vary between informants. This can lead to discrepant identification of putative reinforcers and therefore has the potential for weaker or ineffective reinforcement-based treatments. The purpose of this study was to compare RAISD and MSWO outcomes across informants (adolescent, caregiver, and teacher) and evaluate the convergent validity between the two measures. The results indicated that across participants, RAISD and MSWO results rarely produced convergent validity. Implications for practitioners and researchers are discussed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47138,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Behavioral Interventions\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Behavioral Interventions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bin.1964\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioral Interventions","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bin.1964","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

重度残疾个体强化因素评估(RAISD)和多刺激无替代偏好评估(MSWO)分别是通过访谈和观察选择来间接确定偏好的循证工具。通常，raise被用来通知MSWO的刺激阵列。然而，举报人之间的报告经常有所不同。这可能导致对假定的强化物的不同识别，因此有可能产生较弱或无效的基于强化的治疗。本研究的目的是比较举报人(青少年、照顾者和教师)的RAISD和MSWO结果，并评估两种测量方法之间的收敛效度。结果表明，在被试中，RAISD和MSWO的结果很少产生收敛效度。讨论了对从业者和研究人员的影响。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Evaluating convergent validity between RAISD and MSWO rankings across informants

The Reinforcer Assessment for Individuals with Severe Disabilities (RAISD) and multiple-stimulus without replacement preference assessment (MSWO) are evidence-based tools used to determine preferences indirectly through interview and observation of choice making, respectively. Often, the RAISD is used to inform the stimulus array of the MSWO. However, reports frequently vary between informants. This can lead to discrepant identification of putative reinforcers and therefore has the potential for weaker or ineffective reinforcement-based treatments. The purpose of this study was to compare RAISD and MSWO outcomes across informants (adolescent, caregiver, and teacher) and evaluate the convergent validity between the two measures. The results indicated that across participants, RAISD and MSWO results rarely produced convergent validity. Implications for practitioners and researchers are discussed.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Behavioral Interventions PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-

CiteScore

1.50

自引率

20.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Behavioral Interventions aims to report research and practice involving the utilization of behavioral techniques in the treatment, education, assessment and training of students, clients or patients, as well as training techniques used with staff. Behavioral Interventions publishes: (1) research articles, (2) brief reports (a short report of an innovative technique or intervention that may be less rigorous than a research report), (3) topical literature reviews and discussion articles, (4) book reviews.