英国林肯郡的社区发展与社区食品:新古典经济学的局限性

IF 1.3 Q3 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES

Community Development Pub Date : 2023-03-04 DOI:10.1080/15575330.2022.2091627

N. Curry

{"title":"英国林肯郡的社区发展与社区食品:新古典经济学的局限性","authors":"N. Curry","doi":"10.1080/15575330.2022.2091627","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Community development in the UK has moved from private philanthropy in the early 20th Century through welfarism to a ‘marketisation’ in the 21st Century with both state contracts, and market-based performance measures. But neoclassical economics, on which such marketization is based, is an inadequate measure of community development practice as it does not accommodate a range of inequalities, spatial differences, changes over time, market failures and externalities, all of which are at the core of community food projects. Whilst community food projects address market failures, they can use innovative market mechanisms to “cushion” some of these neoclassical economics failings. A number of practical examples is offered, from Lincolnshire UK, of such innovations in relation to community food production, and environmental, food waste, and food poverty externalities.","PeriodicalId":46872,"journal":{"name":"Community Development","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Community development and community food in Lincolnshire, United Kingdom: The limitations of neoclassical economics\",\"authors\":\"N. Curry\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15575330.2022.2091627\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Community development in the UK has moved from private philanthropy in the early 20th Century through welfarism to a ‘marketisation’ in the 21st Century with both state contracts, and market-based performance measures. But neoclassical economics, on which such marketization is based, is an inadequate measure of community development practice as it does not accommodate a range of inequalities, spatial differences, changes over time, market failures and externalities, all of which are at the core of community food projects. Whilst community food projects address market failures, they can use innovative market mechanisms to “cushion” some of these neoclassical economics failings. A number of practical examples is offered, from Lincolnshire UK, of such innovations in relation to community food production, and environmental, food waste, and food poverty externalities.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46872,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Community Development\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Community Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15575330.2022.2091627\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Community Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15575330.2022.2091627","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

摘要

英国的社区发展已经从20世纪早期的私人慈善通过福利主义发展到21世纪的“市场化”，包括国家合同和基于市场的绩效衡量。但是，作为这种市场化基础的新古典经济学并不能充分衡量社区发展实践，因为它没有考虑到一系列的不平等、空间差异、时间变化、市场失灵和外部性，而这些都是社区食品项目的核心。虽然社区食品项目解决的是市场失灵，但它们可以利用创新的市场机制来“缓冲”一些新古典经济学的失灵。英国林肯郡提供了一些实际的例子，说明这种创新与社区食品生产、环境、食品浪费和食品贫困外部性有关。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Community development and community food in Lincolnshire, United Kingdom: The limitations of neoclassical economics

ABSTRACT Community development in the UK has moved from private philanthropy in the early 20th Century through welfarism to a ‘marketisation’ in the 21st Century with both state contracts, and market-based performance measures. But neoclassical economics, on which such marketization is based, is an inadequate measure of community development practice as it does not accommodate a range of inequalities, spatial differences, changes over time, market failures and externalities, all of which are at the core of community food projects. Whilst community food projects address market failures, they can use innovative market mechanisms to “cushion” some of these neoclassical economics failings. A number of practical examples is offered, from Lincolnshire UK, of such innovations in relation to community food production, and environmental, food waste, and food poverty externalities.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Community Development DEVELOPMENT STUDIES-

CiteScore

2.60

自引率

30.80%

发文量

期刊介绍： Community Development is the peer-reviewed journal of the Community Development Society. Community Development is devoted to improving knowledge and practice in the field of purposive community change. The mission of the journal is to advance critical theory, research, and practice in all domains of community development, including sociocultural, political, environmental, and economic. The journal welcomes manuscripts that report research; evaluate theory, methods, and techniques; examine community problems; or critically analyze the profession itself. Articles may address current issues including the environment and sustainability; food systems; land use; poverty; race, ethnicity, and gender; participation and social justice; economic development; health; housing; and other important topics impacting the field.