为获取经济利益而实施猥亵行为的提案

Julia Kosonoga-Zygmunt
{"title":"为获取经济利益而实施猥亵行为的提案","authors":"Julia Kosonoga-Zygmunt","doi":"10.26399/iusnovum.v16.4.2022.36-j.kosonoga-zygmunt","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Summary The article presents the issue of a misdemeanour of proposing to commit an unlawful act in order to obtain a material benefit classified in Article 142 MC. In order to provide full characteristics of the discussed type of misdemeanour, a classical pattern based on the traditional division of statutory features of the type of prohibited act has been adopted. The author discusses such issues as statutory penalties for this misdemeanour and concurrence of provisions. The article also draws special attention to issues raising doctrinal controversies, including inter alia: approach to the object of protection, the interpretation of the features of “prostitution”, “material benefit” or “other behavior violating public order”. A number of specific issues were also analysed, including liability under Art. 142 MC persons providing roadside sexual services.","PeriodicalId":33501,"journal":{"name":"Ius Novum","volume":"16 1","pages":"35 - 56"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Proposal to Commit an Indecent Act in Order to Derive a Financial Benefit\",\"authors\":\"Julia Kosonoga-Zygmunt\",\"doi\":\"10.26399/iusnovum.v16.4.2022.36-j.kosonoga-zygmunt\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Summary The article presents the issue of a misdemeanour of proposing to commit an unlawful act in order to obtain a material benefit classified in Article 142 MC. In order to provide full characteristics of the discussed type of misdemeanour, a classical pattern based on the traditional division of statutory features of the type of prohibited act has been adopted. The author discusses such issues as statutory penalties for this misdemeanour and concurrence of provisions. The article also draws special attention to issues raising doctrinal controversies, including inter alia: approach to the object of protection, the interpretation of the features of “prostitution”, “material benefit” or “other behavior violating public order”. A number of specific issues were also analysed, including liability under Art. 142 MC persons providing roadside sexual services.\",\"PeriodicalId\":33501,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ius Novum\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"35 - 56\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ius Novum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26399/iusnovum.v16.4.2022.36-j.kosonoga-zygmunt\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ius Novum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26399/iusnovum.v16.4.2022.36-j.kosonoga-zygmunt","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要本文提出了《刑法》第142条规定的为获取物质利益而拟实施非法行为的轻罪问题。为了充分体现所讨论的轻罪类型的特征,本文采用了基于传统的禁止行为类型法定特征划分的经典模式。笔者对该轻罪的法定处罚及条款的合用等问题进行了探讨。该条还特别提请注意引起理论争议的问题,除其他外,包括对保护对象的方法、对“卖淫”、“物质利益”或“其他违反公共秩序的行为”特征的解释。报告亦分析了若干具体问题,包括根据第142条提供路边性服务的管委会人士的法律责任。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Proposal to Commit an Indecent Act in Order to Derive a Financial Benefit
Summary The article presents the issue of a misdemeanour of proposing to commit an unlawful act in order to obtain a material benefit classified in Article 142 MC. In order to provide full characteristics of the discussed type of misdemeanour, a classical pattern based on the traditional division of statutory features of the type of prohibited act has been adopted. The author discusses such issues as statutory penalties for this misdemeanour and concurrence of provisions. The article also draws special attention to issues raising doctrinal controversies, including inter alia: approach to the object of protection, the interpretation of the features of “prostitution”, “material benefit” or “other behavior violating public order”. A number of specific issues were also analysed, including liability under Art. 142 MC persons providing roadside sexual services.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信