Hamidreza Zanguie, M. Yousefi, Saeed Ilbiegi, A. F. Pezeshk
{"title":"评估后凸和Lordosis手术的非侵入性方法的有效性和可靠性:文献综述","authors":"Hamidreza Zanguie, M. Yousefi, Saeed Ilbiegi, A. F. Pezeshk","doi":"10.18502/jmr.v17i3.13065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: A few instruments are accessible for clinical estimation of the thoracic and lumbar curvatures. This methodical survey aims to identify the validity and reliability of non- invasive thoracic kyphosis and lumbar lordosis measurements. \nMaterials and Methods: This research is a literature review. The process was performed on articles in credible databases, such as Medline, Embase, AMED, CINAHL, PubMed, and Biomedical Reference Collection, Expanded, Sport Discus, Science Direct, Web of Science, searching for the terms thoracic kyphosis, lordosis, spinal curvature, lordosis and reliability, lordosis and validity, kyphosis and reliability, kyphosis and validity, test, measure, flexi curve, radiograph, spinal mouse, inclinometer, kyphometer, image processing, Cobb, during 1960 to 2020. \nResults: The result of the systematic search revealed that ten methods among all related papers have inclusion criteria, 3D ultrasound, Arco meter, DE Brunner’s kyphometer, digital inclinometer, electro goniometer, goniometer, flexi curve angle, image processing, pantograph, and spinal mouse. \nConclusion: The validity and reliability of non-invasive methods for estimating kyphosis and lordosis curvatures were indicated in 26 papers. Based on the current little evidence, non- invasive procedures have high to very high reliability and moderate to high validity.","PeriodicalId":34281,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Modern Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validity and Reliability of Non-invasive Methods for Evaluating Kyphosis and Lordosis Curvatures: A Literature Review\",\"authors\":\"Hamidreza Zanguie, M. Yousefi, Saeed Ilbiegi, A. F. Pezeshk\",\"doi\":\"10.18502/jmr.v17i3.13065\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: A few instruments are accessible for clinical estimation of the thoracic and lumbar curvatures. This methodical survey aims to identify the validity and reliability of non- invasive thoracic kyphosis and lumbar lordosis measurements. \\nMaterials and Methods: This research is a literature review. The process was performed on articles in credible databases, such as Medline, Embase, AMED, CINAHL, PubMed, and Biomedical Reference Collection, Expanded, Sport Discus, Science Direct, Web of Science, searching for the terms thoracic kyphosis, lordosis, spinal curvature, lordosis and reliability, lordosis and validity, kyphosis and reliability, kyphosis and validity, test, measure, flexi curve, radiograph, spinal mouse, inclinometer, kyphometer, image processing, Cobb, during 1960 to 2020. \\nResults: The result of the systematic search revealed that ten methods among all related papers have inclusion criteria, 3D ultrasound, Arco meter, DE Brunner’s kyphometer, digital inclinometer, electro goniometer, goniometer, flexi curve angle, image processing, pantograph, and spinal mouse. \\nConclusion: The validity and reliability of non-invasive methods for estimating kyphosis and lordosis curvatures were indicated in 26 papers. Based on the current little evidence, non- invasive procedures have high to very high reliability and moderate to high validity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34281,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Modern Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Modern Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18502/jmr.v17i3.13065\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Modern Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/jmr.v17i3.13065","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
简介:一些仪器可用于胸腰椎曲率的临床评估。这项系统的调查旨在确定非侵入性胸部后凸和腰椎前凸测量的有效性和可靠性。材料与方法:本研究为文献综述。该过程是在可信数据库中的文章上进行的,如Medline、Embase、AMED、CINAHL、PubMed和Biomedical Reference Collection、Expanded、Sport Discus、Science Direct、Web of Science,搜索术语胸椎后凸、前凸、脊柱弯曲、前凸和可靠性、前凸与有效性、后凸与可靠性、后凸和有效性、测试、测量、弹性曲线,1960年至2020年期间的射线照片、脊髓鼠、倾斜仪、后凸仪、图像处理、Cobb。结果:系统检索结果显示,在所有相关论文中,有10种方法具有入选标准,即3D超声、Arco测量仪、DE Brunner后凸仪、数字倾斜仪、电角度计、角度计、弯曲曲线角、图像处理、缩放仪和脊髓鼠。结论:26篇论文表明了非侵入性方法估计脊柱后凸和前凸曲率的有效性和可靠性。基于目前很少的证据,非侵入性手术具有高到极高的可靠性和中到高的有效性。
Validity and Reliability of Non-invasive Methods for Evaluating Kyphosis and Lordosis Curvatures: A Literature Review
Introduction: A few instruments are accessible for clinical estimation of the thoracic and lumbar curvatures. This methodical survey aims to identify the validity and reliability of non- invasive thoracic kyphosis and lumbar lordosis measurements.
Materials and Methods: This research is a literature review. The process was performed on articles in credible databases, such as Medline, Embase, AMED, CINAHL, PubMed, and Biomedical Reference Collection, Expanded, Sport Discus, Science Direct, Web of Science, searching for the terms thoracic kyphosis, lordosis, spinal curvature, lordosis and reliability, lordosis and validity, kyphosis and reliability, kyphosis and validity, test, measure, flexi curve, radiograph, spinal mouse, inclinometer, kyphometer, image processing, Cobb, during 1960 to 2020.
Results: The result of the systematic search revealed that ten methods among all related papers have inclusion criteria, 3D ultrasound, Arco meter, DE Brunner’s kyphometer, digital inclinometer, electro goniometer, goniometer, flexi curve angle, image processing, pantograph, and spinal mouse.
Conclusion: The validity and reliability of non-invasive methods for estimating kyphosis and lordosis curvatures were indicated in 26 papers. Based on the current little evidence, non- invasive procedures have high to very high reliability and moderate to high validity.