重新审视评价理论树

IF 0.1 Q4 ECONOMICS
Chris Christie, Marvin C. Alkin
{"title":"重新审视评价理论树","authors":"Chris Christie, Marvin C. Alkin","doi":"10.29192/claeh.39.9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"When examining various evaluation prescriptive theories comparatively, we find it helpful to have a framework showing how they are related that highlights features that distinguish theoretical perspectives, thus a «theory» about theories. The evaluation theory tree that we presented in Alkin’s recent book, Evaluation Roots [Eisner, E. (2004). The roots of connoisseurship and criticism: A personal journey. In M. Alkin (Ed.), Evaluation roots: Tracing theorists’ views and influences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; Guba, E., & Lincoln, Y., (2004). The roots of fourth gen-eration evaluation: Theoretical and methodological origins. In M. Alkin (Ed.), Evaluation roots: Tracing theorists’ views and influences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; Stake, R. (2004). Stake and responsive evaluation. In M. Alkin (Ed.), Evaluation roots: Tracing theorists’ views and influences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; Wholey, J. S. (2004). Using evaluation to improve performance and support policy decision making. In M. Alkin (Ed.), Evaluation roots: Tracing theorists’ views and influences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage], is such a framework. Just as theorists modify their views over time, in this paper we suggest mod-ifications to the theory tree presented in the Roots book, including a repositioning of a few theorists, the addition of theorists, and a reconceptualization of the valuing branch.","PeriodicalId":40608,"journal":{"name":"Cuadernos del CLAEH-Centro Latinoamericano de Economia Humana","volume":"39 1","pages":"135-147"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reexaminando el árbol de la teoría de la evaluación\",\"authors\":\"Chris Christie, Marvin C. Alkin\",\"doi\":\"10.29192/claeh.39.9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"When examining various evaluation prescriptive theories comparatively, we find it helpful to have a framework showing how they are related that highlights features that distinguish theoretical perspectives, thus a «theory» about theories. The evaluation theory tree that we presented in Alkin’s recent book, Evaluation Roots [Eisner, E. (2004). The roots of connoisseurship and criticism: A personal journey. In M. Alkin (Ed.), Evaluation roots: Tracing theorists’ views and influences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; Guba, E., & Lincoln, Y., (2004). The roots of fourth gen-eration evaluation: Theoretical and methodological origins. In M. Alkin (Ed.), Evaluation roots: Tracing theorists’ views and influences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; Stake, R. (2004). Stake and responsive evaluation. In M. Alkin (Ed.), Evaluation roots: Tracing theorists’ views and influences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; Wholey, J. S. (2004). Using evaluation to improve performance and support policy decision making. In M. Alkin (Ed.), Evaluation roots: Tracing theorists’ views and influences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage], is such a framework. Just as theorists modify their views over time, in this paper we suggest mod-ifications to the theory tree presented in the Roots book, including a repositioning of a few theorists, the addition of theorists, and a reconceptualization of the valuing branch.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40608,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cuadernos del CLAEH-Centro Latinoamericano de Economia Humana\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"135-147\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cuadernos del CLAEH-Centro Latinoamericano de Economia Humana\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29192/claeh.39.9\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cuadernos del CLAEH-Centro Latinoamericano de Economia Humana","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29192/claeh.39.9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在比较研究各种评价规范理论时,我们发现有一个框架显示它们是如何相关的,突出区分理论观点的特征,从而是关于理论的“理论”是有帮助的。我们在Alkin的新书《评价根》(evaluation Roots)中提出的评价理论树[Eisner, E.(2004)]。鉴赏和批评的根源:个人旅程。在M. Alkin(编),评价根源:追踪理论家的观点和影响。加利福尼亚州千橡市:Sage;Guba, E., & Lincoln, Y.,(2004)。第四代评价的根源:理论和方法的起源。在M. Alkin(编),评价根源:追踪理论家的观点和影响。加利福尼亚州千橡市:Sage;斯特克,R.(2004)。利害关系和响应性评价。在M. Alkin(编),评价根源:追踪理论家的观点和影响。加利福尼亚州千橡市:Sage;Wholey, J. S.(2004)。使用评估来提高绩效和支持政策决策。在M. Alkin(编),评价根源:追踪理论家的观点和影响。千橡市(Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage)就是这样一个框架。正如理论家随着时间的推移会修改他们的观点一样,在本文中,我们建议对《根》一书中提出的理论树进行修改,包括重新定位一些理论家,增加理论家,以及重新概念化价值分支。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reexaminando el árbol de la teoría de la evaluación
When examining various evaluation prescriptive theories comparatively, we find it helpful to have a framework showing how they are related that highlights features that distinguish theoretical perspectives, thus a «theory» about theories. The evaluation theory tree that we presented in Alkin’s recent book, Evaluation Roots [Eisner, E. (2004). The roots of connoisseurship and criticism: A personal journey. In M. Alkin (Ed.), Evaluation roots: Tracing theorists’ views and influences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; Guba, E., & Lincoln, Y., (2004). The roots of fourth gen-eration evaluation: Theoretical and methodological origins. In M. Alkin (Ed.), Evaluation roots: Tracing theorists’ views and influences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; Stake, R. (2004). Stake and responsive evaluation. In M. Alkin (Ed.), Evaluation roots: Tracing theorists’ views and influences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; Wholey, J. S. (2004). Using evaluation to improve performance and support policy decision making. In M. Alkin (Ed.), Evaluation roots: Tracing theorists’ views and influences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage], is such a framework. Just as theorists modify their views over time, in this paper we suggest mod-ifications to the theory tree presented in the Roots book, including a repositioning of a few theorists, the addition of theorists, and a reconceptualization of the valuing branch.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信