绩效评估中的问责制:评价者问责制量表的开发与验证

IF 2.9 4区心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED

Human Performance Pub Date : 2022-01-10 DOI:10.1080/08959285.2021.2023876

Andrew P. Tenbrink, Andrew B. Speer

{"title":"绩效评估中的问责制:评价者问责制量表的开发与验证","authors":"Andrew P. Tenbrink, Andrew B. Speer","doi":"10.1080/08959285.2021.2023876","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The purpose of the current study was to create and validate a new measure of rater accountability (RA) for use in performance appraisal (PA) contexts. Previous research has identified the accountability audience as an important moderator of the effects of RA that existing measures do not consider. This new measure of RA, the Rater Accountability Scale (RAS), was developed to capture accountability pressures from different audiences. Across two studies that sampled current managers, the RAS scores achieved adequate fit and acceptable reliability. Initial construct-related validity evidence was collected by exploring relationships with convergent measures, rater characteristics, and appraisal outcomes. Overall, these findings provide support for the use of the RAS in research and applied settings while also helping to build the nomological network of RA.","PeriodicalId":47825,"journal":{"name":"Human Performance","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Accountability during Performance Appraisals: The Development and Validation of the Rater Accountability Scale\",\"authors\":\"Andrew P. Tenbrink, Andrew B. Speer\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08959285.2021.2023876\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT The purpose of the current study was to create and validate a new measure of rater accountability (RA) for use in performance appraisal (PA) contexts. Previous research has identified the accountability audience as an important moderator of the effects of RA that existing measures do not consider. This new measure of RA, the Rater Accountability Scale (RAS), was developed to capture accountability pressures from different audiences. Across two studies that sampled current managers, the RAS scores achieved adequate fit and acceptable reliability. Initial construct-related validity evidence was collected by exploring relationships with convergent measures, rater characteristics, and appraisal outcomes. Overall, these findings provide support for the use of the RAS in research and applied settings while also helping to build the nomological network of RA.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47825,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Human Performance\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Human Performance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08959285.2021.2023876\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Performance","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08959285.2021.2023876","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

摘要

摘要本研究的目的是创建和验证一种新的评分者问责制（RA）衡量标准，用于绩效评估（PA）环境。先前的研究已经确定，问责受众是RA影响的重要调节者，而现有措施没有考虑到这一点。这项新的RA衡量标准，即评分者责任量表（RAS），旨在捕捉来自不同受众的责任压力。在对现任经理进行抽样的两项研究中，RAS评分达到了足够的拟合度和可接受的可靠性。通过探索与收敛测量、评分者特征和评估结果的关系，收集了与结构相关的初始有效性证据。总的来说，这些发现为RAS在研究和应用环境中的使用提供了支持，同时也有助于建立RA的法理网络。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Accountability during Performance Appraisals: The Development and Validation of the Rater Accountability Scale

ABSTRACT The purpose of the current study was to create and validate a new measure of rater accountability (RA) for use in performance appraisal (PA) contexts. Previous research has identified the accountability audience as an important moderator of the effects of RA that existing measures do not consider. This new measure of RA, the Rater Accountability Scale (RAS), was developed to capture accountability pressures from different audiences. Across two studies that sampled current managers, the RAS scores achieved adequate fit and acceptable reliability. Initial construct-related validity evidence was collected by exploring relationships with convergent measures, rater characteristics, and appraisal outcomes. Overall, these findings provide support for the use of the RAS in research and applied settings while also helping to build the nomological network of RA.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Human Performance PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED-

CiteScore

4.30

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Human Performance publishes research investigating the nature and role of performance in the workplace and in organizational settings and offers a rich variety of information going beyond the study of traditional job behavior. Dedicated to presenting original research, theory, and measurement methods, the journal investigates individual, team, and firm level performance factors that influence work and organizational effectiveness. Human Performance is a respected forum for behavioral scientists interested in variables that motivate and promote high-level human performance, particularly in organizational and occupational settings. The journal seeks to identify and stimulate relevant research, communication, and theory concerning human capabilities and effectiveness. It serves as a valuable intellectual link between such disciplines as industrial-organizational psychology, individual differences, work physiology, organizational behavior, human resource management, and human factors.