作品、照片和政治工作:对其社会生产的人类学贡献

IF 0.3 Q3 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
Julieta Gaztañaga
{"title":"作品、照片和政治工作:对其社会生产的人类学贡献","authors":"Julieta Gaztañaga","doi":"10.17141/ICONOS.60.2018.2763","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article contributes to the literature on political practice through an anthropological analysis of public infrastructure projects in contemporary Argentina. We differentiate two socially significant perspectives for the actors involved: as political activists and the managers of public infrastructure projects. Reviewing both of these perspectives allows us to approach political work in relation to the social production of politics, and with that, break with the lens of hermeneutic cynicism through which public infrastructure projects are often viewed. The research on which this article draws is based on various ethnographic studies conducted between 1999 and 2014. Through the analysis presented in this article these studies are revisited in light of new research questions and focuses on the everyday practices of politics.","PeriodicalId":43508,"journal":{"name":"Iconos","volume":"1 1","pages":"81-99"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Obras, fotos y trabajo político: aportes antropológicos sobre su producción social\",\"authors\":\"Julieta Gaztañaga\",\"doi\":\"10.17141/ICONOS.60.2018.2763\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article contributes to the literature on political practice through an anthropological analysis of public infrastructure projects in contemporary Argentina. We differentiate two socially significant perspectives for the actors involved: as political activists and the managers of public infrastructure projects. Reviewing both of these perspectives allows us to approach political work in relation to the social production of politics, and with that, break with the lens of hermeneutic cynicism through which public infrastructure projects are often viewed. The research on which this article draws is based on various ethnographic studies conducted between 1999 and 2014. Through the analysis presented in this article these studies are revisited in light of new research questions and focuses on the everyday practices of politics.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43508,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Iconos\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"81-99\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-01-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Iconos\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17141/ICONOS.60.2018.2763\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iconos","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17141/ICONOS.60.2018.2763","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文通过对当代阿根廷公共基础设施项目的人类学分析,为政治实践文献做出贡献。我们区分了参与者的两个具有社会意义的视角:作为政治活动家和公共基础设施项目的管理者。回顾这两个视角可以让我们将政治工作与政治的社会生产联系起来,并以此打破人们经常看待公共基础设施项目的解释学犬儒主义的视角。本文的研究基于1999年至2014年间进行的各种人种学研究。通过本文中的分析,这些研究将根据新的研究问题重新审视,并侧重于日常政治实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Obras, fotos y trabajo político: aportes antropológicos sobre su producción social
This article contributes to the literature on political practice through an anthropological analysis of public infrastructure projects in contemporary Argentina. We differentiate two socially significant perspectives for the actors involved: as political activists and the managers of public infrastructure projects. Reviewing both of these perspectives allows us to approach political work in relation to the social production of politics, and with that, break with the lens of hermeneutic cynicism through which public infrastructure projects are often viewed. The research on which this article draws is based on various ethnographic studies conducted between 1999 and 2014. Through the analysis presented in this article these studies are revisited in light of new research questions and focuses on the everyday practices of politics.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Iconos
Iconos SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
审稿时长
28 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信