开放政府数据(OGD):挑战“指定社区”的概念

IF 0.8 Q3 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
Nathan Moles
{"title":"开放政府数据(OGD):挑战“指定社区”的概念","authors":"Nathan Moles","doi":"10.1108/rmj-10-2019-0065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis paper aims to explore the curation of government-produced datasets for release as open government data (OGD) from the perspective of the digital curation and preservation concept of a “Designated Community”. Specifically, it explores how digital curation functions when there is no clear Designated Community to which curation services can be targeted.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe research was conducted through a case study of the City of Toronto’s efforts to revitalize their OGD program. Data was collected using three methods: semi-structured interviews, non-participative observation and document analysis.\n\n\nFindings\nThe curators of OGD responded to the absence of a Designated Community through two complementary methods. The first was to draw from the discourse that defines the OGD domain. The second was to take a participatory approach that incorporated members of the community surrounding OGD and various other stakeholders into the process of developing a plan for the revitalization of the program.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThis study opens new directions for investigating the application of the Designated Community concept and its role in digital curation and preservation.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThe approach used by OGD curators in this case has the potential to be used in other curation situations where there is no clearly defined user group.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe findings presented in this paper contribute empirical insights to on-going discussions on the concept of a Designated Community in digital curation and preservation.\n","PeriodicalId":20923,"journal":{"name":"Records Management Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Open government data (OGD): challenging the concept of a “Designated Community”\",\"authors\":\"Nathan Moles\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/rmj-10-2019-0065\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nThis paper aims to explore the curation of government-produced datasets for release as open government data (OGD) from the perspective of the digital curation and preservation concept of a “Designated Community”. Specifically, it explores how digital curation functions when there is no clear Designated Community to which curation services can be targeted.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nThe research was conducted through a case study of the City of Toronto’s efforts to revitalize their OGD program. Data was collected using three methods: semi-structured interviews, non-participative observation and document analysis.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nThe curators of OGD responded to the absence of a Designated Community through two complementary methods. The first was to draw from the discourse that defines the OGD domain. The second was to take a participatory approach that incorporated members of the community surrounding OGD and various other stakeholders into the process of developing a plan for the revitalization of the program.\\n\\n\\nResearch limitations/implications\\nThis study opens new directions for investigating the application of the Designated Community concept and its role in digital curation and preservation.\\n\\n\\nPractical implications\\nThe approach used by OGD curators in this case has the potential to be used in other curation situations where there is no clearly defined user group.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nThe findings presented in this paper contribute empirical insights to on-going discussions on the concept of a Designated Community in digital curation and preservation.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":20923,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Records Management Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Records Management Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/rmj-10-2019-0065\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Records Management Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/rmj-10-2019-0065","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

目的本文旨在从“指定社区”的数字策展和保存概念的角度,探索政府制作的数据集作为开放政府数据(OGD)发布的策展。具体而言,它探讨了当没有明确的指定社区可以作为策展服务的目标时,数字策展是如何运作的。设计/方法/方法本研究通过多伦多市振兴其OGD计划的案例研究进行。数据收集采用三种方法:半结构化访谈、非参与性观察和文献分析。发现OGD的策展人通过两种互补的方法来应对指定社区的缺失。第一个是从定义OGD领域的话语中汲取经验。第二是采取参与式方法,将OGD周围的社区成员和各种其他利益相关者纳入制定振兴该计划的过程中。研究局限性/含义本研究为研究指定社区概念的应用及其在数字策展和保护中的作用开辟了新的方向。实际含义OGD策展人在这种情况下使用的方法有可能用于其他没有明确定义用户群体的策展情况。原创性/价值本文中的研究结果为正在进行的关于数字策展和保护中指定社区概念的讨论提供了经验见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Open government data (OGD): challenging the concept of a “Designated Community”
Purpose This paper aims to explore the curation of government-produced datasets for release as open government data (OGD) from the perspective of the digital curation and preservation concept of a “Designated Community”. Specifically, it explores how digital curation functions when there is no clear Designated Community to which curation services can be targeted. Design/methodology/approach The research was conducted through a case study of the City of Toronto’s efforts to revitalize their OGD program. Data was collected using three methods: semi-structured interviews, non-participative observation and document analysis. Findings The curators of OGD responded to the absence of a Designated Community through two complementary methods. The first was to draw from the discourse that defines the OGD domain. The second was to take a participatory approach that incorporated members of the community surrounding OGD and various other stakeholders into the process of developing a plan for the revitalization of the program. Research limitations/implications This study opens new directions for investigating the application of the Designated Community concept and its role in digital curation and preservation. Practical implications The approach used by OGD curators in this case has the potential to be used in other curation situations where there is no clearly defined user group. Originality/value The findings presented in this paper contribute empirical insights to on-going discussions on the concept of a Designated Community in digital curation and preservation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Records Management Journal
Records Management Journal INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
7.10%
发文量
11
期刊介绍: ■Electronic records management ■Effect of government policies on record management ■Strategic developments in both the public and private sectors ■Systems design and implementation ■Models for records management ■Best practice, standards and guidelines ■Risk management and business continuity ■Performance measurement ■Continuing professional development ■Consortia and co-operation ■Marketing ■Preservation ■Legal and ethical issues
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信