2019冠状病毒病与算法医学伦理:基督教视角

IF 0.1 0 RELIGION
B. H. Childs
{"title":"2019冠状病毒病与算法医学伦理:基督教视角","authors":"B. H. Childs","doi":"10.1177/00346373221133008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Triage plans which were largely developed in the face of the growing and lethal pandemic betrayed an underlying anthropology which unintentionally neglected to allow for the assignment of potentially limited interventions to underserved and less socially advantaged persons. This neglect is abetted by the structure of US medical delivery that treats medical care as a commercial commodity with an emphasis on high tech rescue medicine as opposed to preventive public health medicine. A Christian anthropology modeled by Karl Barth’s notion of analogia relationis would correct this neglect of the underserved and needy.","PeriodicalId":21049,"journal":{"name":"Review & Expositor","volume":"119 1","pages":"33 - 40"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"COVID-19 and algorithmic medical ethics: A Christian perspective\",\"authors\":\"B. H. Childs\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00346373221133008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Triage plans which were largely developed in the face of the growing and lethal pandemic betrayed an underlying anthropology which unintentionally neglected to allow for the assignment of potentially limited interventions to underserved and less socially advantaged persons. This neglect is abetted by the structure of US medical delivery that treats medical care as a commercial commodity with an emphasis on high tech rescue medicine as opposed to preventive public health medicine. A Christian anthropology modeled by Karl Barth’s notion of analogia relationis would correct this neglect of the underserved and needy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":21049,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Review & Expositor\",\"volume\":\"119 1\",\"pages\":\"33 - 40\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Review & Expositor\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00346373221133008\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review & Expositor","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00346373221133008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在面对日益严重和致命的流行病时制定的分类计划暴露了一种潜在的人类学,这种人类学无意中忽视了将潜在的有限干预措施分配给服务不足和社会地位较低的人。美国医疗服务的结构助长了这种忽视,将医疗保健视为商业商品,强调高科技救援医学,而不是预防性公共卫生医学。以卡尔·巴特的类比关系概念为模型的基督教人类学将纠正这种对服务不足和贫困者的忽视。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
COVID-19 and algorithmic medical ethics: A Christian perspective
Triage plans which were largely developed in the face of the growing and lethal pandemic betrayed an underlying anthropology which unintentionally neglected to allow for the assignment of potentially limited interventions to underserved and less socially advantaged persons. This neglect is abetted by the structure of US medical delivery that treats medical care as a commercial commodity with an emphasis on high tech rescue medicine as opposed to preventive public health medicine. A Christian anthropology modeled by Karl Barth’s notion of analogia relationis would correct this neglect of the underserved and needy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Review & Expositor
Review & Expositor RELIGION-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信